Pilot study: radiomic analysis for predicting treatment response to whole-brain radiotherapy combined temozolomide in lung cancer brain metastases

被引:0
作者
Sun, Yichu [1 ]
Liang, Fei [1 ]
Yang, Jing [2 ]
Liu, Yong [2 ]
Shen, Ziqiang [1 ]
Zhou, Chong [3 ]
Xia, Youyou [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Peoples Hosp Lianyungang 1, Lianyungang Clin Coll, Dept Radiat Oncol, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Xuzhou Med Univ, Lianyungang Hosp, Peoples Hosp Lianyungang 1, Dept Radiat Oncol, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Xuzhou Cent Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2024年 / 14卷
关键词
brain metastases; whole-brain radiation therapy; temozolomide; radiomics; nomogram;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2024.1395313
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective The objective of this study is to assess the viability of utilizing radiomics for predicting the treatment response of lung cancer brain metastases (LCBM) to whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) combined with temozolomide (TMZ).Methods Fifty-three patients diagnosed with LCBM and undergoing WBRT combined with TMZ were enrolled. Patients were divided into responsive and non-responsive groups based on the RANO-BM criteria. Radiomic features were extracted from contrast-enhanced the whole brain tissue CT images. Feature selection was performed using t-tests, Pearson correlation coefficients, and Least Absolute Shrinkage And Selection (LASSO) regression. Logistic regression was employed to construct the radiomics model, which was then integrated with clinical data to develop the nomogram model. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and clinical utility was assessed using decision curve analysis (DCA).Results A total of 1834 radiomic features were extracted from each patient's images, and 3 features with predictive value were selected. Both the radiomics and nomogram models exhibited satisfactory predictive performance and clinical utility, with the nomogram model demonstrating superior predictive value. The ROC analysis revealed that the AUC of the radiomics model in the training and testing sets were 0.776 and 0.767, respectively, while the AUC of the nomogram model were 0.799 and 0.833, respectively. DCA curves demonstrated that both models provided benefits to patients across various thresholds.Conclusion Radiomic-defined image biomarkers can effectively predict the treatment response of WBRT combined with TMZ in patients with LCBM, offering potential to optimize treatment decisions for this condition.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Does overall treatment time impact on survival after whole-brain radiotherapy for brain metastases?
    Nieder, Carsten
    Andratschke, Nicolaus H.
    Spanne, Oddvar
    Geinitz, Hans
    Grosu, Anca L.
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 13 (12) : 885 - 888
  • [42] Whole-brain radiotherapy with or without efaproxiral for the treatment of brain metastases: Determinants of response and its prognostic value for subsequent survival
    Stea, B
    Suh, JH
    Boyd, AP
    Cagnoni, PJ
    Shaw, E
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 64 (04): : 1023 - 1030
  • [43] The Results of Whole-brain Radiotherapy for Elderly Patients With Brain Metastases from Urinary Bladder Cancer
    Rades, Dirk
    Trang Nguyen
    Schild, Steven E.
    IN VIVO, 2020, 34 (03): : 1317 - 1320
  • [44] Neurosurgical management and postoperative whole-brain radiotherapy for colorectal cancer patients with symptomatic brain metastases
    Giuseppe Aprile
    Elisa Zanon
    Francesco Tuniz
    Emiliana Iaiza
    Federica De Pauli
    Nicoletta Pella
    Stefano Pizzolitto
    Alberto Buffoli
    Andrea Piga
    Miran Skrap
    Gianpiero Fasola
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 2009, 135
  • [45] Dose Escalation in Patients Receiving Whole-Brain Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases from Colorectal Cancer
    Heisterkamp, Christine
    Haatanen, Tiina
    Schild, Steven E.
    Rades, Dirk
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2010, 186 (02) : 70 - 75
  • [46] Whole-Brain Radiotherapy (WBRT) for Brain Metastases: Does the Interval Between Imaging and Treatment Matter?
    Hansen, Heinke C.
    Janssen, Stefan
    Thieme, Cathrin
    Perlov, Aleksej
    Schild, Steven E.
    Rades, Dirk
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 38 (12) : 6835 - 6840
  • [47] Neurosurgical management and postoperative whole-brain radiotherapy for colorectal cancer patients with symptomatic brain metastases
    Aprile, Giuseppe
    Zanon, Elisa
    Tuniz, Francesco
    Iaiza, Emiliana
    De Pauli, Federica
    Pella, Nicoletta
    Pizzolitto, Stefano
    Buffoli, Alberto
    Piga, Andrea
    Skrap, Miran
    Fasola, Gianpiero
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 135 (03) : 451 - 457
  • [48] Whole-Brain Radiotherapy Combined with Surgery or Stereotactic Radiotherapy in Patients with Brain Oligometastases
    D'Agostino, Giuseppe Roberto
    Autorino, Rosa
    Pompucci, Angelo
    De Santis, Maria Carmen
    Manfrida, Stefania
    Di Lella, Giuseppe
    Mantini, Giovanna
    Frascino, Vincenzo
    Chiesa, Silvia
    Albanese, Alessio
    Dinapoli, Nicola
    Azario, Luigi
    Fiorentino, Alba
    Valentini, Vincenzo
    Anile, Carmelo
    Balducci, Mario
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2011, 187 (07) : 421 - 425
  • [49] Anlotinib combined with whole-brain radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer with multiple brain metastases that progressed or developed after at least one lines of prior treatment
    Kong, Cheng
    Yu, Shaorong
    Qian, Pudong
    Song, Xue
    Wen, Jing
    Jiang, Ming
    Zhu, Jun
    Xu, Jianhua
    Zhao, Lijun
    Guo, Zhen
    Wu, Jianfeng
    He, Xia
    Zhu, Xiangzhi
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [50] Treatment of brain metastases of renal cell cancer with combined hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy and whole brain radiotherapy with hippocampal sparing
    Vrana, David
    Studentova, Hana
    Matzenauer, Marcel
    Vlachova, Zuzana
    Cwiertka, Karel
    Gremlica, David
    Kalita, Ondrej
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2016, 11 (06) : 3777 - 3781