The effects of seasonal climate change on the safflower genotypes productivity under Central Anatolian conditions

被引:0
作者
Koc, Hasan [1 ]
机构
[1] Bahri Dagdas Int Agr Res Inst, Dept Field Crops, Konya, Turkiye
关键词
climate change; drought; GDD (growing degree days); safflower; seed yield; CARTHAMUS-TINCTORIUS L; WATER-DEFICIT; DROUGHT STRESS; YIELD; GROWTH; TOLERANCE; PLANTS; IMPACT; DATE;
D O I
10.1002/aocs.12886
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
This study aimed to investigate the effect of seasonal climate change on safflower genotypes productivity in Central Anatolian conditions during 2021 and 2022. The research focused on seed yield, oil content, and oil yield, considering variations in growing degree days (GDD) at different growth stages. In both years, seed yield was significantly affected by lack of rainfall. In 2021, safflower genotypes had an average seed yield of 1540 kg ha(-1), while in 2022, it increased to 2390 kg ha(-1) due to higher rainfall during critical growth stages. Different genotypes showed different performances in seed yield each year, highlighting the importance of selecting drought-tolerant genotypes for breeding programmes. Oil content also showed significant variations between genotypes and years. Drought stress during flowering and seed filling periods generally led to a decrease in safflower oil content. However, in 2021, despite drought during the seedling stage, there was an increase in average oil content, possibly due to compensatory mechanisms related to reduced seed yield and dry matter content. In addition, the study looked at GDD values at different growth stages and found considerable variation among genotypes in GDD accumulation. Genotypes with higher GDD accumulation tended to have higher seed and oil yields, indicating better stress tolerance. Conversely, early maturing genotypes with lower GDD levels were better suited for regions with lower average temperatures. The results highlight the importance of considering both rainfall and temperature factors when selecting safflower genotypes for specific regions. In conclusion, the study highlights the impact of seasonal climate change on safflower productivity and the need to develop new safflower varieties capable of adapting to the predicted hotter and drier conditions due to climate change.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 304
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] A scoping review of adoption of climate-resilient crops by small-scale producers in low- and middle-income countries
    Acevedo, Maricelis
    Pixley, Kevin
    Zinyengere, Nkulumo
    Meng, Sisi
    Tufan, Hale
    Cichy, Karen
    Bizikova, Livia
    Isaacs, Krista
    Ghezzi-Kopel, Kate
    Porciello, Jaron
    [J]. NATURE PLANTS, 2020, 6 (10) : 1231 - +
  • [2] Aeini Mitra, 2018, Crop Research (Hisar), V53, P45, DOI 10.5958/2454-1761.2018.00007.4
  • [3] Evaluation of Yield-Based Drought Tolerance Indices for Screening Safflower Genotypes
    Bahrami, Forouzan
    Arzani, Ahmad
    Karimi, Vahid
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2014, 106 (04) : 1219 - 1224
  • [4] Baydar H., 1993, AKDENIZ U ZIRAAT FAK, V5, P75
  • [5] Physiological response and productivity of safflower lines under water deficit and rehydration
    Bortolheiro, Fernanda P. A. P.
    Silva, Marcelo A.
    [J]. ANAIS DA ACADEMIA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIAS, 2017, 89 (04): : 3051 - 3066
  • [6] The Agony of Choice: How Plants Balance Growth and Survival under Water-Limiting Conditions
    Claeys, Hannes
    Inze, Dirk
    [J]. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2013, 162 (04) : 1768 - 1779
  • [7] Effects of planting date, genotype, and their interactions on sunflower yield: II. Components of oil yield
    de la Vega, AJ
    Hall, AJ
    [J]. CROP SCIENCE, 2002, 42 (04) : 1202 - 1210
  • [8] Eslam BP, 2011, J AGR SCI TECH-IRAN, V13, P327
  • [9] Farooq M, 2009, SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE, P153, DOI [10.1007/978-90-481-2666-8_12, 10.1051/agro:2008021]
  • [10] Description of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) phenological growth stages according to the extended BBCH scale
    Flemmer, A. C.
    Franchini, M. C.
    Lindstroem, L. I.
    [J]. ANNALS OF APPLIED BIOLOGY, 2015, 166 (02) : 331 - 339