Artificial intelligence: revolutionizing robotic surgery: review

被引:7
作者
Iftikhar, Muhammad [1 ]
Saqib, Muhammad [1 ]
Zareen, Muhammad [1 ]
Mumtaz, Hassan [2 ]
机构
[1] MTI KTH, Dept Surg, Peshawar, Pakistan
[2] BPP Univ, London, England
来源
ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY | 2024年 / 86卷 / 09期
关键词
artificial intelligence; computers; haptic technology; robotic surgical procedures; surgeons; COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION; TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; EVOLUTION; OUTCOMES; REALITY; ARTERY;
D O I
10.1097/MS9.0000000000002426
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Robotic surgery, known for its minimally invasive techniques and computer-controlled robotic arms, has revolutionized modern medicine by providing improved dexterity, visualization, and tremor reduction compared to traditional methods. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into robotic surgery has further advanced surgical precision, efficiency, and accessibility. This paper examines the current landscape of AI-driven robotic surgical systems, detailing their benefits, limitations, and future prospects. Initially, AI applications in robotic surgery focused on automating tasks like suturing and tissue dissection to enhance consistency and reduce surgeon workload. Present AI-driven systems incorporate functionalities such as image recognition, motion control, and haptic feedback, allowing real-time analysis of surgical field images and optimizing instrument movements for surgeons. The advantages of AI integration include enhanced precision, reduced surgeon fatigue, and improved safety. However, challenges such as high development costs, reliance on data quality, and ethical concerns about autonomy and liability hinder widespread adoption. Regulatory hurdles and workflow integration also present obstacles. Future directions for AI integration in robotic surgery include enhancing autonomy, personalizing surgical approaches, and refining surgical training through AI-powered simulations and virtual reality. Overall, AI integration holds promise for advancing surgical care, with potential benefits including improved patient outcomes and increased access to specialized expertise. Addressing challenges and promoting responsible adoption are essential for realizing the full potential of AI-driven robotic surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:5401 / 5409
页数:9
相关论文
共 103 条
  • [1] Pierson HA, 2017, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:1707.07217
  • [2] accessdata, Da Vinci Robotic System: Food and Drug Administration
  • [3] Autonomy in Surgical Robotics
    Attanasio, Aleks
    Scaglioni, Bruno
    De Momi, Elena
    Fiorini, Paolo
    Valdastri, Pietro
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF CONTROL, ROBOTICS, AND AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS, VOL 4, 2021, 2021, 4 : 651 - 679
  • [4] Robotic Low Ligation of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery for Rectal Cancer Using the Firefly Technique
    Bae, Sung Uk
    Min, Byung Soh
    Kim, Nam Kyu
    [J]. YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 56 (04) : 1028 - 1035
  • [5] Current status of robot-assisted gastric surgery
    Baek, Se-Jin
    Lee, Dong-Woo
    Park, Sung-Soo
    Kim, Seon-Hahn
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 3 (10) : 137 - 143
  • [6] Artificial intelligence in knee arthroplasty: current concept of the available clinical applications
    Batailler, Cecile
    Shatrov, Jobe
    Sappey-Marinier, Elliot
    Servien, Elvire
    Parratte, Sebastien
    Lustig, Sebastien
    [J]. ARTHROPLASTY, 2022, 4 (01)
  • [7] MAKO CT-based robotic arm-assisted system is a reliable procedure for total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review
    Batailler, Cecile
    Fernandez, Andrea
    Swan, John
    Servien, Elvire
    Haddad, Fares S.
    Catani, Fabio
    Lustig, Sebastien
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2021, 29 (11) : 3585 - 3598
  • [8] Artificial Intelligence in Urologic Robotic Oncologic Surgery: A Narrative Review
    Bellos, Themistoklis
    Manolitsis, Ioannis
    Katsimperis, Stamatios
    Juliebo-Jones, Patrick
    Feretzakis, Georgios
    Mitsogiannis, Iraklis
    Varkarakis, Ioannis
    Somani, Bhaskar K.
    Tzelves, Lazaros
    [J]. CANCERS, 2024, 16 (09)
  • [9] The benefits of haptic feedback in robot assisted surgery and their moderators: a meta-analysis
    Bergholz, Max
    Ferle, Manuel
    Weber, Bernhard M.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [10] Artificial intelligence in cancer imaging: Clinical challenges and applications
    Bi, Wenya Linda
    Hosny, Ahmed
    Schabath, Matthew B.
    Giger, Maryellen L.
    Birkbak, Nicolai J.
    Mehrtash, Alireza
    Allison, Tavis
    Arnaout, Omar
    Abbosh, Christopher
    Dunn, Ian F.
    Mak, Raymond H.
    Tamimi, Rulla M.
    Tempany, Clare M.
    Swanton, Charles
    Hoffmann, Udo
    Schwartz, Lawrence H.
    Gillies, Robert J.
    Huang, Raymond Y.
    Aerts, Hugo J. W. L.
    [J]. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2019, 69 (02) : 127 - 157