The Dynamics of Abusive Relationships

被引:2
作者
Adams, Abi [1 ]
Huttunen, Kristiina [2 ]
Nix, Emily [3 ]
Zhang, Ning [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Oxford, England
[2] Aalto Univ, Aalto, Finland
[3] Univ Southern Calif, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
基金
欧洲研究理事会; 欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE; DOMESTIC VIOLENCE; ECONOMIC ABUSE; UNEMPLOYMENT; LIVES; GAP; LAW;
D O I
10.1093/qje/qjae022
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Domestic abuse encompasses a range of damaging behaviors beyond physical violence, including economic and emotional abuse. We analyze the impact of cohabiting with an abusive partner on victims' economic outcomes. In so doing, we highlight the systematic role of economic suppression in such relationships. Using Finnish administrative data and a matched-control event-study design, along with a within-individual comparison of outcomes across relationships, we document three new facts. First, women who begin relationships with (eventually) physically abusive men suffer large and significant earnings and employment falls immediately upon cohabiting with the abusive partner. Second, the decline in economic outcomes is non-monotonic in women's pre-cohabitation outside options. Third, men who are violent against women in any capacity impose economic costs on all their female partners, even those who do not report physical violence. To rationalize these findings, we develop a new dynamic model of abusive relationships where women do not perfectly observe their partner's type, and abusive men have an incentive to use economic suppression to sabotage women's outside options and their ability to later exit the relationship.
引用
收藏
页码:2135 / 2180
页数:46
相关论文
共 53 条
[11]   Scaring or Scarring? Labor Market Effects of Criminal Victimization [J].
Bindler, Anna ;
Ketel, Nadine .
JOURNAL OF LABOR ECONOMICS, 2022, :939-970
[12]   Terror as a bargaining instrument: A case study of dowry violence in rural India [J].
Bloch, F ;
Rao, V .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2002, 92 (04) :1029-1043
[13]   Public Transfers and Domestic Violence: The Roles of Private Information and Spousal Control [J].
Bobonis, Gustavo J. ;
Gonzalez-Brenes, Melissa ;
Castro, Roberto .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-ECONOMIC POLICY, 2013, 5 (01) :179-205
[14]   Domestic violence, employment, and divorce [J].
Bowlus, Audra J. ;
Seitz, Shannon .
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2006, 47 (04) :1113-1149
[15]   Domestic Violence and Divorce Law: When Divorce Threats Become Credible [J].
Brassiolo, Pablo .
JOURNAL OF LABOR ECONOMICS, 2016, 34 (02) :443-477
[16]   COVID-19 and Crime Effects of Stay-at-Home Orders on Domestic Violence [J].
Bullinger, Lindsey Rose ;
Carr, Jillian B. ;
Packham, Analisa .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2021, 7 (03) :249-280
[17]  
Calvi R., 2023, Review of Economics and Statistics, P1, DOI [10.1162/resta01399, DOI 10.1162/RESTA01399]
[18]   FAMILY VIOLENCE AND FOOTBALL: THE EFFECT OF UNEXPECTED EMOTIONAL CUES ON VIOLENT BEHAVIOR [J].
Card, David ;
Dahl, Gordon B. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2011, 126 (01) :103-143
[19]  
Chang Harrison., 2023, AVAILABLE SSRN 44756
[20]  
Deniz Sanin, PAID WORK WOME DOMES