Is it feasible to develop a supervised learning algorithm incorporating spinopelvic mobility to predict impingement in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty?

被引:2
作者
Fontalis, A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhao, B. [3 ]
Putzeys, P. [4 ]
Mancino, F. [1 ]
Zhang, S. [3 ]
Vanspauwen, T. [4 ]
Glod, F. [4 ]
Plastow, R. [1 ]
Mazomenos, E. [3 ]
Haddad, F. S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Hosp, Dept Trauma & Orthopaed Surg, London, England
[2] Univ Coll London Hosp, Div Surg & Intervent Sci, London, England
[3] UCL, Wellcome EPSRC Ctr Intervent & Surg Sci, London, England
[4] Hop Robert Schuman, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
来源
BONE & JOINT OPEN | 2024年 / 5卷 / 08期
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 英国惠康基金;
关键词
ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; SAFE ZONE; RISK; DISLOCATION; NAVIGATION; PLACEMENT; ANATOMY; RANGE;
D O I
10.1302/2633-1462.58.BJO-2024-0020.R1
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims Precise implant positioning, tailored to individual spinopelvic biomechanics and phenotype, is paramount for stability in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Despite a few studies on instability prediction, there is a notable gap in research utilizing artificial intelligence (AI). The objective of our pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility of developing an AI algorithm tailored to individual spinopelvic mechanics and patient phenotype for predicting impingement. Methods This international, multicentre prospective cohort study across two centres encompassed 157 adults undergoing primary robotic arm-assisted THA. Impingement during specific flexion and extension stances was identified using the virtual range of motion (ROM) tool of the robotic software. The primary AI model, the Light Gradient-Boosting Machine (LGBM), used tabular data to predict impingement presence, direction (flexion or extension), and type. A secondary model integrating tabular data with plain anteroposterior pelvis radiographs was evaluated to assess for any potential enhancement in prediction accuracy. Results We identified nine predictors from an analysis of baseline spinopelvic characteristics and surgical planning parameters. Using fivefold cross-validation, the LGBM achieved 70.2% impingement prediction accuracy. With impingement data, the LGBM estimated direction with 85% accuracy, while the support vector machine (SVM) determined impingement type with 72.9% accuracy. After integrating imaging data with a multilayer perceptron (tabular) and a convolutional neural network (radiograph), the LGBM's prediction was 68.1%. Both combined and LGBM-only had similar impingement direction prediction rates (around 84.5%). Conclusion This study is a pioneering effort in leveraging AI for impingement prediction in THA, utilizing a comprehensive, real-world clinical dataset. Our machine-learning algorithm demonstrated promising accuracy in predicting impingement, its type, and direction. While the addition of imaging data to our deep-learning algorithm did not boost accuracy, the potential for refined annotations, such as landmark markings, offers avenues for future enhancement. Prior to clinical integration, external validation and larger-scale testing of this algorithm are essential.
引用
收藏
页码:671 / 680
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   What Safe Zone? The Vast Majority of Dislocated THAs Are Within the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Acetabular Component Position [J].
Abdel, Matthew P. ;
von Roth, Philipp ;
Jennings, Matthew T. ;
Hanssen, Arlen D. ;
Pagnano, Mark W. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2016, 474 (02) :386-391
[2]   Low pelvic incidence with low lordosis and distal apex of lumbar lordosis associated with higher rates of abnormal spinopelvic mobility in patients undergoing THA [J].
Aubert, T. ;
Gerard, P. ;
Auberger, G. ;
Rigoulot, G. ;
Riouallon, G. .
BONE & JOINT OPEN, 2023, 4 (09) :668-675
[3]   Requirements and reliability of AI in the medical context [J].
Balagurunathan, Yoganand ;
Mitchell, Ross ;
El Naqa, Issam .
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 83 :72-78
[4]   A Guide to Cross-Validation for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging [J].
Bradshaw, Tyler J. ;
Huemann, Zachary ;
Hu, Junjie ;
Rahmim, Arman .
RADIOLOGY-ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 5 (04)
[5]  
CHANDLER DR, 1982, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P284
[6]   Machine learning models and over-fitting considerations [J].
Charilaou, Paris ;
Battat, Robert .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 28 (05) :605-607
[7]   SUPPORT-VECTOR NETWORKS [J].
CORTES, C ;
VAPNIK, V .
MACHINE LEARNING, 1995, 20 (03) :273-297
[8]  
Dhawan R, 2022, BONE JOINT J, V104B, P820, DOI [10.1302/0301-620x.104b7.bjj-2021-1628.r1, 10.1302/0301-620X.104B7, 10.1302/0301-620X.104B7.BJJ-2021-1628.R1]
[9]  
Divecha HM, 2021, BONE JOINT J, V103B, P1669, DOI [10.1302/0301-620X.103B11.BJJ-2021-0061.R1, 10.1302/0301-620X.103B11.BJJ-2021-0061]
[10]   Stability and Trunnion Wear Potential in Large-diameter Metal-on-Metal Total Hips: A Finite Element Analysis [J].
Elkins, Jacob M. ;
Callaghan, John J. ;
Brown, Thomas D. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2014, 472 (02) :529-542