Updated therapeutic options for human brucellosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:0
|
作者
Huang, Shanjun [1 ]
Xu, Jiaying [2 ]
Wang, Hao [1 ]
Li, Zhuo [1 ]
Song, Ruifang [1 ]
Zhang, Yiting [1 ]
Lu, Menghan [1 ]
Han, Xin [1 ]
Ma, Tian [1 ]
Wang, Yingtong [1 ]
Hao, Jiaxin [1 ]
Song, Shanshan [1 ]
Zhen, Qing [1 ,3 ]
Shui, Tiejun [4 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Key Lab Zoonosis,Minist Educ, Changchun, Jilin, Peoples R China
[2] Dalian Med Univ, Hosp 2, Dalian, Peoples R China
[3] State Key Lab Diag & Treatment Severe Zoonot Infec, Changchun, Peoples R China
[4] Yunnan Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Kunming, Yunnan, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES | 2024年 / 18卷 / 08期
关键词
IN-VITRO ACTIVITIES; DOXYCYCLINE-RIFAMPICIN; ANTIMICROBIAL REGIMENS; ANTIBIOTIC-TREATMENT; STREPTOMYCIN;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pntd.0012405
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background In clinical practice guidelines, there is no consensus about the medications that should be initially offered to patients with brucellosis. To provide informative evidence, we compared and ranked brucellosis medications based on their efficacy and safety.Methods For this systematic review and network meta-analysis, we searched 4 English databases and 3 Chinese databases, from the date of database inception to December 13, 2023. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving children and adolescents with brucellosis, comparing different antibiotic regimens. We excluded studies explicitly targeting patients with spondylitis brucellosis, endocarditis brucellosis, and neuro-brucellosis. The primary outcomes were overall failure (efficacy) and side effects (safety). Secondary outcomes were relapse and therapeutic failure. Pairwise meta-analysis was first examined. Data were analyzed using random effects network meta-analysis, with subgroup and sensitivity analyses performed. The Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) framework was used to assess the certainty of evidence. The protocol was preregistered in PROSPERO (CRD42023491331).Results Of the 11,747 records identified through the database search, 43 RCTs were included in the network meta-analysis. Compared with standard therapy (Doxycycline + Rifampicin), Rifampicin + Tetracyclines (RR 4.96; 95% CI 1.47 to 16.70; very low certainty of evidence), Doxycycline + TMP/SMX (RR 0.18; 95% CI 0.06 to 0.52; low certainty of evidence), Doxycycline + Quinolones (RR 0.27; 95% CI 0.11 to 0.71; low certainty of evidence), Streptomycin + Tetracyclines (RR 0.04; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.16; low certainty of evidence), and Single (RR 0.05; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.16; moderate certainty of evidence) were less efficacious. Doxycycline + Gentamicin ranked the best in efficacy (SUCRA values: 0.94), the second is Triple (SUCRA values: 0.87), and the third is Doxycycline + Streptomycin (SUCRA values: 0.78).Conclusions Brucellosis medications differ in efficacy and safety. Doxycycline + Gentamicin, Triple, and Doxycycline + Streptomycin have superior efficacy and safety. Treatment of brucellosis should strike a balance between efficacy, safety, and cost. Brucellosis, with nearly 500,000 new cases outbreak in more than 170 countries or regions worldwide each year, is a zoonotic infectious disease caused by Brucella. Due to the lack of an effective human vaccine and the impracticality of eradicating brucellosis in animals globally, treatment remains the primary strategy for addressing human brucellosis. However, there is no consensus in clinical practice guidelines regarding the initial medications for brucellosis treatment. Therefore, we compared and ranked brucellosis medications based on their efficacy and safety to aid clinicians in matching risk/benefits of drugs to brucellosis treatment. In this systematic review and network meta-analysis of 43 randomized clinical trials with 4,283 patients, 6 weeks of doxycycline plus 1 to 2 weeks of gentamicin or plus 2 to 3 weeks of streptomycin is the best therapy for human brucellosis. Six weeks of rifampicin plus quinolones treatment is considered as an alternative therapy. If finances allow, consider triple therapy. Single, Streptomycin + Tetracyclines, Streptomycin + TMP/SMX, and Rifampicin + TMP/SMX therapies cannot currently be recommended.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Medical therapy options for endometriosis related pain, which is better? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Samy, Ahmed
    Taher, Ayman
    Sileem, Sileem A.
    Abdelhakim, Ahmed Mohamed
    Fathi, Mohamed
    Haggag, Hisham
    Ashour, Khaled
    Ahmed, Shady Abdelsattar
    Shareef, Mohammad Abrar
    AlAmodi, Abdulhadi A.
    Keshta, Nawal Hamdy Ahmed
    Shatat, Hanan Barakat Abu Elyazid
    Salah, Doaa M.
    Ali, Ahmed Said
    El Kattan, Eman Abdel Monem
    Elsherbini, Moutaz
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2021, 50 (01)
  • [42] Management options for proximal humerus fractures - A systematic review & network meta-analysis of randomized control trials
    Davey, Martin S.
    Hurley, Eoghan T.
    Anil, Utkarsh
    Condren, Saorise
    Kearney, Jack
    O'Tuile, Cathal
    Gaafar, Mohammed
    Mullett, Hannan
    Pauzenberger, Leo
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2022, 53 (02): : 244 - 249
  • [43] SYSTEMATIC REVIEW WITH NETWORK META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS OF ROTATOR CUFF TEAR TREATMENT
    Kim, Seihee
    Hwang, Jinseub
    Kim, Min Jee
    Lim, Jae-Young
    Lee, Woo Hyung
    Choi, Ji Eun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2018, 34 (01) : 78 - 86
  • [44] Efficacy and safety of antiscabietic agents: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Thadanipon, Kunlawat
    Anothaisintawee, Thunyarat
    Rattanasiri, Sasivimol
    Thakkinstian, Ammarin
    Attia, John
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2019, 80 (05) : 1435 - 1444
  • [45] Essential oils for treating anxiety: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and network meta-analysis
    Tan, Ling
    Liao, Fei-fei
    Long, Lin-zi
    Ma, Xiao-chang
    Peng, Yu-xuan
    Lu, Jie-ming
    Qu, Hua
    Fu, Chang-geng
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 11
  • [46] Effectiveness of bariatric surgical procedures A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Kang, Jenny H.
    Le, Quang A.
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (46)
  • [47] Effectiveness and complication of achalasia treatment: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Gong, Fangxiao
    Li, Yuanyuan
    Ye, Sen
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 46 (01) : 24 - 34
  • [48] Pain management in shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Xiao, Michelle
    Cohen, Samuel A.
    Cheung, Emilie V.
    Freehill, Michael T.
    Abrams, Geoffrey D.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2021, 30 (11) : 2638 - 2647
  • [49] Adhesive strategies in cervical lesions: systematic review and a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Fabiana Dias Simas Dreweck
    Adrieli Burey
    Marcelo de Oliveira Dreweck
    Alessandro D. Loguercio
    Alessandra Reis
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2021, 25 : 2495 - 2510
  • [50] Adhesive strategies in cervical lesions: systematic review and a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Dreweck, Fabiana Dias Simas
    Burey, Adrieli
    de Oliveira Dreweck, Marcelo
    Loguercio, Alessandro D.
    Reis, Alessandra
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 25 (05) : 2495 - 2510