Knowledge boundaries for implementation of quality improvement interventions; a qualitative study

被引:0
作者
Lyng, Hilda Bo [1 ]
Stromme, Torunn [1 ]
Ree, Eline [1 ]
Johannessen, Terese [2 ]
Wiig, Siri [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stavanger, Fac Hlth Sci, SHARE Ctr Resilience Healthcare, Stavanger, Norway
[2] Univ Agder, Fac Hlth & Sports Sci, Dept Hlth & Nursing Sci, Kristiansand, Norway
来源
FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES | 2024年 / 4卷
关键词
knowledge boundaries; implementation; quality improvement; interventions; nursing homes; homecare services; HEALTH-CARE; MANAGING KNOWLEDGE; OBJECTS; INNOVATION; TRANSFORMATION; ADOPTION;
D O I
10.3389/frhs.2024.1294299
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Implementation and adoption of quality improvement interventions have proved difficult, even in situations where all participants recognise the relevance and benefits of the intervention. One way to describe difficulties in implementing new quality improvement interventions is to explore different types of knowledge boundaries, more specifically the syntactic, semantic and pragmatic boundaries, influencing the implementation process. As such, this study aims to identify and understand knowledge boundaries for implementation processes in nursing homes and homecare services.Methods An exploratory qualitative methodology was used for this study. The empirical data, including individual interviews (n = 10) and focus group interviews (n = 10) with leaders and development nurses, stem from an externally driven leadership intervention and a supplementary tracer project entailing an internally driven intervention. Both implementations took place in Norwegian nursing homes and homecare services. The empirical data was inductively analysed in accordance with grounded theory.Results The findings showed that the syntactic boundary included boundaries like the lack of meeting arenas, and lack of knowledge transfer and continuity in learning. Furthermore, the syntactic boundary was mostly related to the dissemination and training of staff across the organisation. The semantic boundary consisted of boundaries such as ambiguity, lack of perceived impact for practice and lack of appropriate knowledge. This boundary mostly related to uncertainty of the facilitator role. The pragmatic boundary included boundaries related to a lack of ownership, resistance, feeling unsecure, workload, different perspectives and a lack of support and focus, reflecting a change of practices.Discussion This study provides potential solutions for traversing different knowledge boundaries and a framework for understanding knowledge boundaries related to the implementation of quality interventions.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Theory at a glance: A guide for health promotion practice
[2]   SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE [J].
BANDURA, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) :191-215
[3]   Two Decades Since To Err Is Human: An Assessment Of Progress And Emerging Priorities In Patient Safety [J].
Bates, David W. ;
Singh, Hardeep .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2018, 37 (11) :1736-1743
[4]   Object lessons: Workplace artifacts as representations of occupational jurisdiction [J].
Bechky, BA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2003, 109 (03) :720-752
[5]   Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor [J].
Bechky, BA .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2003, 14 (03) :312-330
[6]  
Berthelsen C.B., 2018, International Journal of Health Sciences, V6, P64, DOI [10.15640/ijhs.v6n1a8, DOI 10.15640/IJHS.V6N1A8]
[7]   Changing how we think about healthcare improvement [J].
Braithwaite, Jeffrey .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 361
[8]   Key factors influencing adoption of an innovation in primary health care: a qualitative study based on implementation theory [J].
Carlfjord, Siw ;
Lindberg, Malou ;
Bendtsen, Preben ;
Nilsen, Per ;
Andersson, Agneta .
BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2010, 11
[9]   Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries [J].
Carlile, PR .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2004, 15 (05) :555-568
[10]   A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development [J].
Carlile, PR .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2002, 13 (04) :442-455