A review of worldviews beyond sustainability Potential avenues for human-nature connectedness

被引:4
作者
Fitzpatrick, Haley [1 ]
机构
[1] Oslo Sch Architecture & Design, Inst Design, Maridalsveien 29, N-0175 Oslo, Norway
来源
VISIONS FOR SUSTAINABILITY | 2023年 / 19期
关键词
mental models; awareness; knowledge system; systems-thinking; indigenous knowledge; complexity; LEVERAGE POINTS; RELATIONAL THINKING; INDIGENOUS PEOPLES; SCIENCE-EDUCATION; MINDFULNESS; VALUES; PERSPECTIVE; STEWARDSHIP; KNOWLEDGE; REPRESENTATION;
D O I
10.13135/2384-8677/7309
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Although there is increasing awareness of worldviews as leverage points for transformative change, deeper understanding of the nuances between worldviews and how they frame complex human-nature relationships is needed. This review paper aims to synthesize current literature on how sustainability can be conceptualized across diverse worldviews. A quantitative database search was used to review peer-reviewed Englishspeaking scholarship. A qualitative content analysis was conducted to identify key knowledge themes and shared concepts. The results indicated overwhelming support for human-nature connectedness expressed uniquely across six identified knowledge themes. Shared concepts were found across each of these knowledge types and illustrated through a matrix of examples from the literature. This review paper synthesizes and connects transdisciplinary concepts through concrete examples, highlights gaps, and offers future research directions around activating reflexivity on worldviews. It also provides critical discussion on the limitations of conducting a literature review on the vast and complex topic of worldviews and sustainability. The combination of these contributions could provide readers with an entry point in expanding their own worldviews, as a supportive process to the larger-scale systems change needed for sustainability transformations.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 57
页数:49
相关论文
共 219 条
  • [1] Abi-Hashem N., 2017, Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion, P1, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-27771-99357-6, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-27771-99357-6]
  • [2] Abram D., 1996, SPELL SENSUOUS PERCE
  • [3] Abram D., 2020, Routledge handbook of ecocultural identity, P5, DOI [10.4324/9781351068840-1, DOI 10.4324/9781351068840-1]
  • [4] Being awake to Ma: designing in between-ness as a way of becoming with
    Akama, Yoko
    [J]. CODESIGN-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COCREATION IN DESIGN AND THE ARTS, 2015, 11 (3-4): : 262 - 274
  • [5] Akama Yoko., 2014, 13th Participatory Design Conference, P21, DOI [DOI 10.13140/2.1.3189.0565, 10.1145/2662155.2662179, DOI 10.1145/2662155.2662179]
  • [7] Relational thinking and relational reasoning: harnessing the power of patterning
    Patricia A Alexander
    [J]. npj Science of Learning, 1 (1)
  • [8] Synergy of systems theory and symbolic interactionism: a passageway for non-Indigenous researchers that facilitates better understanding Indigenous worldviews and knowledges
    Ali, Tahir
    Buergelt, Petra T.
    Maypilama, Elaine Lawurrpa
    Paton, Douglas
    Smith, James A.
    Jehan, Noor
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2022, 25 (02) : 197 - 212
  • [9] Allevato E., 2018, The Spirit of Sustainability BT - Handbook of Engaged Sustainability, P169, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-71312-017, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-71312-017]
  • [10] Alterado DS, 2015, PHILOS-INT J PHILOS, V16, P127