The process model of self-control: Developing a measure of self-control strategies

被引:0
作者
Milosevic, Mina [1 ]
Converse, Patrick D. [1 ]
Moon, Nicholas A. [2 ]
Fedele, Dominic [1 ]
McFerran, Michael W. [1 ]
al-Qallawi, Sherif [3 ]
机构
[1] Florida Inst Technol, Melbourne, FL USA
[2] Calif State Univ San Bernardino, San Bernardino, CA USA
[3] Boston Consulting Grp Inc, Boston, MA USA
来源
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW-PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE-REVUE INTERNATIONALE | 2025年 / 74卷 / 01期
关键词
measure development; process model of self-control; self-control strategies; EMOTION REGULATION; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; MECHANICAL TURK; PERSONALITY; AVOIDANCE; BEHAVIOR; SCHOOL; DELAY;
D O I
10.1111/apps.12566
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The purpose of this research was to develop and examine a measure of self-control strategies, proposed in the process model of self-control. Across three studies (N = 1045), we developed and refined items, examined scale dimensionality and relationships with orbiting constructs, and assessed criterion-related validity. Findings provide initial support for a 34-item measure of six self-control strategies: five strategies that were theoretically proposed in the process model and one that emerged empirically from our data. The proposed Self-Control Strategies Scale was significantly correlated with other similar measures and demonstrated expected relationships with orbiting constructs and criterion-related validity. This measure may be useful in expanding our understanding of different strategies beneficial for long-term goal pursuit.
引用
收藏
页数:34
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   MTurk Research: Review and Recommendations [J].
Aguinis, Herman ;
Villamor, Isabel ;
Ramani, Ravi S. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2021, 47 (04) :823-837
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, DIVISION NUTR PHYS A
[3]   THE PROACTIVE COMPONENT OF ORGANIZATIONAL-BEHAVIOR - A MEASURE AND CORRELATES [J].
BATEMAN, TS ;
CRANT, JM .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 1993, 14 (02) :103-118
[4]  
Brown T.A., 2015, ThE GUILFORD PRESS
[5]   Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data? [J].
Buhrmester, Michael ;
Kwang, Tracy ;
Gosling, Samuel D. .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 6 (01) :3-5
[6]   Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon's MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing [J].
Casler, Krista ;
Bickel, Lydia ;
Hackett, Elizabeth .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2013, 29 (06) :2156-2160
[7]   Modeling General and Specific Variance in Multifaceted Constructs: A Comparison of the Bifactor Model to Other Approaches [J].
Chen, Fang Fang ;
Hayes, Adele ;
Carver, Charles S. ;
Laurenceau, Jean-Philippe ;
Zhang, Zugui .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2012, 80 (01) :219-251
[8]   Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale [J].
Chen, G ;
Gully, SM ;
Eden, D .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2001, 4 (01) :62-83
[9]   An MTurk Crisis? Shifts in Data Quality and the Impact on Study Results [J].
Chmielewski, Michael ;
Kucker, Sarah C. .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE, 2020, 11 (04) :464-473
[10]  
Clark M. S., 2017, OXFORD HDB SITUATION, DOI [10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190263348.013,5, DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190263348.013,5]