Fluctuating cohesion: A grounded theory study of nursing students engaged in a combined debriefing format

Aim: This study explored the social processes enacted by nursing students when they engage in a combined format of structured peer debriefing followed by instructor-led debriefing after in-person simulation. The aim was to gain insight into nursing students' perceptions and how peer processes influenced reflection and learning. Background: Debriefing, a key component of clinical simulation, promotes development of nursing students' reflective processes and enhances learning. In-person group-debriefing led by faculty/instructors is the most used debriefing format in healthcare simulation education. Yet, recent studies indicate instructor-led formats may increase students' anxiety and limit their capacity for reflection, a crucial step in clinical reasoning and decision making. Investigations into learner-centered formats support peer debriefing as a reasonable alternative to traditional instructor-led debriefing. However, current peer debriefing studies provide little insight into the social interactions and processes supporting reflection and learning; and little theoretical basis exists for the integration of alternatives to instructor-led debriefing formats (such as peer debriefing) into simulation-based education. Design: This qualitative study used a Straussian grounded theory design. Methods: Senior-level baccalaureate and associate degree nursing students from an U.S. public university with first-hand experience using the combined format of peer debriefing followed by instructor-led debriefing were recruited to participate in focus-group interviews. Data gathered from semi structured interviews were analysed using the iterative process of constant comparison. Theory building was aided using memoing, theoretical sampling and conceptual diagramming. Results: The sample consisted of 34 students. Study findings revealed the core category of the constructed theory, 'Fluctuating cohesion', involved students' pervasive sense of going back and forth between a sense of unity (weness) and separatism (me-ness) while engaged in the combined debriefing format. The theory integrated five related categories: discovering the process, normalizing experiences, developing mutuality, dynamic balancing and engaging informal social connections. Findings illustrated the processes students enacted to take ownership for learning and proactively discuss their clinical decision-making with the instructor. In turn, reflection was enhanced by increased receptiveness to subsequent expert feedback. Conclusions: The study findings demonstrated that augmenting instructor-led debriefing with peer debriefing leveraged the beneficial nature of peer interactions, promoted psychological safety, facilitated nascent team behaviors and enhanced reflective thinking. The resultant theory that was generated from the findings and grounded in participants' experience, provides a meaningful framework that may inform future learner-centered debriefing formats aimed at optimizing debriefing effectiveness.