Global prevalence of gastric intestinal metaplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Soroorikia, Sara [1 ]
Kazeminia, Mohsen [2 ]
Qaderi, Kowsar [3 ]
Ziapour, Arash [4 ]
Hodhodi, Tahereh [2 ]
Javanbakht, Zahra [5 ]
机构
[1] Kermanshah Univ Med Sci, Student Res Comm, Kermanshah, Iran
[2] Kermanshah Univ Med Sci, Imam Khomeini & Mohammad Kermanshahi & Farabi Hosp, Clin Res Dev Ctr, Kermanshah, Iran
[3] Kermanshah Univ Med Sci, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Dept Midwifery, Kermanshah, Iran
[4] Kermanshah Univ Med Sci, Imam Ali Hosp, Cardiovasc Res Ctr, Kermanshah, Iran
[5] Kermanshah Univ Med Sci, Motazedi Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Obstet & Gynecol,Sch Med, Kermanshah, Iran
关键词
Intestines; Meta-analysis; Metaplasia; Prevalence; Stomach; RISK-FACTORS; ATROPHIC GASTRITIS; POPULATION; SUBTYPES; PYLORI;
D O I
10.1186/s13643-024-02633-x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundGastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) is a precancerous lesion that increases the risk of gastric cancer. Several preliminary studies have examined the prevalence of GIM. The present systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted aimed estimating the global prevalence of GIM.MethodsThe present systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted based on the PRISMA reporting guidelines in the range of 1988-2022. Articles related to the purpose of the study were obtained from Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science (WOS), MagIran, SID databases, and Google Scholar search engine using relevant and validated keywords in MeSH/Emtree. Inclusion criteria were observational articles, access to the full text of the article, and articles that reported prevalence. Heterogeneity among studies was examined using the I2 index. The random effects model was used in this review due to the high heterogeneity between the results of the studies. Data were statistically analyzed using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) software.ResultsIn the initial search, 4946 studies were found, of which 20 articles with a sample size of 57,263 met all the criteria for inclusion in the study. The global prevalence of GIM was 17.5% (95% confidence interval: 14.6-20.8%). The highest percentage of prevalence of GIM belonged to American continent with 18.6% (95% confidence interval: 13.8-24.6%) and patients with gastroesophageal reflux with 22.9% (95% confidence interval: 9.9-44.6%).ConclusionThe results of this study showed that the prevalence of GIM in the world is high and needs further investigation. Therefore, it is recommended to be given more attention by experts, officials, and health policymakers.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] 2019 Global NAFLD Prevalence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Le, Michael H.
    Yeo, Yee Hui
    Li, Xiaohe
    Li, Jie
    Zou, Biyao
    Wu, Yuankai
    Ye, Qing
    Huang, Daniel Q.
    Zhao, Changqing
    Zhang, Jie
    Liu, Chenxi
    Chang, Na
    Xing, Feng
    Yan, Shiping
    Wan, Zi Hui
    Tang, Natasha Sook Yee
    Mayumi, Maeda
    Liu, Xinting
    Liu, Chuanli
    Rui, Fajuan
    Yang, Hongli
    Yang, Yao
    Jin, Ruichun
    Le, Richard H. X.
    Xu, Yayun
    Le, David M.
    Barnett, Scott
    Stave, Christopher Donald
    Cheung, Ramsey
    Zhu, Qiang
    Nguyen, Mindie H.
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2022, 20 (12) : 2809 - +
  • [32] Global prevalence of gingival recession: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yadav, Vikender Singh
    Gumber, Bhumika
    Makker, Kanika
    Gupta, Vandana
    Tewari, Nitesh
    Khanduja, Puneet
    Yadav, Renu
    ORAL DISEASES, 2023, 29 (08) : 2993 - 3002
  • [33] The global prevalence of gallstones in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Salari, Nader
    Hasheminezhad, Razie
    Heidarisharaf, Parisa
    Khaleghi, Ali Asghar
    Azizi, Arezou Haji
    Shohaimi, Shamarina
    Mohammadi, Masoud
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY-X, 2023, 19
  • [34] Global prevalence of aggressive periodontitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bouziane, Amal
    Hamdoun, Radia
    Abouqal, Redouane
    Ennibi, Oumkeltoum
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2020, 47 (04) : 406 - 428
  • [35] The global prevalence of myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nader Salari
    Fatemeh Morddarvanjoghi
    Amir Abdolmaleki
    Shabnam Rasoulpoor
    Ali Asghar Khaleghi
    Leila Afshar Hezarkhani
    Shamarina Shohaimi
    Masoud Mohammadi
    BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 23
  • [36] Global prevalence of suicide by latitude: A systematic review and meta-analysis?
    An, Seongjun
    Lim, Sungju
    Kim, Hyun-Woo
    Kim, Hyung-Sik
    Lee, Dongjun
    Son, Eunjeong
    Kim, Tae Woo
    Goh, Tae Sik
    Kim, Kihun
    Him, Yun Hak
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 81
  • [37] Global Prevalence and Incidence of Tinnitus A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Jarach, Carlotta M.
    Lugo, Alessandra
    Scala, Marco
    van den Brandt, Piet A.
    Cederroth, Christopher R.
    Odone, Anna
    Garavello, Werner
    Schlee, Winfried
    Langguth, Berthold
    Gallus, Silvano
    JAMA NEUROLOGY, 2022, 79 (09) : 888 - 900
  • [38] Global prevalence of Porcine Astrovirus: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ge, Xiaoyu
    Li, Yize
    Zhao, Feipeng
    Ma, Xin'ao
    Li, Jiaxuan
    Jiang, Yanping
    Cui, Wen
    Wang, Xiaona
    Tang, Lijie
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2025, 238
  • [39] Bovine anaplasmosis: A systematic review with meta-analysis on the global prevalence
    Nur-Amalina, N.
    Nur-Sabrina, A. M.
    Muhamad-Ali, H. A. M.
    Basripuzi, N. H.
    TROPICAL BIOMEDICINE, 2023, 40 (04) : 375 - 382
  • [40] Global prevalence of Rett syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Uarda Petriti
    Daniel C. Dudman
    Emil Scosyrev
    Sandra Lopez-Leon
    Systematic Reviews, 12