Scaling Up Mastery Learning with Generative AI Exploring How Generative AI Can Assist in the Generation and Evaluation of Mastery Quiz Questions

被引:1
作者
Hutt, Stephen [1 ]
Hieb, Grayson [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Denver, Denver, CO 80208 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ELEVENTH ACM CONFERENCE ON LEARNING@SCALE, L@S 2024 | 2024年
关键词
Large Language Models; Generative AI; Mastery Learning; Content Generation; Content Evaluation;
D O I
10.1145/3657604.3664699
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Generative AI has the potential to scale a number of educational practices, previously limited by resources. One such instructional approach is mastery learning, a pedagogy emphasizing proficiency before progression that is highly resource (teacher time, materials) intensive. The rise of computer-based instruction offered partial solutions, tailoring student progression and automating some facets of the mastery learning process. This work in progress considers the application of large language models for content generation tailored to mastery learning. We present a paired framework for analyzing and evaluating the generated content relative to rubrics designed by the teacher. Recognizing the potential of large language models, we critically assess the potential of improving mastery-based instruction. We close our discussion by considering the applications and limitations of this approach.
引用
收藏
页码:310 / 314
页数:5
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1997, Handbook of human-computer interaction, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-044481862-1.50103-5
  • [2] Baker RSJD, 2008, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V5091, P406
  • [3] Beck JE., 1996, XRDS CROSSROADS ACM, V3, P11, DOI DOI 10.1145/332148.332153
  • [4] Block J.H., 1976, Review of Research in Education, V4, P3, DOI DOI 10.3102/0091732X004001003
  • [5] Bloom B.S., 1968, Center for the Study of Evaluation of Instructional Programs, V1
  • [6] Good and bad practices in rubrics: the perspectives of students and educators
    Chan, Zenobia
    Ho, Simone
    [J]. ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019, 44 (04) : 533 - 545
  • [7] Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review
    Chen, Lijia
    Chen, Pingping
    Lin, Zhijian
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 (08): : 75264 - 75278
  • [8] CORBETT AT, 1994, USER MODEL USER-ADAP, V4, P253, DOI 10.1007/BF01099821
  • [9] Automatic question generation and answer assessment: a survey
    Das, Bidyut
    Majumder, Mukta
    Phadikar, Santanu
    Sekh, Arif Ahmed
    [J]. RESEARCH AND PRACTICE IN TECHNOLOGY ENHANCED LEARNING, 2021, 16 (01)
  • [10] Ehara Y., 2023, P 16 INT C ED DAT MI, P474, DOI [10.5281/zenodo.8115758, DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.8115758]