Understanding Life-Cycle Greenhouse-Gas Emissions of Shared Electric Micro-Mobility: A Systematic Review

被引:7
作者
Calan, Carlos [1 ]
Sobrino, Natalia [1 ]
Vassallo, Jose Manuel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Madrid, Transport Res Ctr TRANSyT, Madrid 28040, Spain
关键词
shared electric micromobility; life-cycle assessment; systematic literature review; sustainable transport; global warming potential; SCOOTERS;
D O I
10.3390/su16135277
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In recent years, the implementation of shared electric micro-mobility services (SEMMS) enables short rentals of light electric vehicles for short-distance travel. The fast expansion of SEMMS worldwide, promoted as a green mobility service, has raised a debate about its role in urban mobility, especially in terms of environmental impacts such as climate change. This article presents a systematic review of the current knowledge on the environmental impacts of SEMMS, with a special focus on the use of life-cycle assessment (LCA) methods. The study offers a detailed analysis of the global warming potential of SEMMS and its critical phases. It is found that shared e-scooters have the greatest greenhouse-gas emissions during their life cycle, while emissions from shared e-mopeds and shared e-bikes tend to be lower. The literature reveals that the materials and manufacturing phase is the most important one for the environmental impact of shared e-scooters, followed by the daily collection of vehicles for charging. The article also identifies influential factors in the sensitivity analysis and the potential for net-impact reduction accounted for mode substitution. Finally, the article identifies further research areas aimed at contributing to the adoption of environmentally responsible practices in the rapidly expanding field of shared services in cities.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Joint Research Centre-Institute for Environment and Sustainability: International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook-General Guide for Life Cycle Assessment-Detailed Guidance, VFirst
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ISO 14044: 2006
[3]  
Argonne National Laboratory, 2019, GREETs Model: The Greenhouse Gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy Use in Transportation Model
[4]   TRACI 2.0: the tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts 2.0 [J].
Bare, Jane .
CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2011, 13 (05) :687-696
[5]   Life cycle assessment to quantify the impact of technology improvements in bike-sharing systems [J].
Bonilla-Alicea, Ricardo Javier ;
Watson, Bryan C. ;
Shen, Ziheng ;
Tamayo, Laura ;
Telenko, Cassandra .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2020, 24 (01) :138-148
[6]  
Cazzola P., 2020, Good to go? Assessing the environmental performance of new mobility
[7]  
Chester M., 2019, CHESTER ENERGY POLIC
[8]  
CPCD, 2023, Database, China Products Carbon Footprint Factors
[9]   Environmental performance of shared micromobility and personal alternatives using integrated modal LCA [J].
de Bortoli, Anne .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 93
[10]   Consequential LCA for territorial and multimodal transportation policies: method and application to the free-floating e-scooter disruption in Paris [J].
de Bortoli, Anne ;
Christoforou, Zoi .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 273