SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF TRENDS IN THE APPLICATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TO THE FIELD OF ACADEMIC WRITING IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES

被引:0
作者
Martinez-Olmo, Francesc [1 ]
Catalan, Felipe Gonzalez [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Pontificia Univ Catolica Valparaiso, Valparaiso, Chile
来源
DIGITAL EDUCATION REVIEW | 2024年 / 45期
关键词
ChatGPT; Academic writing; Research trend; CHATGPT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The study of the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in academic writing is important to promote efficiency in the generation of scientific content. Additionally, there is a need to investigate how AI can help improve the clarity and accuracy of scientific communication. In this sense, a systematic review of the literature (scoping review) has been carried out that has addressed the use of AI, specifically ChatGPT, in relation to academic writing. The objective is to identify the thematic approaches and inquiry designs applied in the works published on this topic and, thus, guide future projects in this line of research. To carry out this study, we proceeded to locate articles in Web of Science and Scopus. The main results of the work reveal the interest in academic writing and AI in relation to its possible applications, specific tools and the detection of plagiarism, as well as its ethical and responsible use. Besides, this study stated the application of various research methods. The final discussion focuses on how the integration of AI in academic writing poses both opportunities and challenges in terms of ethics, quality and intellectual autonomy.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 42
页数:6
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Alberth A., 2023, Teflin Journal, V34, P337, DOI [10.15639/teflinjournal.v34i2/337-352, DOI 10.15639/TEFLINJOURNAL.V34I2/337-352]
  • [2] Artificial Hallucinations in ChatGPT: Implications in Scientific Writing
    Alkaissi, Hussam
    McFarlane, Samy I.
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (02)
  • [3] Artificial intelligence in scientific writing: a friend or a foe?
    Altmae, Signe
    Sola-Leyva, Alberto
    Salumets, Andres
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2023, 47 (01) : 3 - 9
  • [4] Collaborative Writing Support Tools on the Cloud
    Calvo, Rafael A.
    O'Rourke, Stephen T.
    Jones, Janet
    Yacef, Kalina
    Reimann, Peter
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, 4 (01): : 88 - 97
  • [5] From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing
    Dergaa, Ismail
    Chamari, Karim
    Zmijewski, Piotr
    Saad, Helmi Ben
    [J]. BIOLOGY OF SPORT, 2023, 40 (02) : 615 - 622
  • [6] Distinguishing academic science writing from humans or ChatGPT with over 99% accuracy using off-the-shelf machine learning tools
    Desaire, Heather
    Chua, Aleesa E.
    Isom, Madeline
    Jarosova, Romana
    Hua, David
    [J]. CELL REPORTS PHYSICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 4 (06):
  • [7] Prompt Engineering with ChatGPT: A Guide for Academic Writers
    Giray, Louie
    [J]. ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 51 (12) : 2629 - 2633
  • [8] Artificial intelligence in academic writing: a paradigm-shifting technological advance
    Golan, Roei
    Reddy, Rohit
    Muthigi, Akhil
    Ramasamy, Ranjith
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2023, 20 (06) : 327 - 328
  • [9] Goldbort Robert., 2006, Writing for a Science
  • [10] PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis
    Haddaway, Neal R.
    Page, Matthew J.
    Pritchard, Chris C.
    McGuinness, Luke A.
    [J]. CAMPBELL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, 18 (02)