Nomogram Based on US and Clinicopathologic Characteristics: Axillary Nodal Evaluation Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Node-Positive Breast Cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Huang, Jia-Xin [1 ]
Chen, Yi-Jie [2 ]
Wang, Xue-Yan [1 ]
Huang, Jia-Hui [3 ]
Gan, Ke-Hong [4 ]
Tang, Li-Na [2 ]
Pei, Xiao-Qing [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat sen Univ, Guangdong Prov Clin Res Ctr Canc, Dept Med Ultrasound, State Key Lab Oncol South China,Canc Ctr, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, Peoples R China
[2] Fujian Med Univ, Fujian Canc Hosp, Canc Hosp, Dept Med Ultrasound, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Guangzhou Univ, Inst Artificial Intelligence & Blockchain, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Guangdong Acad Med Sci, Guangdong Prov Peoples Hosp, Dept Med Ultrasound, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Breast neoplasm; Neoadjuvant therapy; Axillary response; Prediction; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; ULTRASOUND; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.clbc.2024.03.005
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
In order to prevent surgical over-treatment of axilla in patients with the conversion of lymph node (LN) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), it is crucial to have accurate axilla staging procedures. This multi-center study is designed to develop a convenient method to predict the axillary response to NAC in breast cancer patients. A total of 1019 patients were randomly assigned to the training and validation groups at a ratio of 7:3. US characteristics of both primary tumors and axillary LNs independently serve as predictors for the axillary response to NAC in breast cancer patients. In the validation cohort, the discrimination of US model (AUC, 0.76) was superior to clinicopathologic model (AUC, 0.68); the combined model (AUC, 0.85) demonstrates strong discriminatory power in predicting nodal pCR. US could indeed play a valuable role in identifying more nonresponders to NAC in axillary LNs. The nomogram, constructed with readily available clinicopathologic features and US characteristics, exhibited a FNR of 16.67% in all patients and 10.53% in patients with triple negative breast cancer. This nomogram might potentially serve as a valuable visual tool to aid clinicians in making informed treatment decisions and optimizing patient care for patients with node-postive breast cancer receiving NAC, especially for the patients with triple negative breast cancer. Background: To develop a convenient modality to predict axillary response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer patients. Materials and Methods: In this multi-center study, a total of 1019 breast cancer patients with biopsy-proven positive lymph node (LN) receiving NAC were randomly assigned to the training and validation groups at a ratio of 7:3. Clinicopathologic and ultrasound (US) characteristics of both primary tumors and LNs were used to develop corresponding prediction models, and a nomogram integrating clinicopathologic and US predictors was generated to predict the axillary response to NAC. Results: Axillary pathological complete response (pCR) was achieved in 47.79% of the patients. The expression of estrogen receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor -2, Ki-67 score, and clinical nodal stage were independent predictors for nodal response to NAC. Location and radiological response of primary tumors, cortical thickness and shape of LNs on US were also significantly associated with nodal pCR. In the validation cohort, the discrimination of US model (area under the curve [AUC], 0.76) was superior to clinicopathologic model (AUC, 0.68); the combined model (AUC, 0.85) demonstrates strong discriminatory power in predicting nodal pCR. Calibration curves of the nomogram based on the combined model demonstrated that substantial agreement can be observed between the predictions and observations. This nomogram showed a false-negative rates of 16.67% in all patients and 10.53% in patients with triple negative breast cancer. Conclusion: Nomogram incorporating routine clinicopathologic and US characteristics can predict nodal pCR and represents a tool to aid in treatment decisions for the axilla after NAC in breast cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页码:e452 / e463.e4
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessment of axillary node status by ultrasound after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer according to breast cancer subtype
    Maeshima, Yurina
    Sakai, Takehiko
    Ogiya, Akiko
    Takahashi, Yoko
    Miyagi, Yumi
    Kokubu, Yumi
    Osako, Tomo
    Ito, Yoshinori
    Takahashi, Shunji
    Ohno, Shinji
    Ueno, Takayuki
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [22] Is Axillary Radiation not Inferior to Axillary Dissection for Sentinel Lymph Node-Positive Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy?
    Khan, Tahsin M.
    Rossi, Alexander J.
    Suman, Vera
    Haffty, Bruce
    Hernandez, Jonathan M.
    Boughey, Judy C.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (03) : 1526 - 1527
  • [23] Comparison of Targeted Axillary Dissection with Sentinel Node Biopsy Alone on Nodal Recurrence for Patients who have Node-Positive Breast Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Boyle, Marissa K.
    Amersi, Farin
    Chung, Alice
    Tseng, Joshua
    Giuliano, Armando E.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2025, : 4847 - 4854
  • [24] Axillary Lymph Node Ultrasound Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Biopsy-Proven Node-Positive Breast Cancer: Results from the SN FNAC Study
    Morency, Dominique
    Dumitra, Sinziana
    Parvez, Elena
    Martel, Karyne
    Basik, Mark
    Robidoux, Andre
    Poirier, Brigitte
    Holloway, Claire M. B.
    Gaboury, Louis
    Sideris, Lucas
    Meterissian, Sarkis
    Boileau, Jean-Francois
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 26 (13) : 4337 - 4345
  • [25] Wire guided localisation for targeted axillary node dissection is accurate in axillary staging in node positive breast cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Balasubramanian, Rajesh
    Morgan, Catrin
    Shaari, Elina
    Kovacs, Tibor
    Pinder, Sarah E.
    Hamed, Hisham
    Sever, Ali R.
    Kothari, Ashutosh
    EJSO, 2020, 46 (06): : 1028 - 1033
  • [26] Risk scoring system for predicting axillary response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in initially node-positive women with breast cancer
    Ouldamer, Lobna
    Chas, Marie
    Arbion, Flavie
    Body, Gilles
    Cirier, Julien
    Ballester, Marcos
    Bendifallah, Sofiane
    Darai, Emile
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2018, 27 (02): : 158 - 165
  • [27] Sentinel Node Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Node-Positive Breast Cancer: Does Axillary Ultrasound Improve Performance?
    Mautner, Starr Koslow
    Cody, Hiram S., III
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (30) : 3375 - +
  • [28] Regional Nodal Irradiation for Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients With Pathologic Negative Nodes After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Schlafstein, Ashley
    Liu, Yuan
    Goyal, Subir
    Kahn, Shannon
    Godette, Karen
    Lin, Jolinta
    Torres, Mylin A.
    Royce, Trevor J.
    Patel, Sagar A.
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2022, 22 (02) : 127 - 135
  • [29] Targeted axillary dissection after neoadjuvant systemic therapy in patients with node-positive breast cancer
    Kanesalingam, Kavitha
    Sriram, Nina
    Heilat, Ghaith
    Ng, E-Ern
    Meybodi, Farid
    Elder, Elisabeth
    Brennan, Meagan
    French, James
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 90 (03) : 332 - 338
  • [30] Evidence-Based Strategies to Minimize the Likelihood of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Clinically Node-Positive Patients Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Woodfin, Ashley A.
    Caudle, Abigail S.
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2023, 32 (04) : 693 - 703