Combination of handgrip strength and high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score predicts survival outcomes in patients with colon cancer

被引:1
|
作者
Shi, Yifan [1 ]
Sun, Yuting [2 ]
Shen, Xiaoming [1 ]
Yang, Zenghui [1 ]
Xu, Binghua [1 ]
Bao, Chuanqing [1 ]
机构
[1] Jiangnan Univ, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Affiliated Hosp, Wuxi, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangnan Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Med Ctr, Wuxi, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION | 2024年 / 11卷
关键词
handgrip strength; HS-mGPS; colon cancer; postoperative survival; nomogram; GRIP STRENGTH; HOSPITALIZED-PATIENTS; CACHEXIA; MORTALITY; SUPERIOR; INDEX; RATIO;
D O I
10.3389/fnut.2024.1421560
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Objective Handgrip strength (HGS) and the high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score (HS-mGPS) are associated with the survival of patients with cancer. However, no studies have investigated the combined effect of HGS and HS-mGPS on the overall survival (OS) of patients with colon cancer. Methods Prospective follow-up data of colon cancer patients undergoing radical resection from April, 2016 to September, 2019 were retrospectively collected. We combined the HGS and HS-mGPS to create a new composite index, HGS-HS-mGPS. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using Cox regression models to assess the association between variables and OS. Risk factors on OS rates were investigated by Cox analyses and the nomogram was constructed using significant predictors and HGS-HS-mGPS. The predictive performance of the nomogram was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve and calibration curve. Results This study included a total of 811 patients, of which 446 (55.0%) were male. The HGS optimal cut-off values of male and female patients were 28.8 and 19.72 kg, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that low HGS and high HS-mGPS were independent risk factors of colon cancer after adjusting confounders (adjusted HR = 3.20; 95% CI: 2.27-4.50; p < 0.001 and adjusted HR = 1.55; 95% CI: 1.12-2.14; p = 0.008 respectively). Patients with low HGS and high HS-mGPS had a 10.76-fold higher mortality risk than those with neither (adjusted HR = 10.76; 95% CI: 5.38-21.54; p < 0.001). A nomogram predicting 1-, 3-, and 5 year OS was constructed based on three clinicopathologic prognostic factors. Importantly, incorporating HGS-HS-mGPS into the nomogram model meaningfully improved the predictive performance. The decision curve analyses demonstrated the application value of the HGS-HS-mGPS nomogram for predicting OS of patients with colon cancer. Conclusion HGS-HS-mGPS is associated with the survival of patients with colon cancer. These findings indicate the usefulness of HGS and HS-mGPS measurements in clinical practice for improving patient assessment, cancer prognosis, and precise intervention.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Glasgow Prognostic Score Predicts Survival Outcomes in Patientswith Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Igawa, Satoshi
    Yamamoto, Hiroki
    Yamada, Kaori
    Akazawa, Yuki
    Manaka, Hiroya
    Yagami, Yuri
    Nakahara, Yoshiro
    Sato, Takashi
    Mitsufuji, Hisashi
    Sasaki, Jiichiro
    Naoki, Katsuhiko
    ONCOLOGY, 2023, 101 (11) : 695 - 704
  • [32] The Glasgow Prognostic Score accurately predicts survival in patients with biliary tract cancer not indicated for surgical resection
    Akira Iwaku
    Akiyoshi Kinoshita
    Hiroshi Onoda
    Nao Fushiya
    Hirokazu Nishino
    Masato Matsushima
    Hisao Tajiri
    Medical Oncology, 2014, 31
  • [33] The combination of handgrip strength and CONUT predicts overall survival in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: A multicenter cohort study
    Jia, Pingping
    Wu, Xiaoxiao
    Shen, Fangqi
    Sun, Kai
    Wang, Xiaolin
    Xu, Guangzhong
    Xu, Hongxia
    Cong, Minghua
    Song, Chunhua
    Shi, Hanping
    CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2024, 43 (09) : 2057 - 2068
  • [34] Prognostic significance of the modified Glasgow prognostic score in elderly patients with gastric cancer
    Kotaro Hirashima
    Masayuki Watanabe
    Hironobu Shigaki
    Yu Imamura
    Satoshi Ida
    Masaaki Iwatsuki
    Takatsugu Ishimoto
    Shiro Iwagami
    Yoshifumi Baba
    Hideo Baba
    Journal of Gastroenterology, 2014, 49 : 1040 - 1046
  • [35] Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score at Recurrence Predicts Poor Survival in Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Patients
    Lv, Yongbin
    Pan, Yinghua
    Dong, Changxia
    Liu, Peiji
    Zhang, Chunping
    Xing, Dong
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2017, 23 : 3780 - 3788
  • [36] Prognostic significance of the modified Glasgow prognostic score in elderly patients with gastric cancer
    Hirashima, Kotaro
    Watanabe, Masayuki
    Shigaki, Hironobu
    Imamura, Yu
    Ida, Satoshi
    Iwatsuki, Masaaki
    Ishimoto, Takatsugu
    Iwagami, Shiro
    Baba, Yoshifumi
    Baba, Hideo
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 49 (06) : 1040 - 1046
  • [37] Utility of the Modified and High-Sensitivity Modified Glasgow Prognostic Scores for Hypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Iuchi, Hiroyuki
    Ohori, Junichiro
    Matsuzaki, Hisahiro
    Kiyama, Satoshi
    Yamashita, Masaru
    OTO OPEN, 2021, 5 (04)
  • [38] The Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score and Survival in Colorectal Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of the Literature
    Petrelli, Fausto
    Barni, Sandro
    Coinu, Andrea
    Bertocchi, Paola
    Borgonovo, Karen
    Cabiddu, Mary
    Ghilardi, Mara
    Zaniboni, Alberto
    REVIEWS ON RECENT CLINICAL TRIALS, 2015, 10 (02) : 135 - 141
  • [39] Sarcopenia with modified Glasgow prognostic score as a predictor of long-term survival in patients with gastric cancer
    Nishi, Masaaki
    Shimada, Mitsuo
    Yoshikawa, Kozo
    Higashijima, Jun
    Nakao, Toshihiro
    Kashihara, Hideya
    Takasu, Chie
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (04)
  • [40] The Glasgow Prognostic Score Predicts Response to Chemotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer
    Wang, Dexing
    Duan, Li
    Tu, Zhiquan
    Yan, Fei
    Zhang, Cuicui
    Li, Xu
    Cao, Yuzhu
    Wen, Hongsheng
    CHEMOTHERAPY, 2015, 61 (04) : 217 - 222