Takeover Threats and Corporate Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Market-Oriented Control Reform in China

被引:0
作者
Wang, Shihao [1 ]
Wang, Tao [2 ]
Wu, Chunxian [2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Jing [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Agr Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China
[2] Shihezi Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Shihezi, Xinjiang, Peoples R China
[3] Shihezi Univ, Res Ctr Corp Governance & Management Innovat, Shihezi, Xinjiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Takeover threats; corporate tax avoidance; market-oriented reform; control market; G32; G34; H26; INFORMATION ASYMMETRY; PERFORMANCE; COMPETITION; MANAGEMENT; OWNERSHIP;
D O I
10.1080/1540496X.2024.2399528
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The passage of the merger and acquisition (M&A) policy introduces a shock to takeover threats, which serve as exogenous factors influencing tax avoidance incentives at the firm level. We investigate the impact of takeover threats induced by market-oriented control reform on corporate tax avoidance through a difference-in-differences (DID) design. Empirical results suggest a strong and negative relationship between takeover threats and corporate tax avoidance, and the findings are robust after various robustness checks and endogeneity discussions. Takeover threats may reduce corporate tax avoidance by mitigating inter-period profit shifting and curbing abnormal related party transactions, supporting the governance channel rather than the pressure channel. In the samples of non-state-owned firms, poor external audit quality, weak regional law enforcement, and a more active M&A market, the negative effect of takeover threats on corporate tax avoidance is more pronounced. Our findings enrich the research by focusing on the role of takeover threats arising from China's market-oriented control reform in constructing cross-sectional variation in tax avoidance.
引用
收藏
页码:641 / 668
页数:28
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Law, finance, and economic growth in China
    Allen, F
    Qian, J
    Qian, MJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 77 (01) : 57 - 116
  • [2] Do Hostile Takeovers Stifle Innovation? Evidence from Antitakeover Legislation and Corporate Patenting
    Atanassov, Julian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2013, 68 (03) : 1097 - 1131
  • [3] Home Country Tax System Characteristics and Corporate Tax Avoidance: International Evidence
    Atwood, T. J.
    Drake, Michael S.
    Myers, James N.
    Myers, Linda A.
    [J]. ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2012, 87 (06) : 1831 - 1860
  • [4] The separation of ownership and control and corporate tax avoidance
    Badertscher, Brad A.
    Katz, Sharon P.
    Rego, Sonja O.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2013, 56 (2-3) : 228 - 250
  • [5] Does takeover activity affect stock price crash risk? Evidence from international M&A laws
    Balachandran, Balasingham
    Huu Nhan Duong
    Hoang Luong
    Nguyen, Lily
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2020, 64
  • [6] Takeover defenses: Entrenchment and efficiency
    Bhojraj, Sanjeev
    Sengupta, Partha
    Zhang, Suning
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2017, 63 (01) : 142 - 160
  • [7] Customer Concentration, Tax Collection Intensity, and Corporate Tax Avoidance
    Cao, Yue
    Hu, Xinyu
    Lu, Yu
    Su, Jun
    [J]. EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2020, 56 (11) : 2563 - 2593
  • [8] Customer-supplier relationships and corporate tax avoidance
    Cen, Ling
    Maydew, Edward L.
    Zhang, Liandong
    Zuo, Luo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 123 (02) : 377 - 394
  • [9] Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms?
    Chen, Shuping
    Chen, Xia
    Cheng, Qiang
    Shevlin, Terry
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 95 (01) : 41 - 61
  • [10] Does Information Asymmetry Affect Corporate Tax Aggressiveness?
    Chen, Tao
    Lin, Chen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 2017, 52 (05) : 2053 - 2081