An exploratory study on a comprehensive set of criteria for facade assessment

被引:0
作者
Zekri, Amirhossein [1 ]
Tarkashvand, Abbas [1 ]
Ekhlassi, Ahmad [1 ]
机构
[1] Iran Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Architecture & Environm Design, Tehran, Iran
来源
CONSTRUCTION INNOVATION-ENGLAND | 2024年
关键词
Facade; Facade assessment; Facade assessment criteria; Facade comprehensive evaluation; Facade performance; Facade decision-making; DECISION-MAKING; LIFE-CYCLE; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; MATERIAL SELECTION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; PERFORMANCE; DESIGN; SUSTAINABILITY; BUILDINGS; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1108/CI-01-2024-0027
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
PurposeThe presentation of all required criteria that a facade should fulfill needs to be revised, particularly considering novel perspectives on facade. This study aims to fill this need because leaving it unsolved leads the specialists to evaluate and design facades based on insufficient data resulting in imprecise decisions in both areas.Design/methodology/approachAn exploratory study was conducted based on library resources to identify and extract the criteria, which were coded openly and axially, and categorized via a new standpoint. Shannon method was also used to analyze categories' frequencies.FindingsIn total, 42 criteria were found and organized in five categories: "Environmental Aspects," "Social Impacts," "Economic Aspects," "Efficiency and Effectiveness" and "Technical Issues." This study adds 20 criteria, including "Natural Resource Depletion" and "Clients' Preferences," to facade assessment criteria compared to previous studies. Compared to similar research, "Technical Aspects" is augmented to this field's categorizations, whereas "Social Impacts" and "Environmental Aspects" are provided in a more extensive way.Research limitations/implicationsThe research proceeded until theoretical saturation; therefore, there is no claim to be the most comprehensive. The findings are instrumental to professionals for making practical decisions. The concentration and frequency of the literature will offer an insight to academics about the pioneering fields of facade development.Originality/valueThis study presents a comprehensive and up-to-date set of facade assessment criteria based on new approaches that see facade as a multifunctional component that must address various requirements beyond aesthetics.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 105 条
[21]   BIM-aided variable fuzzy multi-criteria decision making of low-carbon building measures selection [J].
Chen, L. ;
Pan, W. .
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2016, 27 :222-232
[22]   Sustainable performance criteria for construction method selection in concrete buildings [J].
Chen, Ying ;
Okudan, Guel E. ;
Riley, David R. .
AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 19 (02) :235-244
[23]  
Chen Z., 2007, Multicriteria Decision-Making for the Sustainable Built Environment, Proceedings of the 2006 Whiteknights Workshop on MCDM, P17
[24]  
Chew M.Y.L., 2017, Construction Technology for Tall Buildings
[25]   Evaluating the performance of shading devices and glazing types to promote energy efficiency of residential buildings [J].
Chua, Kian Jon ;
Chou, Siaw Kiang .
BUILDING SIMULATION, 2010, 3 (03) :181-194
[26]  
Corbin J., 2008, Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, V3rd ed., DOI DOI 10.4135/9781452230153
[27]  
Creswell JW., 2022, Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches
[28]   A MCDM framework for site selection of island photovoltaic charging station based on new criteria identification and a hybrid fuzzy approach [J].
Dang, Ruinan ;
Li, Xingmei ;
Li, Chentao ;
Xu, Chuanbo .
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2021, 74
[29]   Multi-criteria decision analysis in building maintainability using analytical hierarchy process [J].
Das, Sutapa ;
Chew, M. Y. L. ;
Poh, Kim Leng .
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2010, 28 (10) :1043-1056
[30]   Comparing contributors to time and cost performance in building projects [J].
Dissanayaka, SM ;
Kumaraswamy, MM .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 1999, 34 (01) :31-42