Cost-Benefit Analysis of Mulch Film Management and Its Policy Implications in Northern China

被引:2
作者
Hao, Aibo [1 ,2 ]
Yin, Changbin [1 ,3 ]
Leonard, Angelique [4 ]
Dogot, Thomas [2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Agr Resources & Reg Planning, State Key Lab Efficient Utilizat Arid & Semiarid A, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Liege, TERRA Teaching & Res Ctr, Econ & Rural Dev Lab, Gembloux Agrobio Tech, B-5030 Gembloux, Belgium
[3] Res Ctr Agr Green Dev China, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Liege, Dept Appl Chem, Lab Chem Engn, B-4000 Liege, Belgium
来源
AGRICULTURE-BASEL | 2024年 / 14卷 / 07期
关键词
mulch film management; cost-benefit analysis; thicker mulch film; biodegradable mulch film; policy implication; AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION; PLASTIC FILM; WASTE;
D O I
10.3390/agriculture14071081
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Agricultural white pollution is a pressing concern in China. However, the efficiency and rationality of the government's subsidies for mulch film management remain ambiguous. To formulate reasonable policies for mulch film management and optimize fiscal resource allocation, the study employs cost-benefit analysis to evaluate the economic performance of mulch film management. Two environmentally friendly measures being primarily proposed in China, namely the application of thicker mulch film (hereinafter referred to as thicker film) and the substitution of biodegradable mulch film (hereinafter referred to as biodegradable film), are selected for analysis, with conventional mulch film (hereinafter referred to as conventional film) serving as the benchmark for comparison. Primary data obtained through field surveys, supplemented by secondary data from national statistics, industry reports, and literature reviews, are used for the study. Results show that thicker film application is cost-effective, with a net benefit of CNY 3208.8/ha (USD 449.2/ha; 1 CNY = 0.14 USD), which is CNY 253.8/ha (USD 35.5/ha) higher than that of conventional film. The net benefit for biodegradable film application is lower than that for conventional film, at CNY 2244.6/ha (USD 314.2/ha). The results reveal the significant potential of promoting the use of thicker film due to its recycling and economic advantages. Findings imply that the further promotion of its use lies in improving farmers' cognition and optimizing subsidy dimensions to allocate government financial resources more effectively. On the contrary, biodegradable film utilization is unprofitable and relies on continuous external subsidies. The government can optimize the subsidy standard based on the cost-benefit performance of different mulch films applied and provide incentives to promote cost reductions and efficiency increases. Further analysis indicates that sustainable mulch film management entails developing mechanisms to internalize the external benefits of management and innovating a new governance landscape.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [11] Recycling, disposal, or biodegradable-alternative of polyethylene plastic film for agricultural mulching? A life cycle analysis of their environmental impacts
    Dong, Hantao
    Yang, Guang
    Zhang, Yamin
    Yang, Yanying
    Wang, Dawei
    Zhou, Chuanbin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 380
  • [12] Comparison of PFAS soil remediation alternatives at a civilian airport using cost-benefit analysis
    Drenning, P.
    Volchko, Y.
    Ahrens, L.
    Rosen, L.
    Soderqvist, T.
    Norrman, J.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 882
  • [13] FDRCSD (Fudan University Research Center of Sustainable Development), Fudan Carbon Price Index for August 2023
  • [14] Biodegradable film mulching reduces the climate cost of saving water without yield penalty in dryland rice production
    Gao, Haihe
    Liu, Qin
    Gong, Daozhi
    Liu, Hongjin
    Luo, Lijun
    Cui, Jixiao
    Qi, Haibin
    Ma, Fen
    He, Wenqing
    Mancl, Karen
    Yan, Changrong
    Mei, Xurong
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2023, 197
  • [15] Effects of plasticmulching and plastic residue on agricultural production: A meta-analysis
    Gao, Haihe
    Yan, Changrong
    Liu, Qin
    Ding, Weili
    Chen, Baoqing
    Li, Zhen
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 651 : 484 - 492
  • [16] GSDRC (Gansu Provincial Development and Reform Commission), Notice of Gansu Provincial Development and Reform Commission on Adjustment of Feed-in Tariffs of Power Generating Enterprises and Related Issues
  • [17] Stochastic cost-benefit analysis of urban waste-to-energy systems
    Haraguchi, Masahiko
    Siddiqi, Afreen
    Narayanamurti, Venkatesh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 224 : 751 - 765
  • [18] On the psychology of poverty
    Haushofer, Johannes
    Fehr, Ernst
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2014, 344 (6186) : 862 - 867
  • [19] Cost-benefit analysis for recycling of agricultural wastes in Taiwan
    Hsu, Esher
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2021, 120 : 424 - 432
  • [20] ICMOA (Information Center of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People's Republic of China), Information of Agricultural Products Wholesale Market Price