Cost-Benefit Analysis of Mulch Film Management and Its Policy Implications in Northern China

被引:2
作者
Hao, Aibo [1 ,2 ]
Yin, Changbin [1 ,3 ]
Leonard, Angelique [4 ]
Dogot, Thomas [2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Agr Resources & Reg Planning, State Key Lab Efficient Utilizat Arid & Semiarid A, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Liege, TERRA Teaching & Res Ctr, Econ & Rural Dev Lab, Gembloux Agrobio Tech, B-5030 Gembloux, Belgium
[3] Res Ctr Agr Green Dev China, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Liege, Dept Appl Chem, Lab Chem Engn, B-4000 Liege, Belgium
来源
AGRICULTURE-BASEL | 2024年 / 14卷 / 07期
关键词
mulch film management; cost-benefit analysis; thicker mulch film; biodegradable mulch film; policy implication; AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION; PLASTIC FILM; WASTE;
D O I
10.3390/agriculture14071081
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Agricultural white pollution is a pressing concern in China. However, the efficiency and rationality of the government's subsidies for mulch film management remain ambiguous. To formulate reasonable policies for mulch film management and optimize fiscal resource allocation, the study employs cost-benefit analysis to evaluate the economic performance of mulch film management. Two environmentally friendly measures being primarily proposed in China, namely the application of thicker mulch film (hereinafter referred to as thicker film) and the substitution of biodegradable mulch film (hereinafter referred to as biodegradable film), are selected for analysis, with conventional mulch film (hereinafter referred to as conventional film) serving as the benchmark for comparison. Primary data obtained through field surveys, supplemented by secondary data from national statistics, industry reports, and literature reviews, are used for the study. Results show that thicker film application is cost-effective, with a net benefit of CNY 3208.8/ha (USD 449.2/ha; 1 CNY = 0.14 USD), which is CNY 253.8/ha (USD 35.5/ha) higher than that of conventional film. The net benefit for biodegradable film application is lower than that for conventional film, at CNY 2244.6/ha (USD 314.2/ha). The results reveal the significant potential of promoting the use of thicker film due to its recycling and economic advantages. Findings imply that the further promotion of its use lies in improving farmers' cognition and optimizing subsidy dimensions to allocate government financial resources more effectively. On the contrary, biodegradable film utilization is unprofitable and relies on continuous external subsidies. The government can optimize the subsidy standard based on the cost-benefit performance of different mulch films applied and provide incentives to promote cost reductions and efficiency increases. Further analysis indicates that sustainable mulch film management entails developing mechanisms to internalize the external benefits of management and innovating a new governance landscape.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2017, Polythylene Blown Mulch Film for Agricultural Uses
  • [2] BIPT (Beijing Institute of Petrochemical Technology), 2020, Plastics Environmental Footprint in China
  • [3] Brent R.J., 2006, Applied cost-benefit analysis, V3rd
  • [4] Pathways for enhancing sustainable mobility in emerging markets: Cost-benefit analysis and policy recommendations for recycling of electric-vehicle batteries in Thailand
    Chaianong, Aksornchan
    Pharino, Chanathip
    Langkau, Sabine
    Limthongkul, Pimpa
    Kunanusont, Nattanai
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2024, 47 : 1 - 16
  • [5] Costs and benefits of constructed wetlands for meeting new water quality standards from China's wastewater treatment plants
    Chen, Jialin
    Guo, Fei
    Wu, Fengchang
    Bryan, Brett A.
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2023, 199
  • [6] Biotechnology to sustainability: Consumer preferences for food products grown on biodegradable mulches
    Chen, Kuan-Ju
    Marsh, Thomas L.
    Tozer, Peter R.
    Galinato, Suzette P.
    [J]. FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 116 : 200 - 210
  • [7] cngold, Cngold Daily Diesel Price
  • [8] Cotton China, Overview of Seed Cotton Purchase Price
  • [9] Cui Y., 2024, J. Cold-Arid Agric. Sci, V3, P57, DOI [10.3969/j.issn.2097-2172.2024.01.010, DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.2097-2172.2024.01.010]
  • [10] Cost-benefit analysis of an infrastructure project and a cost-reflective tariff: A case study for investment in wastewater treatment plant in Serbia
    Djukic, Malisa
    Jovanoski, Iljcho
    Ivanovic, Olja Munitlak
    Lazic, Milena
    Bodroza, Dusko
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 59 : 1419 - 1425