Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

被引:1
|
作者
Yo, Jennifer H. [1 ,7 ,8 ,9 ]
Fields, Neville [2 ,8 ,9 ]
Li, Wentao [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Anderson, Alice [6 ]
Marshall, Sarah A. [3 ,8 ]
Kerr, Peter G. [1 ,7 ]
Palmer, Kirsten R. [2 ,3 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Monash Hlth, Dept Nephrol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Hlth, Monash Womens & Newborn, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ New South Wales, Fac Med, Ctr Big Data Res Hlth, Natl Perinatal Epidemiol & Stat Unit NPESU, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Univ New South Wales, Fac Med, Sch Clin Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] Monash Hlth, Lib Serv, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] Monash Univ, Sch Clin Sci, Dept Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[8] Monash Univ, Ritchie Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[9] Monash Univ, Hudson Inst Med Res, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
KIDNEY-TRANSPLANTATION; HEART-TRANSPLANTATION; LIVER; WOMEN; RISK; BIAS;
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.30913
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Importance Transplant recipients experience high rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes; however, contemporary estimates of the association between solid organ transplantation and adverse pregnancy outcomes are lacking. Objective To evaluate the association between solid organ transplantation and adverse pregnancy outcomes and to quantify the incidence of allograft rejection and allograft loss during pregnancy. Data Sources PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and Scopus databases were searched from January 1, 2000, to June 20, 2024, and reference lists were manually reviewed. Study Selection Cohort and case-control studies that reported at least 1 adverse pregnancy outcome in pregnant women with solid organ transplantation vs without solid organ transplant or studies that reported allograft outcomes in pregnant women with solid organ transplantation were included following independent dual review of abstracts and full-text articles. Data Extraction and Synthesis Two investigators abstracted data and independently appraised risk of bias using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. A random-effects model was used to calculate overall pooled estimates using the DerSimonian-Laird estimator. Reporting followed the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) reporting guideline. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary pregnancy outcomes were preeclampsia, preterm birth (<37 weeks), and low birth weight (<2500 g). Secondary pregnancy outcomes were live birth rate, gestation, very preterm birth (<32 weeks), very low birth weight (<1500 g), and cesarean delivery. Allograft outcomes were allograft loss and rejection during pregnancy. Results Data from 22 studies and 93 565 343 pregnancies (4786 pregnancies in solid organ transplant recipients) were included; 14 studies reported adverse pregnancy outcomes, and 13 studies provided data for allograft outcomes. Pregnancies in organ transplant recipients were associated with significantly increased risk of preeclampsia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.83 [95% CI, 3.45-9.87]; I-2 = 77.4%), preterm birth (aOR, 6.65 [95% CI, 4.09-12.83]; I-2 = 81.8%), and low birth weight (aOR, 6.51 [95% CI, 2.85-14.88]; I-2 = 90.6%). The incidence of acute allograft rejection was 2.39% (95% CI, 1.20%-3.96%; I-2 = 68.5%), and the incidence of allograft loss during pregnancy was 1.55% (95% CI, 0.05%-4.44%; I-2 = 69.2%). Conclusions and Relevance In this systematic review and meta-analysis, pregnancies in recipients of a solid organ transplant were associated with a 4 to 6 times increased risk of preeclampsia, preterm birth, and low birth weight during pregnancy. There was a low overall risk of graft rejection or loss during pregnancy.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Dosing algorithms for initiation of immunosuppressive drugs in solid organ transplant recipients
    Andrews, Louise M.
    Riva, Natalia
    de Winter, Brenda C.
    Hesselink, Dennis A.
    de Wildt, Saskia N.
    Cransberg, Karlien
    van Gelder, Teun
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG METABOLISM & TOXICOLOGY, 2015, 11 (06) : 921 - 936
  • [32] Pharmacologic Considerations for Solid Organ Transplant Recipients Who Become Pregnant
    Casale, Jillian P.
    Doligalski, Christina T.
    PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2016, 36 (09): : 971 - 982
  • [33] Elevated incidence of head and neck cancer in solid organ transplant recipients
    Mowery, Alia J.
    Conlin, Michael J.
    Clayburgh, Daniel R.
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2019, 41 (11): : 4009 - 4017
  • [34] Skin cancer in solid organ transplant recipients: still an open problem
    Granata, Simona
    Tessari, Gianpaolo
    Stallone, Giovanni
    Zaza, Gianluigi
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 10
  • [35] The Prevalence and Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction in Male Solid Organ Transplant Recipients
    Payne, Kelly
    Popat, Shreeya
    Lipshultz, Larry, I
    Thirumavalavan, Nannan
    SEXUAL MEDICINE REVIEWS, 2021, 9 (02) : 331 - 339
  • [36] Mortality among solid organ transplant recipients with a pretransplant cancer diagnosis
    Hart, Allyson
    Pfeiffer, Ruth M.
    Morawski, Bozena M.
    Lynch, Charles F.
    Zeng, Yun
    Pawlish, Karen
    Hurley, Deborah
    Yu, Kelly J.
    Engels, Eric A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 23 (02) : 257 - 264
  • [37] Cancer in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: There Is Still Much to Learn and Do
    Engels, E. A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 17 (08) : 1967 - 1969
  • [38] Management of Viral Hepatitis in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients
    Buganza-Torio, Elizabeth
    Doucette, Karen Elizabeth
    INFECTIOUS DISEASE CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2018, 32 (03) : 635 - +
  • [39] Urinary Tract Infections in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients
    Rice, J. C.
    Safdar, N.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 9 : S267 - S272
  • [40] Individualized management of cytomegalovirus in solid organ transplant recipients
    Saeed, Huma
    Thoendel, Matthew
    Razonable, Raymund R.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PRECISION MEDICINE AND DRUG DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 6 (05): : 333 - 344