Risk Factors and Treatment of Chylothorax After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Tsuchitani, Yuma [1 ]
Ozawa, Yohei [1 ]
Taniyama, Yusuke [1 ]
Okamoto, Hiroshi [2 ]
Sato, Chiaki [1 ]
Ishida, Hirotaka [1 ]
Kamei, Takashi [1 ]
机构
[1] Tohoku Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Surg, Sendai, Japan
[2] Tohoku Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Sendai, Japan
关键词
postoperative complicaiton; chylothorax; minimally invasive esophagectomy (mie); esophagectomy; esophageal neoplasms; THORACIC-DUCT; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.65606
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Postoperative chylothorax is a rare but life-threatening complication of esophagectomy. However, due to its rarity, researching the risk factors and selecting appropriate treatment options has been limited. Methods This study included 727 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy at our hospital. To detect the risk factors for chylothorax, we divided the patients into two groups, with and without postoperative chylothorax. We then compared patient characteristics, tumor-specific variables, and operative details. Subsequently, we analyzed the peri-treatment characteristics and outcomes for the three distinct treatment options we had chosen: surgery, conversion (the group that finally underwent surgery after unsuccessful conservative treatment), and conservative. Results Of the 727 patients, 18 (2.5%) developed a chylothorax. The mean BMI was lower (20.3 vs. 21.9, p=0.057), and more cases of thoracic duct resection were found in the chylothorax group (33.3% vs. 6.2%, p=0.001), with statistical significance. Multivariate analysis identified thoracic duct resection as a risk factor (adjusted odds ratio, 6.83). The drainage volume two days after chylothorax was higher in the surgery group, although the difference was not statistically significant (surgery group, 1,405 ml vs. conversion group, 260 ml vs. conservative group, 310 ml; p=0.073). The surgery group had the shortest median postoperative hospital days among these groups (21.5 as compared to 102 and 25.0 days in the conversion and conservative groups, respectively; p<0.001). None of the patients died during their hospital stays. Conclusion Thoracic duct resection during the initial minimally invasive esophagectomy was an independent risk factor for chylothorax. If drainage volume does not decrease on the second day, early surgery may lead to earlier discharge.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of perioperative outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer
    Mao, Teng
    Fang, Wentao
    Gu, Zhitao
    Guo, Xufeng
    Ji, Chunyu
    Chen, Wenhu
    THORACIC CANCER, 2015, 6 (03) : 303 - 306
  • [42] Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in the People's Republic of China: an overview
    Zhu, Chengchu
    Jin, Ketao
    ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2013, 6 : 119 - 124
  • [43] Risk factors for the development of postoperative atrial fibrillation after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer
    He, Feng
    Wu, Xi
    Yang, Ziheng
    Tu, Dehao
    Li, Fan
    Deng, Yu
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (38) : E35183
  • [44] Oncologic outcomes in minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma
    Devaud, Nicolas A.
    Yeung, Jonathan C.
    Darling, Gail E.
    VIDEO-ASSISTED THORACIC SURGERY, 2021, 6
  • [45] Comparisons of minimally invasive esophagectomy and open esophagectomy in lymph node metastasis/dissection for thoracic esophageal cancer
    Li, Zhenhua
    Gai, Chunyue
    Zhang, Yuefeng
    Wen, Shiwang
    Lv, Huilai
    Xu, Yanzhao
    Huang, Chao
    Zhao, Bo
    Tian, Ziqiang
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 135 (20) : 2446 - 2452
  • [46] Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in elderly patients
    Li, Yong
    Wang, Pei
    Li, Xiaohui
    Shi, Gongning
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2016, 9 (07): : 13007 - 13013
  • [47] Comparisons of minimally invasive esophagectomy and open esophagectomy in lymph node metastasis/dissection for thoracic esophageal cancer
    Li Zhenhua
    Gai Chunyue
    Zhang Yuefeng
    Wen Shiwang
    Lv Huilai
    Xu Yanzhao
    Huang Chao
    Zhao Bo
    Tian Ziqiang
    中华医学杂志英文版, 2022, 135 (20)
  • [48] Management of Chylothorax in Esophageal Surgery by Minimally Invasive Thoracoscopic Approach: Case Series
    Gheorghe, Mircea
    Achim, Florin
    Hoara, Petre
    Constantin, Adrian
    Constantinoiu, Silviu
    CHIRURGIA, 2022, 117 (02) : 230 - 236
  • [49] Is minimally invasive esophagectomy indicated for cancer?
    Qureshi, Irfan
    Nason, Katie S.
    Luketich, James D.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2008, 8 (09) : 1449 - 1460
  • [50] Recurrence and Survival After Minimally Invasive and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer A Post Hoc Analysis of the Ensure Study
    Henckens, Sofie P. G.
    Schuring, Nannet
    Elliott, Jessie A.
    Johar, Asif
    Markar, Sheraz R.
    Gantxegi, Amaia
    Lagergren, Pernilla
    Hanna, George B.
    Pera, Manuel
    Reynolds, John V.
    van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I.
    Gisbertz, Suzanne S.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2024, 280 (02) : 267 - 273