Risk Factors and Treatment of Chylothorax After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Tsuchitani, Yuma [1 ]
Ozawa, Yohei [1 ]
Taniyama, Yusuke [1 ]
Okamoto, Hiroshi [2 ]
Sato, Chiaki [1 ]
Ishida, Hirotaka [1 ]
Kamei, Takashi [1 ]
机构
[1] Tohoku Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Surg, Sendai, Japan
[2] Tohoku Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Sendai, Japan
关键词
postoperative complicaiton; chylothorax; minimally invasive esophagectomy (mie); esophagectomy; esophageal neoplasms; THORACIC-DUCT; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.65606
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Postoperative chylothorax is a rare but life-threatening complication of esophagectomy. However, due to its rarity, researching the risk factors and selecting appropriate treatment options has been limited. Methods This study included 727 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy at our hospital. To detect the risk factors for chylothorax, we divided the patients into two groups, with and without postoperative chylothorax. We then compared patient characteristics, tumor-specific variables, and operative details. Subsequently, we analyzed the peri-treatment characteristics and outcomes for the three distinct treatment options we had chosen: surgery, conversion (the group that finally underwent surgery after unsuccessful conservative treatment), and conservative. Results Of the 727 patients, 18 (2.5%) developed a chylothorax. The mean BMI was lower (20.3 vs. 21.9, p=0.057), and more cases of thoracic duct resection were found in the chylothorax group (33.3% vs. 6.2%, p=0.001), with statistical significance. Multivariate analysis identified thoracic duct resection as a risk factor (adjusted odds ratio, 6.83). The drainage volume two days after chylothorax was higher in the surgery group, although the difference was not statistically significant (surgery group, 1,405 ml vs. conversion group, 260 ml vs. conservative group, 310 ml; p=0.073). The surgery group had the shortest median postoperative hospital days among these groups (21.5 as compared to 102 and 25.0 days in the conversion and conservative groups, respectively; p<0.001). None of the patients died during their hospital stays. Conclusion Thoracic duct resection during the initial minimally invasive esophagectomy was an independent risk factor for chylothorax. If drainage volume does not decrease on the second day, early surgery may lead to earlier discharge.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Risk factor and treatments of chylothorax after esophageal cancer surgery
    Yamada, Moyuru
    Tanaka, Koji
    Yamasaki, Makoto
    Makino, Tomoki
    Miyazaki, Yasuhiro
    Takahashi, Tsuyoshi
    Kurokawa, Yukinori
    Mori, Masaki
    Doki, Yuichiro
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 33 : 99 - 99
  • [32] Safety and feasibility of minimally invasive esophagectomy for elderly esophageal cancer patients
    Sugita, Y.
    Nakamura, T.
    Sawada, R.
    Takiguchi, G.
    Urakawa, N.
    Hasegawa, H.
    Yamamoto, M.
    Kanaji, S.
    Matsuda, Y.
    Yamashita, K.
    Matsuda, T.
    Oshikiri, T.
    Suzuki, S.
    Kakeji, Y.
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2021, 34 (03)
  • [33] Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization for esophageal cancer with the patient in prone position
    Petri, Roberto
    Zuccolo, Marco
    Brizzolari, Marco
    Rossit, Luca
    Rosignoli, Alessandro
    Durastante, Vittorio
    Petrin, Gianfranco
    De Cecchis, Lucio
    Sorrentino, Mario
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (04): : 1102 - 1107
  • [34] Atypical presentation and transabdominal treatment of chylothorax complicating esophagectomy for cancer
    Rottoli, Matteo
    Russo, Iris S.
    Bernardi, Daniele
    Bonavina, Luigi
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2012, 7
  • [35] Risk Factors for Postoperative Anastomosis Leak After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer
    Aoyama, Toru
    Atsumi, Yosuke
    Hara, Kentaro
    Tamagawa, Hiroshi
    Tamagawa, Ayako
    Komori, Keisuke
    Hashimoto, Itaru
    Maezawa, Yukio
    Kazama, Keisuke
    Kano, Kazuki
    Murakawa, Masaaki
    Numata, Masakatsu
    Oshima, Takashi
    Yukawa, Norio
    Masuda, Munetaka
    Rino, Yasushi
    IN VIVO, 2020, 34 (02): : 857 - 862
  • [36] Influence of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Short-term Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer
    Nomoto, Daichi
    Yoshida, Naoya
    Akiyama, Takahiko
    Kiyozumi, Yuki
    Eto, Kojiro
    Hiyoshi, Yukiharu
    Nagai, Yohei
    Iwatsuki, Masaaki
    Iwagami, Shiro
    Baba, Yoshifumi
    Miyamoto, Yuji
    Baba, Hideo
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 39 (01) : 471 - 475
  • [37] Retrospective Comparison of Two Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in the Treatment of Esophageal Cancer: Pneumatic Mediastinoscopy Versus Thoracoscopy
    Jin, Yuxiang
    Lu, Xinye
    Xue, Lei
    Zhao, Xuewei
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 29 (05): : 638 - 642
  • [38] Hybrid Minimally-invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Clinical and Oncological Outcomes
    Davakis, Spyridon
    Syllaios, Athanasios
    Sdralis, Elias
    Lorenzi, Bruno
    Charalabopoulos, Alexandros
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 40 (03) : 1753 - 1758
  • [39] Anastomosis after Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy
    Knickerbocker, Chase
    Andreoni, Anthony
    Nieber, Derek
    Nwafor, Deborah
    Ben-David, Kfir
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 29 (04): : 513 - 518
  • [40] Identification of Risk Factors Associated With Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer
    Konda, Prameela
    Ai, Di
    Guerra, Carlos E.
    Rodriguez-Restrepo, Andrea
    Mehran, Reza J.
    Rice, David
    Hofstetter, Wayne
    Heir, Jagtar
    Kwater, Peter
    Gottumukkala, Vijaya
    Hernandez, Mike
    Cata, Juan P.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2017, 31 (02) : 474 - 481