Network portfolio diversity and social innovation: An egocentric approach to cross-sector partnerships

被引:0
作者
Fu, Jiawei Sophia [1 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Sch Commun & Informat, Dept Commun, 4 Huntington St, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
关键词
Interorganizational network portfolio; Ego network; Cross-sector partnerships; Interorganizational relationships; Social innovation; Social ventures; Nonprofit organization; Organizational Innovation; INTERORGANIZATIONAL NETWORK; VALUE CREATION; STRUCTURAL HOLES; TASK CONFLICT; WEAK TIES; COLLABORATION; ORGANIZATION; KNOWLEDGE; IDEAS; GOVERNANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.socnet.2024.03.002
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
The culmination of network and organization research suggests diverse network ties bolster innovation. Extending this line of research, this study examines how three distinct dimensions of network portfolio diversity-duration, tie strength, and collaboration type-are related to organizational innovation. Survey, ego network, and expert evaluation data on 258 U.S. social ventures suggest that these different dimensions have differential impact on the novelty of ideas organizations develop to tackle social issues (i.e., social innovation). Specifically, while diversity in relationship duration with nonprofit partners had an inverted U-shaped curvilinear relationship with social innovation, diversity in collaboration type with business partners and diversity in tie strength with government partners each had a U-shaped curvilinear relationship. These results highlight that the relationship between network diversity and organizational innovation is contingent on the network portfolio dimension, as well as the partner sector. This research contributes to theorizing on social and interorganizational networks, cross-sector partnerships, and social innovation. Findings also have implications for organizational leaders as they configure heterogeneous ego network portfolios to boost innovation for social impact.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 252
页数:15
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]   Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study [J].
Ahuja, G .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2000, 45 (03) :425-455
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital
[3]   Collaborative Value Creation: A Review of Partnering Between Nonprofits and Businesses: Part I. Value Creation Spectrum and Collaboration Stages [J].
Austin, James E. ;
Seitanidi, M. May .
NONPROFIT AND VOLUNTARY SECTOR QUARTERLY, 2012, 41 (05) :726-758
[4]  
Austin JamesE., 2000, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, V29, P69, DOI [DOI 10.1177/0899764000291S004, DOI 10.1177/089976400773746346]
[5]   Social Entrepreneurship and COVID-19 [J].
Bacq, Sophie ;
Lumpkin, G. T. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2021, 58 (01) :283-286
[6]   Tenure trumps title: Assessing the Logic of informant selection in inter-organizational network research [J].
Beacom, Amanda M. ;
Valente, Thomas .
NETWORK SCIENCE, 2019, 7 (03) :402-421
[7]   Defining Our Own Future: Human Service Leaders on Social Innovation [J].
Berzin, Stephanie Cosner ;
Pitt-Catsouphes, Marcie ;
Gaitan-Rossi, Pablo .
HUMAN SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS MANAGEMENT LEADERSHIP & GOVERNANCE, 2015, 39 (05) :412-425
[8]  
Blau P.M., 1977, Inequality and heterogeneity: a primitive theory of social structure
[9]   Resilience and fragmentation in healthcare coalitions: The link between resource contributions and centrality in health-related interorganizational networks [J].
Bohnett, Eve ;
Vacca, Raffaele ;
Hu, Yujie ;
Hulse, David ;
Varda, Danielle .
SOCIAL NETWORKS, 2022, 71 :87-95
[10]   PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS: PERSPECTIVES ON PURPOSES, PUBLICNESS, AND GOOD GOVERNANCE [J].
Brinkerhoff, Derick W. ;
Brinkerhoff, Jennifer M. .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 31 (01) :2-14