Subanesthetic Dose of Esketamine Improves the Sedative and Analgesic Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil in Liposuction Anesthesia: A Prospective, Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:0
|
作者
Chen, Haotian [1 ]
Zhi, Juan [1 ]
Wang, Lei [1 ]
Jin, Zibin [1 ]
Xu, Jin [1 ]
Xing, Fei [1 ]
Wen, Chao [1 ]
Wang, Qianyu [1 ]
Chen, Chunmei [1 ]
Li, Weiou [1 ]
Xu, Ermeng [1 ]
An, Jie [1 ]
Wei, Lingxin [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Plast Surg Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, 33 Badachu Rd, Beijing 100144, Peoples R China
来源
DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY | 2024年 / 18卷
关键词
esketamine; sedation; analgesia; satisfaction; liposuction; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; PLASTIC-SURGERY; KETAMINE; EFFICACY; SAFETY; DEPRESSION; PROPOFOL;
D O I
10.2147/DDDT.S470891
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Purpose: Esketamine have anesthetic and analgesic properties. This study aimed to observe the enhancing effect of subanesthetic doses of esketamine (0.15-0.3 mg/kg/h) with dexmedetomidine and remifentanil during anesthesia for liposuction surgery. Patients and methods: A total of 155 subjects were randomized with a 1:1 ratio to Group E (esketamine-dexmedetomidine/remifentanil, n=78) or Group C (saline-dexmedetomidine/remifentanil group, n=77). The primary outcome was satisfaction of patient and surgical team with the procedure. The secondary outcomes were the postoperative Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores, hemodynamic and respiratory changes, drug consumption, adverse event rates, and predictors associated with patient satisfaction. Results: Patient and surgical team satisfaction with the procedure was significantly higher in Group E than in Group C (4.7 +/- 0.6 vs 4.2 +/- 0.7, P < 0.001; 4.7 +/- 0.5 vs 4.4 +/- 0.7, P = 0.005). The postoperative AIS (4 [1, 6] vs 5 [2, 9], P = 0.012) and HADS-A (1 [0, 3] vs 2 [0, 6], P = 0.012) scores were significantly lower in Group E than in Group C. Hemodynamic and respiratory parameters were more stable in Group E than in Group C, with the lower opioids consumption of sufentanil (0 [0, 4] vs 5 [2.5, 7.7], P < 0.001) and remifentanil (700 [480, 900] vs 800 [500, 1200], P = 0.023) in Group E compared to Group C. On ordinal logistics regression, postoperative sleep quality (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.62-0.79), anxiety level (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.95) and recovery time in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56-0.98) were identified as significant predictors associated with patient satisfaction. Conclusion: A subanesthetic dose of esketamine (0.15-0.3 mg/kg/h) as an adjuvant can improves the sedative and analgesic effects of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil during anesthesia for liposuction surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:3645 / 3658
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of midazolam and low-dose dexmedetomidine in flexible bronchoscopy: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded study
    Magazine, Rahul
    Venkatachala, Shivaraj
    Goneppanavar, Umesh
    Surendra, Vyshak Uddur
    Guddattu, Vasudeva
    Chogtu, Bharti
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 52 (01) : 23 - 30
  • [32] Effect of pre-administration of esketamine intraoperatively on postpartum depression after cesarean section: A randomized, double-blinded controlled trial
    Wang, Wei
    Ling, Bin
    Chen, Qian
    Xu, Hua
    Lv, Jie
    Yu, Wanyou
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (09) : E33086
  • [33] Efficacy and safety of subanesthetic doses of esketamine combined with propofol in painless gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial
    Yongtong Zhan
    Shuqing Liang
    Zecheng Yang
    Qichen Luo
    Shuai Li
    Jiamin Li
    Zhaojia Liang
    Yalan Li
    BMC Gastroenterology, 22
  • [34] Tramadol-metoclopramide or remifentanil for patient-controlled analgesia during second trimester abortion: a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial
    Orbach-Zinger, Sharon
    Paul-Keslin, Lesley
    Nichinson, Ella
    Chinchuck, Andrei
    Nitke, Shmuel
    Eidelman, Leonid A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2012, 24 (01) : 28 - 32
  • [35] Topical Anesthesia or Oral Dextrose for the Relief of Pain in Screening for Retinopathy of Prematurity: a Randomized Controlled Double-blinded Trial
    Nesargi, Saudamini V.
    Nithyanandam, Suneetha
    Rao, Suman
    Nimbalkar, Somashekhar
    Bhat, Swarnarekha
    JOURNAL OF TROPICAL PEDIATRICS, 2015, 61 (01) : 20 - 24
  • [36] The Prophylactic Use of Remifentanil for Delayed Extubation After Elective Intracranial Operations: a Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded Trial
    Wu, Yuan-Xing
    Chen, Han
    Li, Qian
    Hao, Jing-Jing
    Zhao, Li-Hong
    He, Xuan
    Sun, Xiu-Mei
    Xu, Ming
    Zhou, Jian-Xin
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2017, 29 (03) : 281 - 290
  • [37] Comparison of the efficacy of two doses of dexmedetomidine as an adjunct to levobupivacaine in infraclavicular brachial plexus block: prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Huda F. Ghazaly
    Ahmed Alsaied A. Aly
    Zaher Zaki Zaher
    Mahmoud M. Hassan
    Ahmed Abdelreheem Mahmoud
    BMC Anesthesiology, 22
  • [38] Opioid-free total intravenous anesthesia with propofol, dexmedetomidine and lidocaine infusions for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study
    Bakan, Mefkur
    Umutoglu, Tarik
    Topuz, Ufuk
    Uysal, Harun
    Bayram, Mehmet
    Kadioglu, Huseyin
    Salihoglu, Ziya
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, 2015, 65 (03): : 191 - 199
  • [39] Intranasal Dexmedetomidine for Pain Management in Older Patients: A Cross-Over, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Active-Controlled Trial
    Rahm, Nathalie Dieudonne
    Zaccaria, Isabelle
    Wey, Beatrice Gil
    Pautex, Sophie
    Habre, Walid
    Elia, Nadia
    DRUGS & AGING, 2023, 40 (06) : 527 - 538
  • [40] Comparing the Suppressing Effect of Dexmedetomidine versus Lidocaine in Cough during Anesthesia Emergence: A Double-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial
    Saidie, Sohaila
    Modir, Hesameddin
    Yazdi, Bijan
    Moshiri, Esmail
    Mohammadbeigi, Abolfazi
    JOURNAL OF HEAD & NECK PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS, 2019, 7 (02): : 62 - 66