Subanesthetic Dose of Esketamine Improves the Sedative and Analgesic Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil in Liposuction Anesthesia: A Prospective, Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:0
|
作者
Chen, Haotian [1 ]
Zhi, Juan [1 ]
Wang, Lei [1 ]
Jin, Zibin [1 ]
Xu, Jin [1 ]
Xing, Fei [1 ]
Wen, Chao [1 ]
Wang, Qianyu [1 ]
Chen, Chunmei [1 ]
Li, Weiou [1 ]
Xu, Ermeng [1 ]
An, Jie [1 ]
Wei, Lingxin [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Plast Surg Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, 33 Badachu Rd, Beijing 100144, Peoples R China
来源
DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY | 2024年 / 18卷
关键词
esketamine; sedation; analgesia; satisfaction; liposuction; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; PLASTIC-SURGERY; KETAMINE; EFFICACY; SAFETY; DEPRESSION; PROPOFOL;
D O I
10.2147/DDDT.S470891
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Purpose: Esketamine have anesthetic and analgesic properties. This study aimed to observe the enhancing effect of subanesthetic doses of esketamine (0.15-0.3 mg/kg/h) with dexmedetomidine and remifentanil during anesthesia for liposuction surgery. Patients and methods: A total of 155 subjects were randomized with a 1:1 ratio to Group E (esketamine-dexmedetomidine/remifentanil, n=78) or Group C (saline-dexmedetomidine/remifentanil group, n=77). The primary outcome was satisfaction of patient and surgical team with the procedure. The secondary outcomes were the postoperative Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores, hemodynamic and respiratory changes, drug consumption, adverse event rates, and predictors associated with patient satisfaction. Results: Patient and surgical team satisfaction with the procedure was significantly higher in Group E than in Group C (4.7 +/- 0.6 vs 4.2 +/- 0.7, P < 0.001; 4.7 +/- 0.5 vs 4.4 +/- 0.7, P = 0.005). The postoperative AIS (4 [1, 6] vs 5 [2, 9], P = 0.012) and HADS-A (1 [0, 3] vs 2 [0, 6], P = 0.012) scores were significantly lower in Group E than in Group C. Hemodynamic and respiratory parameters were more stable in Group E than in Group C, with the lower opioids consumption of sufentanil (0 [0, 4] vs 5 [2.5, 7.7], P < 0.001) and remifentanil (700 [480, 900] vs 800 [500, 1200], P = 0.023) in Group E compared to Group C. On ordinal logistics regression, postoperative sleep quality (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.62-0.79), anxiety level (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.95) and recovery time in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56-0.98) were identified as significant predictors associated with patient satisfaction. Conclusion: A subanesthetic dose of esketamine (0.15-0.3 mg/kg/h) as an adjuvant can improves the sedative and analgesic effects of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil during anesthesia for liposuction surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:3645 / 3658
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of the Sedative and Analgesic Effects of Dexmedetomidine-Remifentanil and Dexmedetomidine-Sufentanil for Liposuction: A Prospective Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Study
    Wang, Ye
    Xu, Wenli
    Xia, Weipeng
    Wei, Lingxin
    Yang, Dong
    Deng, Xiaoming
    Yan, Fuxia
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2022, 46 (01) : 524 - 534
  • [2] Comparison of the Sedative and Analgesic Effects of Dexmedetomidine–Remifentanil and Dexmedetomidine–Sufentanil for Liposuction: A Prospective Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Study
    Ye Wang
    Wenli Xu
    Weipeng Xia
    Lingxin Wei
    Dong Yang
    Xiaoming Deng
    Fuxia Yan
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2022, 46 : 524 - 534
  • [3] The effect of a subclinical dose of esketamine on depression and pain after cesarean section: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded controlled trial
    Wan, Xiangqian
    Li, Ming
    Li, Xiantao
    Dai, Huan
    Peng, Mingqing
    MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (44) : e40295
  • [4] Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil sedation during awake fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Hu, Rong
    Liu, J. X.
    Jiang, Hong
    JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2013, 27 (02) : 211 - 217
  • [5] Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil for sedation during awake intubation using a Shikani optical stylet: a randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial
    Xu, Ting
    Li, Min
    Ni, Cheng
    Guo, Xiang-yang
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2016, 16
  • [6] Evaluating efficacy and safety of sub-anesthetic dose esketamine as an adjuvant to propofol/remifentanil analgosedation and spontaneous respiration for children flexible fibreoptic bronchoscopy: a prospective, double-blinded, randomized, and placebo-controlled clinical trial
    Zhong, Yu
    Jiang, Min
    Wang, Yunshi
    Su, Tingting
    Lv, Yuanzhi
    Fan, Zhiqing
    Ning, Hengyi
    Yang, Yilan
    Chen, Yanhua
    Xie, Yubo
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [7] Postoperative esketamine improves ventilation after video-assisted thoracoscopic lung resection: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Fu, Mengyue
    Xu, Rui
    Chen, Guizhen
    Zheng, Xuemei
    Shu, Bin
    Huang, He
    Duan, Guangyou
    Chen, Yuanjing
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (03)
  • [8] Efficacy and Safety of a Subanesthetic Dose of Esketamine Combined with Propofol in Patients with Obesity Undergoing Painless Gastroscopy: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
    Zheng, Longbin
    Wang, Yiteng
    Ma, Qing
    Liang, Wenbo
    Zhang, Xiaojing
    Ren, Zhiqiang
    Qin, Weimin
    Meng, Fan
    Li, Yuhong
    Fan, Guoxiang
    Yin, Ning
    DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2023, 17 : 1347 - 1356
  • [9] Effects of esketamine on analgesia and postpartum depression after cesarean section: A randomized, double-blinded controlled trial
    Wang, Wei
    Xu, Hua
    Ling, Bin
    Chen, Qing
    Lv, Jie
    Yu, Wanyou
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (47) : E32010
  • [10] Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil sedation during awake fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Rong Hu
    J. X. Liu
    Hong Jiang
    Journal of Anesthesia, 2013, 27 : 211 - 217