Fraternizing with the enemy: Intragroup effects of extended contact

被引:2
作者
Koetke, Jonah [1 ]
Schumann, Karina [1 ]
Levine, John M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
extended contact; intergroup relations; intragroup processes; political hostility; political orientation; INTERGROUP CONTACT; MEDIATION;
D O I
10.1177/13684302241271016
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Extended contact (i.e., knowledge that an ingroup member has a close relationship with an outgroup member) often improves relations between groups. In the current research, we argue that such contact can also undermine relations within groups. Specifically, we propose a "fraternizing with the enemy" effect in which the fraternizer is viewed negatively by other ingroup members. In five preregistered experiments (N = 2,035), we tested this effect in the context of political conflict using both real-world (Study 1) and fictitious (Studies 2-5) ingroup and outgroup members. Our results indicated that the fraternizer (vs. nonfraternizer) was viewed as less ideologically aligned with the ingroup, which in turn led to perceptions of this person as ambiguous and disloyal to the ingroup, and thereby elicited negative attitudes toward the fraternizer. We also found that, besides producing these negative effects, fraternizing with the enemy also produced the positive intergroup effects typically elicited by extended contact. We discuss the potential implications of our results for the effectiveness of extended contact in bridging political divides.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 425
页数:33
相关论文
共 55 条
[31]   Factional conflict in groups: How majorities and minorities relate to one another [J].
Levine, John M. .
GROUP PROCESSES & INTERGROUP RELATIONS, 2017, 20 (05) :644-657
[32]   GROUP REACTION TO DEFECTION: THE IMPACT OF SHARED REALITY [J].
Mannetti, Lucia ;
Levine, John M. ;
Pierro, Antonio ;
Kruglanski, Arie W. .
SOCIAL COGNITION, 2010, 28 (03) :447-464
[33]  
Marques J.M., 2001, SOCIAL CATEGORIZATIO, P400, DOI [10.1002/9780470998458.ch17, DOI 10.1002/9780470998458.CH17]
[34]  
Marques J.M., 1994, EUR REV SOC PSYCHOL, V5, P37, DOI [10.1080/14792779543000011, DOI 10.1080/14792779543000011]
[35]  
Marques J. M., 2023, OXFORD RES ENCY PSYC, DOI [10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.261, DOI 10.1093/ACREFORE/9780190236557.013.261]
[36]   How ideological migration geographically segregates groups [J].
Motyl, Matt ;
Iyer, Ravi ;
Oishi, Shigehiro ;
Trawalter, Sophie ;
Nosek, Brian A. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 51 :1-14
[37]   Cross-cutting social networks: Testing democratic theory in practice [J].
Mutz, DC .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2002, 96 (01) :111-126
[38]   Is Negative Attention Better Than No Attention? The Comparative Effects of Ostracism and Harassment at Work [J].
O'Reilly, Jane ;
Robinson, Sandra L. ;
Berdahl, Jennifer L. ;
Banki, Sara .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2015, 26 (03) :774-793
[39]   Prejudice Reduction: Progress and Challenges [J].
Paluck, Elizabeth Levy ;
Porat, Roni ;
Clark, Chelsey S. ;
Green, Donald P. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 72, 2021, 72 :533-560
[40]   Intergroup contact theory [J].
Pettigrew, TF .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 49 :65-85