Prediction of the Influence of the Inlet End-Wall Boundary Layer on the Secondary Flow of a Low Pressure Turbine Airfoil Using RANS and Large-Eddy Simulations

被引:1
作者
Gisbert, Fernando [1 ]
Cadrecha, David [1 ]
Apoita, Patxi [1 ]
机构
[1] ITP Aero, Alcobendas 28108, Madrid, Spain
来源
JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME | 2024年 / 146卷 / 09期
关键词
large-eddy simulation; boundary layer; low pressure turbine; secondary flow; Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes; boundary layer development; computational fluid dynamics (CFD); fluid dynamics and heat transfer phenomena in compressor and turbine components of gas turbine engines;
D O I
10.1115/1.4065026
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
This paper analyzes the effect of the inlet end-wall boundary layer on the secondary flow of a low pressure turbine airfoil cascade at Reynolds number 2 x 105 using RANS and implicit large-eddy simulations (LES). The results are compared against experimental data obtained at two low-speed linear cascade facilities, one located at the Whittle Laboratory of the University of Cambridge and the other at the Polytechnic University of Madrid. The RANS turbulence model is the k - omega - gamma - Re-theta t and no sub-grid scale model has been used in the LES. An unstructured mesh of hexahedra and prisms is used, with high order elements used in the boundary layer region to better describe the airfoil shape in the LES. Two inlet end-wall boundary layers that produce different secondary flow patterns are analyzed: a laminar thin velocity profile and a turbulent thick velocity profile with several inlet turbulent intensities. The agreement between LES numerical predictions and experimental measurements of the position and intensity of the secondary vortices is very good for both cases. RANS simulations are much cheaper in terms of computational cost and reasonably predict most of the flow features, except when the inlet turbulence is low and turbulent transition prediction becomes critical. The effect of the inlet velocity profiles and inlet turbulence on the secondary flow structure is quite pronounced. The velocity profile thickness determines the spanwise penetration of the passage vortex, and different inlet turbulence intensities modify its mixing. Higher inlet turbulence intensities lead to a decrease of the secondary losses due to the passage vortex and an increase of end-wall losses.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
[11]   NONREFLECTING BOUNDARY-CONDITIONS FOR EULER EQUATION CALCULATIONS [J].
GILES, MB .
AIAA JOURNAL, 1990, 28 (12) :2050-2058
[12]   Secondary Flows in Low-Pressure Turbines Cascades: Numerical and Experimental Investigation of the Impact of the Inner Part of the Boundary Layer [J].
Giovannini, Matteo ;
Rubechini, Filippo ;
Marconcini, Michele ;
Simoni, Daniele ;
Yepmo, Vianney ;
Bertini, Francesco .
JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2018, 140 (11)
[13]  
Gisbert F., 2022, ECCOMAS 8 EUR C COMP
[14]   Pressure and suction surfaces redesign for high-lift low-pressure turbines [J].
González, P ;
Ulizer, I ;
Vázquez, R ;
Hodson, HP .
JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2002, 124 (02) :161-166
[15]   Experimental and Numerical Characterization of Flow Through Highly Loaded Low-Pressure Turbine Cascade [J].
Gross, Andreas ;
Marks, Christopher R. ;
Sondergaard, Rolf ;
Bear, Philip S. ;
Wolff, J. Mitch .
JOURNAL OF PROPULSION AND POWER, 2018, 34 (01) :27-39
[16]   Acoustically Nonreflecting and Reflecting Boundary Conditions for Vorticity Injection in Compressible Solvers [J].
Guezennec, Nicolas ;
Poinsot, Thierry .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2009, 47 (07) :1709-1722
[17]  
Huynh H.T., 2007, AIAA J, P2007
[18]   ON THE IDENTIFICATION OF A VORTEX [J].
JEONG, J ;
HUSSAIN, F .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1995, 285 :69-94
[19]   FURTHER REMARKS ON REDUCING TRUNCATION ERRORS [J].
KAHAN, W .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 1965, 8 (01) :40-&
[20]   Numerical Predictions of Turbine Cascade Secondary Flows and Heat Transfer With Inflow Turbulence [J].
Kanani, Yousef ;
Acharya, Sumanta ;
Ames, Forrest .
JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2021, 143 (12)