Safety assessment of cryptocurrencies as risky assets during the COVID-19 pandemic

被引:1
作者
Belanes, Amel [1 ]
Saadaoui, Foued [2 ,3 ]
Amirat, Amina [1 ]
Rabbouch, Hana [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[2] UIR, Rabat Business Sch, Rabat, Morocco
[3] Univ Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia
[4] Higher Inst Management Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia
关键词
Cryptocurrencies; Stock market indexes; Downside risk; COVID-19; pandemic; DOWNSIDE RISK; BITCOIN; HAVEN; HEDGE; GOLD;
D O I
10.1016/j.physa.2024.130013
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
This study examines the safe-haven properties of cryptocurrencies during the COVID-19 pandemic by exploring various cryptocurrency allocation strategies and their impact on downside risk compared to holding only the stock market index. Spanning from 2019 to 2021, the analysis includes seven cryptocurrencies-Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, Dash, Maker, Monero, and NEO-and six stock market indexes-SP500, FTSE, CAC40, IBEX, AEX, and DJIM. The research introduces a portfolio optimization approach focused on mitigating significant losses during crises, employing Value at Risk (VaR), Modified Value at Risk (MVaR), and Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) metrics across different portfolio compositions. Findings highlight several key insights: higher cryptocurrency allocations correlate with increased downside risk, with none of the studied cryptocurrencies acting as a safe haven for international equity indexes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Relative MVaR exceeds CVaR across most combinations, and Maker demonstrates the highest downside risk, while Bitcoin and Litecoin exhibit the lowest risk levels based on CVaR and MVaR, respectively. Integration of the FTSE index is associated with peak risk levels, whereas incorporating DJIM and AEX shows reduced risk exposure. The study contributes novel insights into cryptocurrency risk dynamics during the COVID-19 pandemic, offering valuable implications for risk management strategies in investment portfolios.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] Ahmed M.D., 2023, Fractal signatures in the dynamics of an epidemiology, V1st, P19
  • [2] Downside risk
    Ang, Andrew
    Chen, Joseph
    Xing, Yuhang
    [J]. REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2006, 19 (04) : 1191 - 1239
  • [3] Effects of COVID-19 on cryptocurrency and emerging market connectedness: Empirical evidence from quantile, frequency, and lasso networks
    Balcilar, Mehmet
    Ozdemir, Huseyin
    Agan, Busra
    [J]. PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2022, 604
  • [4] Why is gold a safe haven?
    Baur, Dirk G.
    McDermott, Thomas K. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL FINANCE, 2016, 10 : 63 - 71
  • [5] Connectedness between emerging stock markets, gold, cryptocurrencies, DeFi and NFT: Some new evidence from wavelet analysis
    Bejaoui, Azza
    Frikha, Wajdi
    Jeribi, Ahmed
    Bariviera, Aurelio F.
    [J]. PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2023, 619
  • [6] Is gold a safe haven for the CIVETS countries under extremely adverse market conditions? Some new evidence from the MF-DCCA analysis
    Bentes, Sonia R.
    [J]. PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2023, 623
  • [7] On the stylized facts of precious metals' volatility: A comparative analysis of pre- and during COVID-19 crisis
    Bentes, Sonia R.
    [J]. PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2022, 600
  • [8] Bitcoin, gold, and commodities as safe havens for stocks: New insight through wavelet analysis
    Bouri, Elie
    Shahzad, Syed Jawad Hussain
    Roubaud, David
    Kristoufek, Ladislav
    Lucey, Brian
    [J]. QUARTERLY REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2020, 77 : 156 - 164
  • [9] Cryptocurrencies and the downside risk in equity investments
    Bouri, Elie
    Lucey, Brian
    Roubaud, David
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 33
  • [10] Bitcoin and global financial stress: A copula-based approach to dependence and causality in the quantiles
    Bouri, Elie
    Gupta, Rangan
    Lau, Chi Keung Marco
    Roubaud, David
    Wang, Shixuan
    [J]. QUARTERLY REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2018, 69 : 297 - 307