The Resurgence of Ideology under Xi Jinping and International Relations Scholarship in China

被引:1
作者
Mokry, Sabine [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hamburg, Inst Peace Res & Secur Policy, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
practice; China; knowledge production; international relations; authoritarian rule; Xi Jinping; practica; producci & oacute; n de conocimiento; relaciones internacionales; gobierno autoritario; pratique; Chine; production de connaissances; relations internationales; regime autoritaire; SCHOOL; WORLD;
D O I
10.1093/isp/ekae014
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
This article examines how the increased emphasis on ideology under Xi Jinping has impacted Chinese IR scholarship published in Chinese- and English-language academic journals, as well as research funding awarded by the National Planning Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences. It finds that ideological concepts featured increasingly prominently in awarded research funding and published scholarship the longer Xi Jinping has been in office. Considerable decreases in thematic diversity were noticeable in funding and publications. The article finds that the resurgence of ideology further exacerbated differences between scholars who are relatively close to the state and scholars who are more distant from the state. Close scholars publish more on ideological concepts, but their scholarship is also characterized by a higher degree of thematic diversity than distant scholars'. Drawing on scholars' biographical data, publicly available data on research funding, and bibliometric data collected from Chinese- and English-language academic journals, this article offers a systematic account of the status quo of the IR discipline in China. In addition, it offers insights into the conditions for social science scholarship under authoritarian rule by proposing a novel conceptualization and measurement of scholars' proximity to the state, which could also be applied to other authoritarian settings. Este art & iacute;culo estudia c & oacute;mo el mayor & eacute;nfasis sobre la ideolog & iacute;a que tuvo lugar bajo el Gobierno de Xi Jinping ha impactado sobre el trabajo acad & eacute;mico chino, publicado en revistas acad & eacute;micas en chino e ingl & eacute;s, en materia de RRII y sobre la financiaci & oacute;n de la investigaci & oacute;n otorgada por la Oficina Nacional de Planificaci & oacute;n de Filosof & iacute;a y Ciencias Sociales. El art & iacute;culo concluye que, durante el tiempo que Xi Jinping lleva en el cargo, los conceptos ideol & oacute;gicos han ido ocupando un lugar cada vez m & aacute;s destacado en la financiaci & oacute;n de la investigaci & oacute;n y en el trabajo acad & eacute;mico publicado. Se observaron disminuciones considerables en materia de diversidad tem & aacute;tica, tanto a efectos de financiaci & oacute;n como a nivel de publicaciones. El art & iacute;culo concluye que este resurgimiento de la ideolog & iacute;a exacerb & oacute; a & uacute;n m & aacute;s las diferencias existentes entre los acad & eacute;micos que son m & aacute;s afines al Estado y los acad & eacute;micos que son menos afines al Estado. Los acad & eacute;micos m & aacute;s afines al Estado realizan m & aacute;s publicaciones en materia de conceptos ideol & oacute;gicos, pero su trabajo acad & eacute;mico tambi & eacute;n se caracteriza por un mayor grado de diversidad tem & aacute;tica que la de los acad & eacute;micos menos afines. Este art & iacute;culo ofrece, partiendo de los datos biogr & aacute;ficos de los acad & eacute;micos, de los datos disponibles p & uacute;blicamente con relaci & oacute;n a la financiaci & oacute;n de la investigaci & oacute;n y de los datos bibliom & eacute;tricos recopilados de revistas acad & eacute;micas en chino e ingl & eacute;s, una descripci & oacute;n sistem & aacute;tica del statu quo de la disciplina de las RRII en China. Adem & aacute;s, el art & iacute;culo ofrece una visi & oacute;n de las condiciones para el trabajo acad & eacute;mico en materia de ciencias sociales bajo un r & eacute;gimen autoritario. Para ello, el art & iacute;culo propone una nueva conceptualizaci & oacute;n y una nueva manera de medir el grado de proximidad de los acad & eacute;micos con respecto al Estado, la cual tambi & eacute;n podr & iacute;a aplicarse a otros entornos autoritarios. Cet article analyse l'effet de l'intensification de l'accent sur l'id & eacute;ologie sous Xi Jinping sur la recherche chinoise en RI publi & eacute;e dans des revues acad & eacute;miques en langue chinoise et anglaise ainsi que sur les financements de recherche accord & eacute;s par le National Planning Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences. Il remarque que les concepts id & eacute;ologiques occupent une part plus pro & eacute;minente dans les financements de recherche octroy & eacute;s et la recherche publi & eacute;e & agrave; mesure des ann & eacute;es o & ugrave; Xi Jinping est au pouvoir. L'on observe une baisse notoire de la diversit & eacute; th & eacute;matique dans le financement et les publications. L'article conclut que la r & eacute;surgence de l'id & eacute;ologie renforce plus avant les diff & eacute;rences entre les chercheurs relativement proches de l'& Eacute;tat et les chercheurs qui se montrent davantage distants. Les publications des chercheurs qui sont proches portent plus souvent sur des concepts id & eacute;ologiques, mais leur recherche se caract & eacute;rise & eacute;galement par un degr & eacute; plus & eacute;lev & eacute; de diversit & eacute; th & eacute;matique que les chercheurs distants. En se fondant sur des donn & eacute;es biographiques de chercheurs, des donn & eacute;es accessibles au public sur les financements de recherche et sur des donn & eacute;es bibliom & eacute;triques extraites de revues acad & eacute;miques en langue chinoise et anglaise, cet article propose un passage en revue syst & eacute;matique du statu quo de la discipline des RI en Chine. En outre, il fournit des informations sur les conditions de la recherche en sciences sociales sous un r & eacute;gime autoritaire en proposant une conceptualisation et une mesure in & eacute;dites de la proximit & eacute; des chercheurs avec l'& Eacute;tat, que l'on pourrait aussi appliquer & agrave; d'autres cadres autoritaires.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   International Relations studies in Asia: distinctive trajectories [J].
Alagappa, Muthiah .
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS OF THE ASIA-PACIFIC, 2011, 11 (02) :193-230
[2]   Academic freedom in Tajikistan: how the suppression, acquiesce and incorporation of intellectuals strengthens the state and affects knowledge production [J].
Antonov, Oleg ;
Lemon, Edward ;
Mullojonov, Parviz .
CENTRAL ASIAN SURVEY, 2021, 40 (04) :592-610
[3]   A Strong Leader for A Time of Crisis: Xi Jinping's Strongman Politics as A Collective Response to Regime Weakness [J].
Baranovitch, Nimrod .
JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY CHINA, 2021, 30 (128) :249-265
[4]   Ideology in the Era of Xi Jinping [J].
Brown, Kerry ;
Berzina-Cerenkova, Una Aleksandra .
JOURNAL OF CHINESE POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 23 (03) :323-339
[5]   Political Changes in China Since the 19th CCP Congress: Xi Jinping Is Not Weaker But More Contested [J].
Cabestan, Jean-Pierre .
EAST ASIA, 2019, 36 (01) :1-21
[6]   Fantastic Theories and Where to Find Them: Rethinking Interlocutors in Global IR [J].
Chu, Sinan .
MILLENNIUM-JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES, 2022, 50 (03) :700-729
[7]  
Feng Huiyun., 2019, Chinese Scholars and Foreign Policy: Debating International Relations, V320
[8]  
Florance Yang., 2021, Issues Studies, V57
[9]  
Gore LLP, 2023, CHINA INT J, V21, P8
[10]   Ideology after the end of ideology. China and the quest for autocratic legitimation [J].
Holbig, Heike .
DEMOCRATIZATION, 2013, 20 (01) :61-81