Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards for Interventions That Use Artificial Intelligence (CHEERS-AI)

被引:5
作者
Elvidge, Jamie [1 ]
Hawksworth, Claire [1 ]
Zemplenyi, Antal [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Chalkidou, Anastasia [1 ]
Petrou, Stavros [5 ]
Petyko, Zsuzsanna
Srivastava, Divya [6 ]
Chandra, Gunjan [7 ]
Delaye, Julien [8 ]
Denniston, Alastair [9 ]
Gomes, Manuel [10 ]
Knies, Saskia
Nousios, Petros
Siirtola, Pekka [7 ]
Wang, Junfeng
Dawoud, Dalia [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Hlth & Care Excellence NICE, London, England
[2] Univ Pecs, Ctr Hlth Technol Assessment & Pharmacoecon Res, Pecs, Hungary
[3] Univ Colorado Anschutz Med Campus, Denver, CO USA
[4] Syreon Res Inst, Budapest, Hungary
[5] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci, Oxford, England
[6] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Dept Hlth Policy, London, England
[7] Univ Oulu, Biomimet & Intelligent Syst Grp, Oulu, Finland
[8] EURORDIS, Brussels, Belgium
[9] Univ Birmingham, Inst Inflammat & Ageing, Birmingham, England
[10] UCL, Dept Primary Care & Populat Hlth, London, England
关键词
artificial intelligence; CHEERS checklist; health economic evaluation; reporting guideline; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jval.2024.05.006
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objectives: Economic evaluations (EEs) are commonly used by decision makers to understand the value of health interventions. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS 2022) provide reporting guidelines for EEs. Healthcare systems will increasingly see new interventions that use artificial intelligence (AI) to perform their function. We developed Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards for Interventions that use AI (CHEERS-AI) to ensure EEs of AI-based health interventions are reported in a transparent and reproducible manner. Methods: Potential CHEERS-AI reporting items were informed by 2 published systematic literature reviews of EEs and a contemporary update. A Delphi study was conducted using 3 survey rounds to elicit multidisciplinary expert views on 26 potential items, through a 9-point Likert rating scale and qualitative comments. An online consensus meeting was held to finalize outstanding reporting items. A digital health patient group reviewed the final checklist from a patient perspective. Results: A total of 58 participants responded to survey round 1, 42, and 31 of whom responded to rounds 2 and 3, respectively. Nine participants joined the consensus meeting. Ultimately, 38 reporting items were included in CHEERS-AI. They comprised the 28 original CHEERS 2022 items, plus 10 new AI-specific reporting items. Additionally, 8 of the original CHEERS 2022 items were elaborated on to ensure AI-specific nuance is reported. Conclusions: CHEERS-AI should be used when reporting an EE of an intervention that uses AI to perform its function. CHEERS-AI will help decision makers and reviewers to understand important AI-specific details of an intervention, and any implications for the EE methods used and cost-effectiveness conclusions.
引用
收藏
页码:1196 / 1205
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [31] Reporting guidelines for clinical trials of artificial intelligence interventions: the SPIRIT-AI and CONSORT-AI guidelines
    Ibrahim, Hussein
    Liu, Xiaoxuan
    Rivera, Samantha Cruz
    Moher, David
    Chan, An-Wen
    Sydes, Matthew R.
    Calvert, Melanie J.
    Denniston, Alastair K.
    TRIALS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [32] Reporting guidelines for clinical trials of artificial intelligence interventions: the SPIRIT-AI and CONSORT-AI guidelines
    Hussein Ibrahim
    Xiaoxuan Liu
    Samantha Cruz Rivera
    David Moher
    An-Wen Chan
    Matthew R. Sydes
    Melanie J. Calvert
    Alastair K. Denniston
    Trials, 22
  • [33] MINIMAR (MINimum Information for Medical Al Reporting): Developing reporting standards for artificial intelligence in health care
    Hernandez-Boussard, Tina
    Bozkurt, Selen
    Ioannidis, John P. A.
    Shah, Nigam H.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2020, 27 (12) : 2011 - 2015
  • [34] Economic evaluations of artificial intelligence-based healthcare interventions: a systematic literature review of best practices in their conduct and reporting
    Vithlani, Jai
    Hawksworth, Claire
    Elvidge, Jamie
    Ayiku, Lynda
    Dawoud, Dalia
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [35] Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in psychiatry and mental health care: a systematic review
    Kolding, Sara
    Lundin, Robert M.
    Hansen, Lasse
    Ostergaard, Soren Dinesen
    ACTA NEUROPSYCHIATRICA, 2024,
  • [36] Health economic evaluation of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based rapid nutritional diagnostic system for hospitalised patients: A multicentre, randomised controlled trial
    Sun, Ming-Yao
    Wang, Yu
    Zheng, Tian
    Wang, Xue
    Lin, Fan
    Zheng, Lu-Yan
    Wang, Mao-Yue
    Zhang, Pian-Hong
    Chen, Lu-Ying
    Yao, Ying
    Sun, Jie
    Li, Zeng-Ning
    Hu, Huan-Yu
    Jiang, Hua
    Yue, Han-Yang
    Zhao, Qian
    Wang, Hai-Yan
    Han, Lei
    Ma, Xuan
    Ji, Meng-Ting
    Xu, Hong-Xia
    Luo, Si-Yu
    Liu, Ying-Hua
    Zhang, Yong
    Han, Ting
    Li, Yan-Sheng
    Hou, Peng-Peng
    Chen, Wei
    CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2024, 43 (10) : 2327 - 2335
  • [37] Patient consent for the secondary use of health data in artificial intelligence (AI) models: A scoping review
    Moulaei, Khadijeh
    Akhlaghpour, Saeed
    Fatehi, Farhad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2025, 198
  • [38] Evaluation of the potential value of artificial intelligence (AI) in public health using fluoride intake as the example
    Wei, Wei
    Gu, Tianshu
    Cao, Yanhong
    Sun, Shuqiu
    Wei, Dan
    Li, Minghui
    Fly, Alyce D.
    Gu, Weikuan
    Yao, Lan
    Sun, Dianjun
    ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 2025, 291
  • [39] Potential Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Disaster Risk and Emergency Health Management: A Critical Appraisal on Environmental Health
    Bari, Lazima Faiah
    Ahmed, Iftekhar
    Ahamed, Rayhan
    Zihan, Tawhid Ahmed
    Sharmin, Sabrina
    Pranto, Abir Hasan
    Islam, Md. Rabiul
    ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH INSIGHTS, 2023, 17
  • [40] QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION OF WILLINGNESS TO USE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE WITHIN BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC ACADEMIC ENVIRONMENT
    Serban, Daniela
    Cristache, Silvia Elena
    Ciobotar, Narcisa Georgeta
    Francu, Laurentiu Gabriel
    Mansour, Jiries
    AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC, 2024, 26 (65) : 259 - 274