Gender rating gap in online reviews

被引:1
作者
Bayerl, Andreas [1 ]
Dover, Yaniv [2 ,3 ]
Riemer, Hila [4 ]
Shapira, Daniel [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Econ, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Hebrew Univ Business Sch, Jerusalem, Israel
[3] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Federmann Ctr Study Rat, Edmond J Safra Campus, Jerusalem, Israel
[4] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Dept Management, Beer Sheva, Israel
[5] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Dept Business Adm, Beer Sheva, Israel
[6] Univ Mannheim, Business Sch, Mannheim, Germany
基金
以色列科学基金会;
关键词
WORD-OF-MOUTH; NEGATIVE EVALUATION; SELF-PRESENTATION; ACQUIESCENCE; COEFFICIENTS; POWER; FEAR;
D O I
10.1038/s41562-024-02003-6
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Although online reviews are used by many people to make decisions, these reviews may be biased. On the basis of 1.2 billion observations across five leading online review platforms and two lab studies (n = 1,172 and n = 1,165; US respondents fluent in English), we provide evidence for a consistent and systematic gender rating gap: women's mean online review ratings are significantly more favourable than men's. We suggest that although men and women, on average, generally do not differ in their 'real' attitudes, their ratings do differ when it comes to online reviews. Our lab studies revealed that such differences are due to gender differences in the propensity to share negative attitudes online, possibly due to women's greater concern about social consequences. Our findings highlight the need for societal change to create conditions in which people, particularly women, feel comfortable publicly expressing genuine attitudes, especially in cases of dissatisfaction, without being concerned about the consequences. Across 1.2 billion data points, Bayerl et al. find that women submit higher online review ratings than men, which is probably due to their greater concern about social consequences when sharing negative feedback.
引用
收藏
页码:507 / 520
页数:17
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]  
Aguiar L., MARK SCI
[2]   Science must respect the dignity and rights of all humans [J].
不详 .
NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR, 2022, 6 (08) :1029-1031
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Racial and Ethnic Diversity in the United States: 2010 Census and 2020 Census
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2019, WOMEN MEN USE THEIR
[5]   STUDIES OF INDEPENDENCE AND CONFORMITY .1. A MINORITY OF ONE AGAINST A UNANIMOUS MAJORITY [J].
ASCH, SE .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, 1956, 70 (09) :1-70
[6]   How gender determines the way we speak about professionals [J].
Atir, Stav ;
Ferguson, Melissa J. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2018, 115 (28) :7278-7283
[7]   Gender differences in leisure-time physical activity [J].
Azevedo, Mario Renato ;
Pavin Araujo, Cora Luiza ;
Reichert, Felipe Fossati ;
Siqueira, Fernando Vinholes ;
da Silva, Marcelo Cozzensa ;
Hallal, Pedro Curi .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2007, 52 (01) :8-15
[8]   Female In-Class Participation and Performance Increase with More Female Peers and/or a Female Instructor in Life Sciences Courses [J].
Bailey, E. G. ;
Greenall, R. F. ;
Baek, D. M. ;
Morris, C. ;
Nelson, N. ;
Quirante, T. M. ;
Rice, N. S. ;
Rose, S. ;
Williams, K. R. .
CBE-LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2020, 19 (03) :1-14
[9]  
Bakan D., 1966, DUALITY HUMAN EXISTE
[10]  
Bakshi S., 2012, Journal of Research in Commerce and Management, V1, P1