Fuzzy Risk Assessment Method for Airborne Network Security Based on AHP-TOPSIS

被引:2
作者
Wang, Kenian [1 ,2 ]
Hong, Yuan [1 ,2 ]
Li, Chunxiao [2 ]
机构
[1] Civil Aviat Univ China, Coll Safety Sci & Engn, Tianjin 300300, Peoples R China
[2] Civil Aviat Univ China, Key Lab Airworthiness Certificat Technol Civil Avi, Tianjin 300300, Peoples R China
来源
CMC-COMPUTERS MATERIALS & CONTINUA | 2024年 / 80卷 / 01期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Airborne networks; information security risk assessment; cognitive uncertainty; Pythagorean fuzzy sets;
D O I
10.32604/cmc.2024.052088
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
With the exponential increase in information security risks, ensuring the safety of aircraft heavily relies on the accurate performance of risk assessment. However, experts possess a limited understanding of fundamental security elements, such as assets, threats, and vulnerabilities, due to the confidentiality of airborne networks, resulting in cognitive uncertainty. Therefore, the Pythagorean fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is proposed to address the expert cognitive uncertainty during information security risk assessment for airborne networks. First, Pythagorean fuzzy AHP is employed to construct an index system and quantify the pairwise comparison matrix for determining the index weights, which is used to solve the expert cognitive uncertainty in the process of evaluating the index system weight of airborne networks. Second, Pythagorean fuzzy the TOPSIS to an Ideal Solution is utilized to assess the risk prioritization of airborne networks using the Pythagorean fuzzy weighted distance measure, which is used to address the cognitive uncertainty in the evaluation process of various indicators in airborne network threat scenarios. Finally, a comparative analysis was conducted. The proposed method demonstrated the highest Kendall coordination coefficient of 0.952. This finding indicates superior consistency and confirms the efficacy of the method in addressing expert cognition during information security risk assessment for airborne networks.
引用
收藏
页码:1123 / 1142
页数:20
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Aeronautical Radio Inc, Avionics full-duplex switched (AFDX) ethernet: ARINC 664 P7
[2]   Multi-criteria group decisionmaking based on ELECTRE I method in Pythagorean fuzzy information [J].
Akram, Muhammad ;
Ilyas, Farwa ;
Garg, Harish .
SOFT COMPUTING, 2020, 24 (05) :3425-3453
[3]  
Averyanova Y., 2020, 2020 INT S AUT INF C
[4]   AHP integrated TOPSIS and VIKOR methods with Pythagorean fuzzy sets to prioritize risks in self-driving vehicles [J].
Bakioglu, Gozde ;
Atahan, Ali Osman .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2021, 99
[5]   Pythagorean fuzzy DEMATEL method for supplier selection in sustainable supply chain management [J].
Giri, Bibhas Chandra ;
Molla, Mahatab Uddin ;
Biswas, Pranab .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2022, 193
[6]   Security Threat and Vulnerability Assessment and Measurement in Secure Software Development [J].
Humayun, Mamoona ;
Jhanjhi, N. Z. ;
Almufareh, Maram Fahhad ;
Khalil, Muhammad Ibrahim .
CMC-COMPUTERS MATERIALS & CONTINUA, 2022, 71 (03) :5039-5059
[7]  
Hwang C., 1981, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, V1st, P69, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9]
[8]   A Neuroadaptive Cognitive Model for Dealing With Uncertainty in Tracing Pilots' Cognitive State [J].
Klaproth, Oliver W. ;
Halbruegge, Marc ;
Krol, Laurens R. ;
Vernaleken, Christoph ;
Zander, Thorsten O. ;
Russwinkel, Nele .
TOPICS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2020, 12 (03) :1012-1029
[9]  
Li G., 2019, Modern Electron. Tech., V42, P41
[10]  
Li J., 2020, 2020 INT S AUT INF C