Efficacy of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin in the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection: A systematic meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Zhao, Zihan [1 ]
Wu, Yarui [1 ]
Geng, Xuhua [1 ]
Yuan, Congrui [1 ]
Fu, Yi [1 ]
Yang, Guibin [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Aerosp Ctr Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
关键词
Clostridium difficile infection; fidaxomicin; meta-analysis; vancomycin; EPIDEMIOLOGY; CARRIAGE; DIARRHEA;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000039213
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare the efficacy, recurrence rate, adverse event rate and mortality of fidaxomicin compared with vancomycin in treating different types of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Methods: A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and clinical trial registration databases for research on fidaxomicin versus vancomycin in the treatment of CDI and the retrieval period extended from the establishment of the database to July 22, 2022. A total of 15 studies were included, including 8 RCTs and 7 retrospective cohort studies. Results: Results showed that there was no significant difference in the overall efficacy of the treatment between fidaxomicin and vancomycin, and results in the subgroups of CDI hypervirulent strains and recurrent CDI were obtained, but vancomycin was more effective than fidaxomicin in the treatment of severe CDI (RR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.90-0.98, P < .01). Results showed that fidaxomicin is superior to vancomycin in terms of 40-day recurrence rate (RR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.38-0.70, P < .01), 60-day recurrence rate (RR = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.21-0.69, P < .01) and 90-day recurrence rate (RR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.50-0.77, P < .01). For the recurrence rate of the treatment in CDI hypervirulent strains, severe CDI and recurrent CDI, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups. In addition, there was no significant difference in the incidence of clinical adverse reactions, and same outcomes appeared in all-cause mortality at 40-day, severe CDI and recurrent CDI, but fidaxomicin was superior to vancomycin in all-cause mortality over 60-day (RR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.34-0.96, P = .03). Conclusion: There were no significant differences between fidaxomicin and vancomycin in the treatment of CDI in therapeutic effectiveness and adverse reactions, while fidaxomicin was superior to vancomycin in terms of recurrence rate and long-term mortality, and vancomycin is more effective in treating severe CDI.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Fidaxomicin In Clostridium difficile Infection
    Duggan, Sean T.
    DRUGS, 2011, 71 (18) : 2445 - 2456
  • [42] Clinical and Economic Benefits of Fidaxomicin Compared to Vancomycin for Clostridium difficile Infection
    Gallagher, Jason C.
    Reilly, Joseph P.
    Navalkele, Bhagyashri
    Downham, Gemma
    Haynes, Kevin
    Trivedi, Manish
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2015, 59 (11) : 7007 - 7010
  • [43] Efficacy of different faecal microbiota transplantation protocols for Clostridium difficile infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ianiro, Gianluca
    Maida, Marcello
    Burisch, Johan
    Simonelli, Claudia
    Hold, Georgina
    Ventimiglia, Marco
    Gasbarrini, Antonio
    Cammarota, Giovanni
    UNITED EUROPEAN GASTROENTEROLOGY JOURNAL, 2018, 6 (08) : 1232 - 1244
  • [44] Advances in the treatment of Clostridium difficile with fidaxomicin: a narrow spectrum antibiotic
    Sears, Pamela
    Ichikawa, Yoshi
    Ruiz, Nancy
    Gorbach, Sherwood
    PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCE TO IMPROVE THE HUMAN CONDITION: PRIX GALIEN USA 2012, 2013, 1291 : 33 - 41
  • [45] Fidaxomicin: A Macrocyclic Antibiotic for the Management of Clostridium difficile Infection
    Sullivan, Karyn M.
    Spooner, Linda M.
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2010, 44 (02) : 352 - 359
  • [46] Vancomycin Enema in the Treatment of Clostridium difficile Infection
    Fawley, Jason
    Napolitano, Lena M.
    SURGICAL INFECTIONS, 2019, 20 (04) : 311 - 316
  • [47] Oral vancomycin versus metronidazole for the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Igarashi, Yuki
    Tashiro, Sho
    Enoki, Yuki
    Taguchi, Kazuaki
    Matsumoto, Kazuaki
    Ohge, Hiroki
    Suzuki, Hiromichi
    Nakamura, Atsushi
    Mori, Nobuaki
    Morinaga, Yoshitomo
    Yamagishi, Yuka
    Yoshizawa, Sadako
    Yanagihara, Katsunori
    Mikamo, Hiroshige
    Kunishima, Hiroyuki
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2018, 24 (11) : 907 - 914
  • [48] Systematic review with meta-analysis: the efficacy of faecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of recurrent and refractory Clostridium difficile infection
    Quraishi, M. N.
    Widlak, M.
    Bhala, N.
    Moore, D.
    Price, M.
    Sharma, N.
    Iqbal, T. H.
    ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2017, 46 (05) : 479 - 493
  • [49] Efficacy of oral vancomycin prophylaxis for prevention of Clostridioides difficile infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tariq, Raseen
    Laguio-Vila, Maryrose
    Tahir, Muhammad Waqas
    Orenstein, Robert
    Pardi, Darrell S.
    Khanna, Sahil
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 14
  • [50] Risk Factors for Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Deshpande, Abhishek
    Pasupuleti, Vinay
    Thota, Priyaleela
    Pant, Chaitanya
    Rolston, David D. K.
    Hernandez, Adrian V.
    Donskey, Curtis J.
    Fraser, Thomas G.
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 36 (04) : 452 - 460