Why, When, and for Whom Does Career Education in Secondary Schools Work? A Qualitative Study of Stakeholders' Perspectives in The Netherlands

被引:0
作者
de Vries, Nicky [1 ]
Meeter, Martijn [1 ]
Huizinga, Mariette [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Fac Behav & Moment Sci, Dept Educ & Family Studies, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
EDUCATION SCIENCES | 2024年 / 14卷 / 07期
关键词
career education; secondary education; mechanisms; qualitative research; development; adolescents; higher education; LIFE-SPACE APPROACH; EXPERIENCES; COMPETENCES; IDENTITY;
D O I
10.3390/educsci14070681
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Career education in secondary schools plays a pivotal role in supporting students as they navigate the complex decision-making process involved in the transition to higher education. However, the evidence base regarding the effectiveness of career education is limited and fragmented, with a distinct lack of clarity regarding the underlying mechanisms. This study aimed to identify the best practices and underlying mechanisms of career education within Dutch secondary education. Based on focus group interviews with stakeholders with diverse interests and positions (N = 25), we identified five categories of best practice activities alongside a framework consisting of ten mediators, eight moderators, a meta-moderator, and four contextual factors. This framework, while reinforcing some previous identified mechanisms, brings new elements into focus, distinguishing additional mechanisms and their categorisation as mediators, moderators, and contextual factors. These findings may serve as a foundational framework for future research and can support schools in enhancing their career education curricula. It is crucial that career education activities align with the students' current capacities and potential for growth, ensuring that these programs are responsive to students' developmental stages and their zone of proximal development.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2010, Learning for Jobs
  • [2] ATLAS.ti, Scientific Software Development GmbH
  • [3] Austin K., 2022, Best-Practice Career Education for Students from Low Socioeconomic Status Backgrounds: Final Report
  • [4] Methodological reflections on using qualitative research to explore the causal mechanisms of complex health interventions
    Bonell, Chris
    Warren, Emily
    Melendez-Torres, G. J.
    [J]. EVALUATION, 2022, 28 (02) : 166 - 181
  • [5] Does Expert Advice Improve Educational Choice?
    Borghans, Lex
    Golsteyn, Bart H. H.
    Stenberg, Anders
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (12):
  • [6] Braun V., 2006, Qualitative Research in Psychology, V3, P77, DOI [DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
  • [7] Tertiary Education, Changing One's Educational Decision and the Role of Parental Preferences
    Christoph, Bernhard
    Spangenberg, Heike
    Quast, Heiko
    [J]. RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2024, 65 (02) : 283 - 302
  • [8] Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance
    Craig, Peter
    Dieppe, Paul
    Macintyre, Sally
    Michie, Susan
    Nazareth, Irwin
    Petticrew, Mark
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 337 (7676): : 979 - 983
  • [9] Commentary: Are complex parenting interventions less than the sum of their parts? A reflection on Leijten et al. (2022)
    Fearon, Pasco
    Sonuga-Barke, Edmund
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 63 (04) : 500 - 502
  • [10] School based experiences as contributors to career decision-making: findings from a cross-sectional survey of high-school students
    Galliott, Natal'ya
    Graham, Linda J.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER, 2015, 42 (02) : 179 - 199