Comparison of intravenous versus perineural dexamethasone as a local anaesthetic adjunct for peripheral nerve blocks in the lower limb

被引:10
作者
Desai, Neel [1 ]
Pararajasingham, Suji [1 ]
Onwochei, Desire [1 ]
Albrecht, Eric [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Guys & St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Anaesthesia, London, England
[2] Lausanne Univ Hosp, Lausanne, Switzerland
[3] Univ Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
REGIONAL-ANESTHESIA; ANALGESIA; BUPIVACAINE; DURATION; MEPIVACAINE; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1097/EJA.0000000000002038
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUNDAs a local anaesthetic adjunct, the systemic absorption of perineural dexamethasone in the lower limb could be restricted because of decreased vascularity when compared with the upper limb.OBJECTIVESTo compare the pharmacodynamic characteristics of intravenous and perineural dexamethasone in the lower limb.DESIGNSystematic review of randomised controlled trials with meta-analysis.DATA SOURCESSystematic search of Central, Google Scholar, Ovid Embase and Ovid Medline to 18 July 2023.ELIGIBILITY CRITERIARandomised controlled trials, which compared the intravenous with perineural administration of dexamethasone as a local anaesthetic adjunct in peripheral nerve blocks for surgery of the lower limb.RESULTSThe most common peripheral nerve blocks were femoral, sciatic and ankle block. The local anaesthetic was long acting in all trials and the dose of dexamethasone was 8 mg in most trials. The primary outcome, the duration of analgesia, was investigated by all nine trials (n = 546 patients). Overall, compared with intravenous dexamethasone, perineural dexamethasone increased the duration of analgesia from 19.54 to 22.27 h, a mean difference [95% confidence interval (CI) of 2.73 (1.07 to 4.38) h; P = 0.001, I2 = 87]. The quality of evidence was moderate owing to serious inconsistency. However, analysis based on the location of the peripheral nerve block, the type of local anaesthetic or the use of perineural adrenaline showed no difference in duration between intravenous and perineural dexamethasone. No differences were shown for any of the secondary outcomes related to efficacy and side effects.CONCLUSIONIn summary, moderate evidence supports the superiority of perineural dexamethasone over intravenous dexamethasone in prolonging the duration of analgesia. However, this difference is unlikely to be clinically relevant. Consideration of the perineural use of dexamethasone should recognise that this route of administration remains off label.
引用
收藏
页码:749 / 759
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Abdelaziz AA., 2020, Q J Med An Int J Med, V113, pi5
[2]  
Abdelhamid BM., 2016, J Anesth Clin Res, V7, P601
[3]   Can systematic reviews with sparse data be trusted? [J].
Afshari, A. ;
Wetterslev, J. ;
Smith, A. F. .
ANAESTHESIA, 2017, 72 (01) :12-16
[4]   PHARMACOKINETICS OF LOCAL-ANESTHETICS [J].
ARTHUR, GR ;
COVINO, BG .
BAILLIERES CLINICAL ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 1991, 5 (03) :635-658
[5]   Efficacy of perineural vs systemic dexamethasone to prolong analgesia after peripheral nerve block: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Baeriswyl, M. ;
Kirkham, K. R. ;
Jacot-Guillarmod, A. ;
Albrecht, E. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2017, 119 (02) :183-191
[6]   GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence [J].
Balshem, Howard ;
Helfand, Mark ;
Schuenemann, Holger J. ;
Oxman, Andrew D. ;
Kunz, Regina ;
Brozek, Jan ;
Vist, Gunn E. ;
Falck-Ytter, Yngve ;
Meerpohl, Joerg ;
Norris, Susan ;
Guyatt, Gordon H. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 64 (04) :401-406
[7]   Ultrasound Guidance Reduces the Risk of Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity Following Peripheral Nerve Blockade [J].
Barrington, Michael J. ;
Kluger, Roman .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2013, 38 (04) :289-297
[8]  
Benyamin R, 2008, PAIN PHYSICIAN, V11, pS105
[9]  
Bhatia N., 2019, Reg Anesth Pain Med, V44, pA74
[10]   Perineural Versus Intravenous Dexamethasone as an Adjuvant for Peripheral Nerve Blocks A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Chong, Matthew Alan ;
Berbenetz, Nicolas Matthew ;
Lin, Cheng ;
Singh, Sudha .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2017, 42 (03) :319-326