Predicting Reactivity and Passivation of Solid-State Battery Interfaces

被引:0
|
作者
Lomeli, Eder G. [1 ,2 ]
Ransom, Brandi [1 ]
Ramdas, Akash [1 ]
Jost, Daniel [2 ]
Moritz, Brian [2 ]
Sendek, Austin D. [1 ]
Reed, Evan J. [1 ]
Devereaux, Thomas P. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Inst Mat & Energy Sci, SLAC Natl Accelerator Lab, Menlo Pk, CA 94025 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Geballe Lab Adv Mat, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
DFT; AIMD; machine learning; solid-statebatteries; materials discovery; solid electrolytes; ELECTROLYTES; STABILITY; ANODE;
D O I
10.1021/acsami.4c06095
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ;
摘要
In this work, we build a computationally inexpensive, data-driven model that utilizes atomistic structure information to predict the reactivity of interfaces between any candidate solid-state electrolyte material and a Li metal anode. This model is trained on data from ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulations of the time evolution of the solid electrolyte-Li metal interfaces for 67 different materials. Predicting the reactivity of solid-state interfaces with ab initio techniques remains an elusive challenge in materials discovery and informatics, and previous work on predicting interfacial compatibility of solid-state Li-ion electrolytes and Li metal anodes has focused mainly on thermodynamic convex hull calculations. Our framework involves training machine learning models on AIMD data, thereby capturing information on both kinetics and thermodynamics, and then leveraging these models to predict the reactivity of thousands of new candidates in the span of seconds, avoiding the need for additional weeks-long AIMD simulations. We identify over 300 new chemically stable and over 780 passivating solid electrolytes that are predicted to be thermodynamically unfavored. Our results indicate many potential solid-state electrolyte candidates have been incorrectly labeled unstable via purely thermodynamic approaches using density functional theory (DFT) energetics, and that the pool of promising, Li-stable solid-state electrolyte materials may be much larger than previously thought from screening efforts. To showcase the value of our approach, we highlight two borate materials that were identified by our model and confirmed by further AIMD calculations to likely be highly conductive and chemically stable with Li: LiB13C2 and LiB12PC
引用
收藏
页码:51584 / 51594
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Solid-state reactivity at heterophase interfaces
    Backhaus-Ricoult, M
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF MATERIALS RESEARCH, 2003, 33 : 55 - 90
  • [2] Predicting low-impedance interfaces for solid-state batteries
    Swift, Michael W.
    Jagad, Harsh
    Park, Jiyun
    Qie, Yu
    Wu, Yuqin
    Qi, Yue
    CURRENT OPINION IN SOLID STATE & MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2022, 26 (03):
  • [3] INTERFACES IN SOLID-STATE REACTIONS
    CARTER, CB
    BERICHTE DER BUNSEN-GESELLSCHAFT-PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1986, 90 (08): : 643 - 649
  • [4] Interfaces: Key Issue to Be Solved for All Solid-State Lithium Battery Technologies
    Ding, Zhanlai
    Li, Jianlong
    Li, Jiao
    An, Cunran
    JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2020, 167 (07)
  • [5] High-performance garnet solid-state battery enabled by improved interfaces
    Wang, Bo
    Guo, Wei
    Fu, Yongzhu
    JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2022, 542
  • [7] PHOTORECHARGEABLE SOLID-STATE BATTERY
    KANBARA, T
    TAKADA, K
    YAMAMURA, Y
    KONDO, S
    SOLID STATE IONICS, 1990, 40-1 (pt 2) : 955 - 958
  • [9] Solid-state dion battery
    Spila, E
    Panero, S
    Scrosati, B
    ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA, 1998, 43 (10-11) : 1651 - 1653
  • [10] SOLID-STATE RESERVE BATTERY
    KENNEDY, JH
    CHEN, F
    MILES, RC
    JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1973, 120 (02) : 171 - 182