Harnessing Generative AI (GenAI) for Automated Feedback in Higher Education: A Systematic Review

被引:9
作者
Lee, Sophia Soomin [1 ]
Moore, Robert L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
来源
ONLINE LEARNING | 2024年 / 28卷 / 03期
关键词
Generative AI; chatbots; artificial intelligence; higher education; automated feedback; human-AI interaction; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.24059/olj.v28i3.4593
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In this systematic review, we synthesize ten empirical peer-reviewed articles published between 2019 and 2023 that used generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) for automated feedback in higher education. There are significant opportunities and challenges to integrate these tools effectively into learning environments as the demand for timely and personalized feedback grows. We examine the articles based on instructional contexts and system characteristics, identifying critical implementation possibilities for GenAI in automated feedback. Our findings reveal that GenAI provides diverse feedback across various contexts with multiple instructional purposes. GenAI systems can reduce instructor workload by automating routine grading and feedback tasks, allowing educators to focus on more complex teaching responsibilities with augmented capabilities. Additionally, these systems enhance communication, offer cognitive and emotional support, and improve accessibility by creating supportive, stress-free learning environments. Overall, implementing GenAI automated feedback systems improves educational outcomes and creates a more efficient and supportive learning environment for students and instructors. We conclude with future research directions to better integrate GenAI with human instruction by reconsidering instructors' roles, especially in providing feedback to create more effective educational experiences.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 104
页数:25
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Arksey H., 2005, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V8, P19, DOI [DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616, 10.1080/1364557032000119616]
[2]   Transforming Education: A Comprehensive Review of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Educational Settings through Bibliometric and Content Analysis [J].
Bahroun, Zied ;
Anane, Chiraz ;
Ahmed, Vian ;
Zacca, Andrew .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (17)
[3]   The effect of short formative diagnostic web quizzes with minimal feedback [J].
Balter, Olle ;
Enstrom, Emma ;
Klingenberg, Bernhard .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2013, 60 (01) :234-242
[4]   Feedback sources in essay writing: peer-generated or AI-generated feedback? [J].
Banihashem, Seyyed Kazem ;
Kerman, Nafiseh Taghizadeh ;
Noroozi, Omid ;
Moon, Jewoong ;
Drachsler, Hendrik .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2024, 21 (01)
[5]   A systematic review of the role of learning analytics in enhancing feedback practices in higher education [J].
Banihashem, Seyyed Kazem ;
Noroozi, Omid ;
van Ginkel, Stan ;
Macfadyen, Leah P. ;
Biemans, Harm J. A. .
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2022, 37
[6]   Mobile learning for science and mathematics school education: A systematic review of empirical evidence [J].
Bano, Muneera ;
Zowghi, Didar ;
Kearney, Matthew ;
Schuck, Sandra ;
Aubusson, Peter .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2018, 121 :30-58
[7]   Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and potentials [J].
Barrot, Jessie S. .
ASSESSING WRITING, 2023, 57
[8]   Students' feedback preferences: how do students react to timely and automatically generated assessment feedback? [J].
Bayerlein, Leopold .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2014, 39 (08) :916-931
[9]   May the Force Be with You JedAI: Balancing the Light and Dark Sides of Generative AI in the Educational Landscape [J].
Bozkurt, Aras ;
Bae, Haesol .
ONLINE LEARNING, 2024, 28 (02)
[10]   The effect of feedback on academic achievement in technology-rich learning environments (TREs): A meta-analytic review [J].
Cai, Zhihui ;
Gui, Yang ;
Mao, Peipei ;
Wang, Zhikeng ;
Hao, Xin ;
Fan, Xitao ;
Tai, Robert H. .
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2023, 39