From Pain Medicine to Pain Surgery: How Our Specialty Lost Its Way

被引:0
作者
Pritzlaff, Scott G. [1 ]
Schatman, Michael E. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Sacramento, CA USA
[2] NYU Grossman Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol Perioperat Care & Pain Med, 550 First Ave, New York, NY 10016 USA
[3] NYU Grossman Sch Med, Dept Populat Hlth, Div Med Eth, New York, NY USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Dr. Steven Richeimer's 2010 editorial, "Are we lemmings going off a cliff? The case against the "interventional" pain medicine label", raised significant concerns regarding the trajectory of pain medicine at that juncture.1 Fourteen years later, we find ourselves in an even more disturbing place. The trend regarding which Dr. Richeimer attempted to warn us - labeling ourselves as "interventional pain specialists" - has spiraled into something even more damaging. He suggested that we strive toward the label of "comprehensive pain physicians", as "interventional pain physicians" relegated physicians who treat pain to mere "technician" status. Recently, we have witnessed trainees, and even some programs, viewing (and labeling) pain medicine as "pain surgery", with the emphasis on procedures at the expense of holistic, patient-centered care resulting in the potential devaluation of the profession. We strongly opine that the rise of social media and the overwhelming emphasis on posting advanced procedure photos from the operating room on social media have skewed perceptions of what actually constitutes "pain medicine". While interventional procedures certainly have their place, the oversaturation of devices, therapies, and industry-backed techniques has created overwhelming "noise". More troubling is the rise of unaccredited fellowships, which resemble interventional radiology training programs with an overarching focus on the "procedural fix". Some of these programs ignore the complexities of pain, including psychosocial and comorbid factors. Training has shifted, and many fellows believe that this unfortunate paradigmatic revision is in the best interest of their patients. This is not the future for which we should be aiming. Dr. Richeimer's point regarding the rise of interventional pain medicine driven by financial considerations and convenience is perhaps even more relevant today than was the case 14 years ago. Over the past two years, we have witnessed a significant decrease in applicants for accredited pain fellowships, with many drawn to high-paying anesthesia patients deserve. sionals place in us.
引用
收藏
页码:3137 / 3138
页数:2
相关论文
共 4 条
[1]  
Christiansen Sandy, 2024, Interv Pain Med, V3, P100404, DOI 10.1016/j.inpm.2024.100404
[2]   Post-Doctoral Training in Pain Medicine: Too Little Yet Not Too Late? [J].
Pritzlaff, Scott G. ;
Day, Miles ;
Wahezi, Sayed E. ;
Schatman, Michael E. .
JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2024, 17 :687-689
[3]   Are We Lemmings Going Off a Cliff? The Case Against the "Interventional" Pain Medicine Label [J].
Richeimer, Steven H. .
PAIN MEDICINE, 2010, 11 (01) :3-5
[4]   Predicting the Collapse of Pain Medicine Using the Economic Recession of 2008 as a Comparator: Lessons Remain Unlearned [J].
Wahezi, Sayed E. ;
Hunter, Corey W. ;
Ahadian, Farshad M. ;
Argoff, Charles E. ;
Schatman, Michael E. .
JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2024, 17 :2341-2344