Computer-Controlled Local Anaesthesia Delivery efficacy - a literature review

被引:3
作者
Janik, Katarzyna [1 ]
Niemczyk, Wojciech [1 ]
Peterek, Robert [1 ]
Roj, Rafal [1 ]
Balicz, Agnieszka [1 ]
Morawiec, Tadeusz [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Silesia, Fac Med Sci Zabrze, Dept Oral Surg, Pl Akad 17, PL-41902 Bytom, Poland
关键词
CCLAD; Local anaesthesia; Pain; TRADITIONAL SYRINGE; PAIN; INJECTION; SYSTEM; WAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.05.012
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Minimising pain with effective local anaesthesia is an essential step towards improving the level of dentally anxious patients' comfort during dental treatment. It can be provided by many different techniques. One of them is using the Computer-Controlled Local Anaesthesia Delivery systems (CCLADs). This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of computerised anaesthesia with the conventional technique in terms of perceived pain. A database literature search was performed on PubMed, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar, covering up the period between 2015 and 2023. Only the studies comparing computerised anaesthesia technique with the use of conventional carpule were included. An overview of 20 relevant studies (n = 1347 subjects) was provided including pediatric patients, as well as the adults. The evaluated parameters were: pain, child's behaviour, heart rate, blood pressure, level of satisfaction, anxiety, further anaesthesia method preference, need for additional anaesthetic, as well as the duration of anaesthesia, measured by different scales, devices and questionnaires. The present literature review led the authors to the conclusion, that the use of CCLADs is significantly less painful than the traditional anaesthesia and it is a promising technique for helping patients deal with pain perception. However, it is advisable to conduct further research on the use of CCLAD.
引用
收藏
页码:1066 / 1071
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Aggarwal Kamal, 2018, J Dent Anesth Pain Med, V18, P367, DOI 10.17245/jdapm.2018.18.6.367
  • [2] Comparative study of conventional anesthesia technique versus computerized system anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial
    Berrendero, S.
    Hriptulova, O.
    Salido, M. P.
    Martinez-Rus, F.
    Pradies, G.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 25 (04) : 2307 - 2315
  • [3] Clark Taylor M, 2010, Dent Clin North Am, V54, P757, DOI 10.1016/j.cden.2010.06.017
  • [4] Pain reduction in lidocaine administration through buffering and warming
    Colaric, KB
    Overton, DT
    Moore, K
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1998, 16 (04) : 353 - 356
  • [5] Dempsy Chengappa M M, 2022, Med J Armed Forces India, V78, pS89, DOI 10.1016/j.mjafi.2020.08.010
  • [6] Metallic syringe versus electronically assisted injection system: a comparative clinical study in children
    El Hachem, C.
    Kaloustian, M. K.
    Cerutti, F.
    Chedid, N. R.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2019, 20 (04) : 320 - 324
  • [7] Patient evaluations after local anesthesia with a computer-assisted method and a conventional syringe before and after reflection time: A prospective randomized controlled trial
    Flisfisch, Sohar
    Woelber, Johan Peter
    Walther, Winfried
    [J]. HELIYON, 2021, 7 (02)
  • [8] Pain Experience and Behavior Management in Pediatric Dentistry: A Comparison between Traditional Local Anesthesia and the Wand Computerized Delivery System
    Garret-Bernardin, Annelyse
    Cantile, Tiziana
    D'Anto, Vincenzo
    Galanakis, Alexandros
    Fauxpoint, Gabriel
    Ferrazzano, Gianmaria Fabrizio
    De Rosa, Sara
    Vallogini, Giulia
    Romeo, Umberto
    Galeotti, Angela
    [J]. PAIN RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT, 2017, 2017
  • [9] Ghaderi F., 2018, SPLIT MOUTH DESIGN S, V19, P57
  • [10] Computer-controlled Intraligamentary local anaesthesia in extraction of mandibular primary molars: randomised controlled clinical trial
    Helmy, Rodaina H.
    Zeitoun, Sarah I.
    El-Habashy, Laila M.
    [J]. BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2022, 22 (01)