Post-Growth Ambitions and Growth-Based Realities in Sustainable Land-Use Planning

被引:1
作者
Lamker, Christian [1 ]
Terfruechte, Thomas [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Fac Spatial Sci, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] TU Dortmund Univ, Dept Spatial Planning, Dortmund, Germany
来源
URBAN PLANNING | 2024年 / 9卷
关键词
land-need-modelling; land consumption; land-use planning; planning instruments; post-growth planning; sustainable land-use; TRANSFORMATION;
D O I
10.17645/up.7881
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
Governments have developed, agreed, and often embraced ambitious targets to meet sustainability and climate change demands. The use of land is foundational for long-term success and one of the most crucial resources where absolute limits of development become tangible. In Europe, success in stopping the expansion of settlement uses through building on natural or agricultural land remains limited in scope and speed. While planning instruments could be open for versatile uses, a pro-growth pathway continues at all planning scales. The premise of this article is that growth fixation is inscribed in planning instruments. We build on post-growth planning literature to conceptualize the relevance of (post-)growth for land-use planning. Two examples of planning instruments (modelling regional land use needs, density concepts) and their application in German case studies illustrate wherein growth has been locked and within which potentials for change lie. We investigate inscribed premises of the causal relation between population and household growth to land consumption that are leading to a divergence between the need for land and the provision of land. By doing so, we position post-growth planning to understand contemporary challenges in reducing the net consumption of land, and as a crucial body of thought that better accounts for the tangible limits of available land.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Adrian L., 2018, Instrumente zur Reduzierung der Flacheninanspruchnahme: Aktionsplan Flachensparen (Texte 38/2018)
  • [2] Akademie fur Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft, 2021, Positionspapier aus der ARL, V121
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2022, Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change Working Group II Contribution to the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report
  • [4] Barry J, 2020, ROUTL COMPANIONS, P120
  • [5] Bezirksregierung Detmold, 2023, Regionalplan OWL: Fur den Planungsraum Ostwestfalen-Lippe-Entwurf 2023
  • [6] Bezirksregierung Koln, 2021, Begrundung zur Neuaufstellung des Regionalplans Koln-Entwurf 2021
  • [7] Bues A., 2023, Zukunftsfahiges Umweltrecht II: Suffizienz im Recht, P65, DOI [10.5771/9783748915379-65, DOI 10.5771/9783748915379]
  • [8] Bundesregierung, 2018, Deutsche Nachhaltigkeitsstrategie: Aktualisierung 2018
  • [9] Bundesrepublik Deutschland, 2008, Raumordnungsgesetz (ROG). Federal Spatial Planning Act of 22 December 2008
  • [10] Dixson-Decleve Sandrine., 2022, Earth for All: A Survival Guide for Humanity