Opioid Protective Behavioral Strategies Scale (OPBSS): Development and Psychometric Evaluation

被引:0
作者
Hurlocker, Margo C. [1 ]
Pearson, Matthew R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New Mexico, Ctr Alcohol Subst Use & Addict, 2650 Yale Blvd Southeast,MSC11 6280, Albuquerque, NM 87106 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
opioids; harm reduction; protective behavioral strategies; psychometrics; USE DISORDER;
D O I
10.1037/pha0000738
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Protective behavioral strategies (PBS) are behaviors that individuals use to mitigate harm related to risky behaviors. Though measures have been validated to assess alcohol- and cannabis-specific PBS use, an opioid-specific PBS measure has yet to be validated. The present study developed and validated a tool to assess the extent of PBS employed by individuals who use licit and/or illicit opioids. We recruited a community sample of adults who endorsed past-month opioid use (n = 345) via online platforms to complete a baseline survey, and 277 participants (80.2%) also completed the 1-month follow-up survey. From PBS measures of other substances, harm reduction strategies found in the literature, and expert feedback, we developed the 60-item Opioid Protective Behavioral Strategies Scale (OPBSS). We removed 14 items based on item and exploratory factor analyses, resulting in 46 retained items. A two-factor solution was supported: strategies focused on managing opioid use (Controlled Opioid Use) and preventing opioid-related harm (Serious Harm Reduction). The OPBSS subscales demonstrated high internal consistencies, fair-to-excellent test-retest reliability, significant positive associations with PBS measures for other substances, and robust associations with risky opioid use and opioid-related negative consequences, both concurrently and prospectively when controlling for other opioid characteristics. The 46-item OPBSS has promising psychometric properties. Importantly, more opioid PBS predicted less risky opioid use and related consequences, suggesting that opioid PBS may be a beneficial opioid prevention effort. However, additional psychometric work is needed to determine which PBS are most suitable for populations with distinct opioid use patterns.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 108
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2021, Prescription opioids DrugFacts
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2017, Mplus user's guide: Statistical analysis with latent variables, user's guide
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2023, Drug overdose death rates
  • [4] Journal Article Reporting Standards for Quantitative Research in Psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board Task Force Report
    Appelbaum, Mark
    Cooper, Harris
    Kline, Rex B.
    Mayo-Wilson, Evan
    Nezu, Arthur M.
    Rao, Stephen M.
    [J]. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2018, 73 (01) : 3 - 25
  • [5] Opioid use disorder in the United States: Insurance status and treatment access
    Becker, William C.
    Fiellin, David A.
    Merrill, Joseph O.
    Schulman, Beryl
    Finkelstein, Ruth
    Olsen, Yngvild
    Busch, Susan H.
    [J]. DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2008, 94 (1-3) : 207 - 213
  • [6] Opioid use and misuse: health impact, prevalence, correlates and interventions
    Bolshakova, Maria
    Bluthenthal, Ricky
    Sussman, Steve
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2019, 34 (09) : 1105 - 1139
  • [7] Cicchetti DV, 1994, Psychological Assessment, V6, P284, DOI [DOI 10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284, 10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284]
  • [8] A Systematic Review of Community Opioid Overdose Prevention and Naloxone Distribution Programs
    Clark, Angela K.
    Wilder, Christine M.
    Winstanley, Erin L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADDICTION MEDICINE, 2014, 8 (03) : 153 - 163
  • [9] A study of the relationship between protective behaviors and drinking consequences among undergraduate college students
    Delva, J
    Smith, MP
    Howell, RL
    Harrison, DF
    Wilke, D
    Jackson, DL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AMERICAN COLLEGE HEALTH, 2004, 53 (01) : 19 - 26
  • [10] Exploring the Sensitivity of Horn's Parallel Analysis to the Distributional Form of Random Data
    Dinno, Alexis
    [J]. MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2009, 44 (03) : 362 - 388