Project risk management in practice: the actuality of project risk management in organizations

被引:1
作者
Willumsen, Pelle Lundquist [1 ,2 ]
Oehmen, Josef [1 ]
Selim, Hani Mike Rae [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, DTU Construct, Lyngby, Denmark
[2] Implement Consulting Grp, Hellerup, Denmark
关键词
Project risk management; Risk management; Actuality; Practice research; Engineering projects; MANAGING RISKS; PERFORMANCE; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.1108/IJMPB-09-2023-0214
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
PurposeThis paper explores how risks are managed in project practice beyond formalized risk management processes by applying the lens of actuality research to project risk management.Design/methodology/approachThe paper follows a qualitative multimethod research approach utilizing literature review, interviews, observations and document analysis. The paper is based on three case studies and one interview study in project organizations facing green transition challenges.FindingsLittle work exists to reveal how risk management is actually done by project practitioners, and why. Few studies report on contextual variation and consider confounding factors beyond a "one size fits all" formalized explicit risk management process, despite ample evidence that risks are managed outside the formal process. The study documents that informal and/or implicit risk management activities add significantly more value.Originality/valueThe paper contributes a literature review of research into the actuality of project risk management, a sense-making framework of how risks are managed in practice beyond the formal, explicit risk-management process by including informal and/or implicit risk management activities, an empirical study of risk-management practice highlighting that informal and/or implicit risk-management activities dominate in practice, a discussion of why risks are managed outside formalized, explicit process and a research agenda to enable the design of impactful project risk-management practices.
引用
收藏
页码:593 / 617
页数:25
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   Researching complex projects: Using causal mapping to take a systems perspective [J].
Ackermann, Fran ;
Alexander, James .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2016, 34 (06) :891-901
[2]   An analysis of risk sharing in strategic R&D and new product development projects [J].
Adler, Terry R. ;
Pittz, Thomas G. ;
Meredith, Jack .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2016, 34 (06) :914-922
[3]   A process framework for theoretically grounded prescriptive research in the project management field [J].
Ahlemann, Frederik ;
El Arbi, Fedi ;
Kaiser, Michael G. ;
Heck, Axel .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2013, 31 (01) :43-56
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2019, The Standard for Risk Management in Portfolios, Programs, and Projects
[5]   Some foundational issues related to risk governance and different types of risks [J].
Aven, Terje ;
Renn, Ortwin .
JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2020, 23 (09) :1121-1134
[6]   Risk and risk management in software projects: A reassessment [J].
Bannerman, Paul L. .
JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2008, 81 (12) :2118-2133
[7]  
Bernstein PeterL., 1998, Against the Gods. The Remarkable Story of Risk
[8]   The paradox of risk management; a project management practice perspective [J].
Besner, Claude ;
Hobbs, Brian .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGING PROJECTS IN BUSINESS, 2012, 5 (02) :230-247
[9]   Identifying Subjective Perspectives on Managing Underground Risks at Schiphol Airport [J].
Biersteker, Erwin ;
van Marrewijk, Alfons ;
Koppenjan, Joop .
PROJECT MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2022, 53 (02) :181-195
[10]   Exploring pattern of complexity in mega construction projects [J].
Bilgin, Gizem ;
Erol, Huseyin ;
Atasoy, Guzide ;
Dikmen, Irem ;
Birgonul, M. Talat .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGING PROJECTS IN BUSINESS, 2022, 15 (07) :1064-1090