Predicting Visual Acuity Responses to Anti-VEGF Treatment in the Comparison of Age-related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials Using Machine Learning

被引:2
|
作者
Chandra, Rajat S. [1 ]
Ying, Gui-shuang [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Ctr Prevent Ophthalmol & Biostat, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, 3711 Market St,Suite 801, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
来源
OPHTHALMOLOGY RETINA | 2024年 / 8卷 / 05期
关键词
Age-related macular degeneration; Anti-VEGF therapy; Machine learning; Prediction; RANIBIZUMAB; OUTCOMES; BEVACIZUMAB; IMPAIRMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.oret.2023.11.010
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate multiple machine learning (ML) models for predicting 2-year visual acuity (VA) responses to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment in the Comparison of Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD) Treatments Trials (CATT) for patients with neovascular AMD (nAMD). Design: Secondary analysis of public data from a randomized clinical trial. Participants: A total of 1029 CATT participants who completed 2 years of follow-up with untreated active nAMD and baseline VA between 20/25 and 20/320 in the study eye. perceptron neural network, and lasso) were applied to clinical and image data from baseline and weeks 4, 8, and 12 for predicting 4 VA outcomes (>= 15-letter VA gain, >= 15-letter VA loss, VA change from baseline, and actual VA) at 2 years. The CATT data from 1029 participants were randomly split for training (n = 717), from which the models were trained using 10-fold cross-validation, and for final validation on a test data set (n = 312). Main Outcome Measures: Performances of ML models were assessed by R2 and mean absolute error (MAE) for predicting VA change from baseline and actual VA at 2 years, by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for predicting >= 15-letter VA gain and loss from baseline. Results: Using training data up to week 12, the ML models from cross-validation achieved mean R2 of 0.24 to 0.29 (MAE = 9.1-9.8 letters) for predicting VA change and 0.37 to 0.41 (MAE = 9.3-10.2 letters) for predicting actual VA at 2 years. The mean AUCs for predicting >= 15-letter VA gain and loss at 2 years was 0.84 to 0.85 and 0.58 to 0.73, respectively. In final validation on the test data set up to week 12, the models had an R2 of 0.33 to 0.38 (MAE = 8.9-9.9 letters) for predicting VA change, an R2 of 0.37 to 0.45 (MAE = 8.8-10.2 letters) for predicting actual VA at 2 years, and AUCs of 0.85 to 0.87 and 0.67 to 0.79 for predicting >= 15-letter VA gain and loss, respectively. Conclusions: Machine learning models have the potential to predict 2-year VA response to anti-VEGF treatment using clinical and imaging features from the loading dose phase, which can aid in decision-making around treatment protocols for patients with nAMD. Financial Disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article. Ophthalmology Retina 2024;8:419-430 (c) 2023 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 430
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Visual acuity outcomes of anti-VEGF treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration in clinical trials
    Yamashiro, Kenji
    Oishi, Akio
    Hata, Masayuki
    Takahashi, Ayako
    Tsujikawa, Akitaka
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 65 (06) : 741 - 760
  • [2] Visual acuity outcomes of anti-VEGF treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration in clinical trials
    Kenji Yamashiro
    Akio Oishi
    Masayuki Hata
    Ayako Takahashi
    Akitaka Tsujikawa
    Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, 2021, 65 : 741 - 760
  • [3] Macular Morphology and Visual Acuity in the Comparison of Age-related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials
    Jaffe, Glenn J.
    Martin, Daniel F.
    Toth, Cynthia A.
    Daniel, Ebenezer
    Maguire, Maureen G.
    Ying, Gui-Shuang
    Grunwald, Juan E.
    Huang, Jiayan
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 120 (09) : 1860 - 1870
  • [4] Visual acuity and progression of macular atrophy in patients receiving intravitreal anti-VEGF for age-related macular degeneration
    Ji, Marco H.
    Callaway, Natalia F.
    Ludwig, Cassie A.
    Vail, Daniel
    Al-Moujahed, Ahmad
    Rosenblatt, Tatiana R.
    Leng, Theodore
    Sanislo, Steven R.
    Moshfeghi, Darius M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 32 (01) : 429 - 435
  • [5] Anti-VEGF therapies for the treatment of age-related macular degeneration
    Gower, Emily W.
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2012, 1 (06) : 485 - 488
  • [6] Sporadic Visual Acuity Loss in the Comparison of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials (CATT)
    Kim, Benjamin J.
    Ying, Gui-Shuang
    Huang, Jiayan
    Levy, Nicole E.
    Maguire, Maureen G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 158 (01) : 128 - 135
  • [7] Sustained Visual Acuity Loss in the Comparison of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials
    Ying, Gui-shuang
    Kim, Benjamin J.
    Maguire, Maureen G.
    Huang, Jiayan
    Daniel, Ebenezer
    Jaffe, Glenn J.
    Grunwald, Juan E.
    Blinder, Kevin J.
    Flaxel, Christina J.
    Rahhal, Firas
    Regillo, Carl
    Martin, Daniel F.
    JAMA OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 132 (08) : 915 - 921
  • [8] Predicting Visual Acuity by Using Machine Learning in Patients Treated for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
    Rohm, Markus
    Tresp, Volker
    Mueller, Michael
    Kern, Christoph
    Manakov, Ilja
    Weiss, Maximilian
    Sim, Dawn A.
    Priglinger, Siegfried
    Keane, Pearse A.
    Kortuem, Karsten
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 125 (07) : 1028 - 1036
  • [9] Predictive Biomarkers of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Response to Anti-VEGF Treatment
    Oca, Ana I.
    Perez-Sala, Alvaro
    Pariente, Ana
    Ochoa, Rodrigo
    Velilla, Sara
    Pelaez, Rafael
    Larrayoz, Ignacio M.
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2021, 11 (12):
  • [10] Correlation of Baseline Visual Acuity with Outcomes of Treatment with Anti-VEGF in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
    Veluswamy, Balaji
    Lee, Andy
    Mirza, Rukhsana G.
    Gill, Manjot K.
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 14 : 1565 - 1572