Sugemalimab combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis

被引:0
作者
Cai, Hongfu [1 ]
Fang, Ling [2 ]
Zheng, Zhiwei [2 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Med Univ, Union Hosp, Dept Pharm, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Shantou Univ, Canc Hosp, Med Coll, Dept Pharm, Shantou, Peoples R China
关键词
esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; sugemalimab; chemotherapy; cost-effectiveness; partitioned survival approach model; CANCER;
D O I
10.3389/fphar.2024.1396761
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background This study aims to systematically analyze the cost-effectiveness of the combination therapy comprising sugemalimab and chemotherapy in the management of advanced ESCC from the Chinese healthcare system perspective.Methods An advanced ESCC patient simulation partitioned survival approach model was developed to mimic the disease progression of patients undergoing treatment with sugemalimab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone. To ensure accuracy and precision, clinical data, treatment costs, and utility values were collected from comprehensive clinical trials and reliable economic databases. The cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted by assessing the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio in relation to the established willingness-to-pay threshold. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the model.Results The cumulative expenditure for the group of patients administered with sugemalimab amounted to US$ 41734.87, whereas the placebo group was associated with a total cost of US$ 22926.25. By evaluating the ICER, which quantifies the additional cost incurred per QALY gained, a value of US$ 61066.96 per QALY was determined. It is imperative to note that this ICER value surpasses the predetermined threshold for WTP in China, set at US$ 39,855.79 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the results were sensitive to the cost of sugemalimab, progression-free survival, and utility values. These fluctuations did not result in a reversal of the study findings.Conclusion The combination of sugemalimab with chemotherapy for the treatment of ESCC in China is currently not considered a cost-effective therapeutic approach. However, it is suggested that additional reductions in price may facilitate the potential for achieving cost-effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [31] First-Line Tislelizumab for Advanced or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma:A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
    Zheng, Zhiwei
    Chen, Hongcai
    Cai, Hongfu
    Zhu, Huide
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2024, 24 (03) : 397 - 404
  • [32] Cost-effectiveness analysis of serplulimab as first-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
    Zheng, Zhiwei
    Fang, Ling
    Cai, Hongfu
    Zhu, Huide
    [J]. IMMUNOTHERAPY, 2023, 15 (13) : 1045 - 1055
  • [33] Economic evaluation of toripalimab plus chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in China
    Zheng, Zhiwei
    Fang, Ling
    Cai, Hongfu
    Zhu, Huide
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2023, 23 (06) : 683 - 690
  • [34] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy vs. Chemotherapy Alone as First-Line Treatment in Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and PD-L1 CPS of 10 or More
    Zheng, Zhiwei
    Lin, Jingrong
    Zhu, Huide
    Cai, Hongfu
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [35] Esophageal cancer in China: Practice and research in the new era
    Zhu, Hongcheng
    Ma, Xiao
    Ye, Ting
    Wang, Honggang
    Wang, Zezhou
    Liu, Qi
    Zhao, Kuaile
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2023, 152 (09) : 1741 - 1751