Two-year post-treatment outcomes following peanut oral immunotherapy in the Probiotic and Peanut Oral Immunotherapy-003 Long-Term (PPOIT-003LT) study

被引:0
|
作者
Loke, Paxton [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Xiaofang [1 ]
Lloyd, Melanie [1 ,4 ]
Ashley, Sarah E. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Lozinsky, Adriana C. [1 ]
Gold, Michael [6 ,7 ]
O'Sullivan, Michael D. [8 ,9 ,10 ]
Quinn, Patrick [6 ,7 ]
Robinson, Marnie [1 ,5 ]
Galvin, Audrey Dunn [11 ,12 ]
Orsini, Francesca [1 ]
Tang, Mimi L. K. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Murdoch Childrens Res Inst, 50 Flemington Rd, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Dept Paediat, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[3] Monash Childrens Hosp, Monash Hlth, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[4] Monash Univ, Ctr Med Use & Safety, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[5] Royal Childrens Hosp, Dept Allergy & Immunol, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[6] Univ Adelaide, Adelaide Med Sch, Dept Paediat, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[7] Womens & Childrens Hosp Adelaide, North Adelaide, SA, Australia
[8] Perth Childrens Hosp, Immunol Dept, Child & Adolescent Hlth Serv, Nedlands, WA, Australia
[9] Univ Western Australia, Med Sch, Discipline Paediat, Perth, WA, Australia
[10] Telethon Kids Inst, Nedlands, WA, Australia
[11] Univ Coll Cork, Sch Appl Psychol, Cork Univ Hosp, Cork, Ireland
[12] Allergy Res Network, Cork, Ireland
关键词
desensitization; health-related quality of life; oral immunotherapy; peanut allergy; peanut oral immunotherapy; probiotic; remission; sustained unresponsiveness; ADVERSE FOOD REACTIONS; ALLERGY; CHILDREN; ANAPHYLAXIS; PREVALENCE; CHILDHOOD; QUESTIONNAIRE;
D O I
10.1111/all.16262
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Few studies have examined long-term outcomes following oral immunotherapy (OIT); none have examined long-term risks and benefits associated with distinct clinical outcomes (desensitization, remission). Methods: Participants completing the probiotic and peanut oral immunotherapy (PPOIT) -003 randomized trial were enrolled in a follow-on study, PPOIT-003LT. Peanut ingestion, reactions, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) were monitored prospectively. Outcomes at 1-year and 2-years post-treatment were examined by treatment group and by post-OIT clinical outcome (remission, desensitization without remission [DWR], allergic). Results: 86% (151/176) of eligible children enrolled. Post-treatment peanut ingestion at 2-years post-treatment were similar for PPOIT (86.7%) and OIT (78.7%) groups, both higher than placebo (10.3%). Reactions reduced over time for all treatment and clinical outcome groups (PPOIT 31.7% to 23.3%, OIT 37.7% to 19.7%, placebo 13.8% to 6.9%; remission 27.5% to 15.9%; DWR 57.9% to 36.8%; allergic 11.6% to 7%). At 2-years post-treatment, similar proportions of remission and allergic participants reported reactions (RD 0.09 (95%CI -0.03, 0.20), p = .127), whereas more DWR participants reported reactions than remission (remission vs DWR: RD -0.21 (95%CI -0.39; -0.03), p = .02) and allergic (DWR vs allergic: RD 0.30 (95%CI 0.13, 0.47), p = .001) participants. At 2-years post-treatment, 0% remission versus 5.3% DWR versus 2.3% allergic participants reported adrenaline injector usage. Remission participants had significantly greater HRQOL improvement (adjusted for baseline) compared with both DWR (MD -0.54 (95%CI -0.99, -0.10), p = .017) and allergic (MD -0.82 (95%CI -1.25, -0.38), p < .001). Conclusion: By 2-years post-treatment, remission participants reported fewer reactions, less severe reactions and greater HRQOL improvement compared with DWR and allergic participants, indicating that remission is the patient-preferred treatment outcome over desensitization or remaining allergic.
引用
收藏
页码:2759 / 2774
页数:16
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Probiotic peanut oral immunotherapy versus oral immunotherapy and placebo in children with peanut allergy in Australia (PPOIT-003): a multicentre, randomised, phase 2b trial
    Loke, Paxton
    Orsini, Francesca
    Lozinsky, Adriana C.
    Gold, Michael
    O'Sullivan, Michael D.
    Quinn, Patrick
    Lloyd, Melanie
    Ashley, Sarah E.
    Pitkin, Sigrid
    Axelrad, Christine
    Metcalfe, Jessica R.
    Su, Ee Lyn
    Tey, Dean
    Robinson, Marnie N.
    Allen, Katrina J.
    Prescott, Susan L.
    Galvin, Audrey Dunn
    Tang, Mimi L. K.
    LANCET CHILD & ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2022, 6 (03) : 171 - 184
  • [2] Study protocol of a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of probiotic and peanut oral immunotherapy (PPOIT) in inducing desensitisation or tolerance in children with peanut allergy compared with oral immunotherapy (OIT) alone and with placebo (the PPOIT-003 study)
    Chebar Lozinsky, Adriana
    Loke, Paxton
    Orsini, Francesca
    O'Sullivan, Michael
    L. Prescott, Susan
    Gold, Michael S.
    Quinn, Patrick
    DunnGalvin, Audrey
    LK Tang, Mimi
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (09):
  • [3] Probiotic peanut oral immunotherapy is associated with long-term persistence of 8-week sustained unresponsiveness and long-lasting quality-of-life improvement
    Loke, Paxton
    Hsiao, Kuang-Chih
    Lozinsky, Adriana Chebar
    Ashley, Sarah E.
    Lloyd, Melanie
    Pitkin, Sigrid
    Axelrad, Christine Jean
    Jayawardana, Kaushala S.
    Tey, Dean
    Su, Ee Lyn
    Robinson, Marnie
    Leung, Agnes S. Y.
    Dunn Galvin, Audrey
    Tang, Mimi L. K.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2022, 52 (06) : 806 - 811
  • [4] Long-term clinical and immunological effects of probiotic and peanut oral immunotherapy after treatment cessation: 4-year follow-up of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Hsiao, Kuang-Chih
    Ponsonby, Anne-Louise
    Axelrad, Christine
    Pitkin, Sigrid
    Tang, Mimi L. K.
    LANCET CHILD & ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2017, 1 (02) : 97 - 105