From design to implementation: Lessons from planning the first marine protected area network in Canada

被引:0
|
作者
Beaty, Fiona [1 ]
Brown, Kil Hltaanuwaay Tayler [2 ]
Braun, Julien [2 ]
Diggon, Steve [1 ]
Hartley, Emery [3 ]
Heidt, Aaron [1 ]
Maddin, Heather [3 ]
Maloney, Avery [1 ]
Martone, Rebecca [4 ]
Mcdougall, Chris [5 ]
Reid, Mike [6 ,7 ]
Robb, Carrie [7 ]
Rubidge, Emily [7 ]
Short, Charles
Worsley, Kristin
机构
[1] Coastal First Nations Great Bear Initiat, 409 Granville St Su 1660, Vancouver, BC V6C 1T2, Canada
[2] Council Haida Nation, POB 87, Massett, BC V0T 1M0, Canada
[3] BC Minist Water Land & Resource Stewardship, Victoria, BC V8W 9C3, Canada
[4] Tula Fdn, Ocean Decade Collaborat Ctr NE Pacific, POB 25039, Campbell River, BC V9W 0B7, Canada
[5] Pk Canada, 711 Broughton St, Victoria, BC V8W 1E2, Canada
[6] Heiltsuk Integrated Resource Management Dept, Hailzaqv Nation, Waglisla, BC, Canada
[7] Fisheries & Oceans Canada, 3190 Hammond Bay Rd, Nanaimo, BC V9T 6N7, Canada
关键词
Marine protected areas; MPA Network; Co-governance; Multiple ways of knowing; Conservation planning; Marine spatial planning; OUTCOMES; RESERVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106360
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The social-ecological outcomes of marine protected areas (MPAs) can be amplified when sites are designed in networks that function cooperatively and synergistically. From 2015-2024, seventeen First Nations, the Province of British Columbia, and the Government of Canada collaboratively developed a Network Action Plan to establish an MPA Network for the Northern Shelf Bioregion (NSB). The NSB is a diverse and complex social-ecological region in British Columbia that spans an area of 102,000 km(2) from Northern Vancouver Island to the Alaska border. Here, we describe the MPA Network planning process and the transition from Network planning to implementation. We discuss key elements of success that enabled the Network Action Plan's collaborative development and lessons learned to inform and improve regional MPA Network implementation and global MPA Network planning and implementation. All phases of the planning process, including governance, development, engagement, design, and analysis, were guided by the following principles: collaborative governance, multiple ways of knowing, participatory engagement, and adaptation to new information. The Network Action Plan's dynamic design process resulted in innovative approaches and tools to protect conservation objectives throughout the NSB. As the NSB MPA Network process transitions from planning toward implementation, collaborative governance, network monitoring, and ongoing participatory engagement processes will play a central role in advancing the goals and objectives articulated in the Network Action Plan and ensuring equitable social-ecological outcomes. Overall, the NSB MPA Network planning process provides a model for collaborative design of MPA Networks and can inform co-governance and co-management processes throughout the world.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Drivers of redistribution of fishing and non-fishing effort after the implementation of a marine protected area network
    Cabral, Reniel B.
    Gaines, Steven D.
    Johnson, Brett A.
    Bell, Tom W.
    White, Crow
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2017, 27 (02) : 416 - 428
  • [42] Local participation and large marine protected areas: Lessons from a US Marine National Monument
    Richmond, Laurie
    Gruby, Rebecca L.
    Kotowicz, Dawn
    Dumouchel, Robert
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 252
  • [43] Incorporating the spatial access priorities of fishers into strategic conservation planning and marine protected area design: reducing cost and increasing transparency
    Yates, K. L.
    Schoeman, D. S.
    ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2015, 72 (02) : 587 - 594
  • [44] From stormy seas to the doldrums: The challenges of navigating towards an ecologically coherent marine protected area network through England's Marine Conservation Zone process
    Lieberknecht, Louise M.
    Jones, Peter J. S.
    MARINE POLICY, 2016, 71 : 275 - 284
  • [45] Shortfalls in the global protected area network at representing marine biodiversity
    Klein, Carissa J.
    Brown, Christopher J.
    Halpern, Benjamin S.
    Segan, Daniel B.
    McGowan, Jennifer
    Beger, Maria
    Watson, James E. M.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2015, 5
  • [46] When is a marine protected area network ecologically coherent? A case study from the North-east Atlantic
    Johnson, David
    Ardron, Jeff
    Billett, David
    Hooper, Tom
    Mullier, Tom
    Chaniotis, Peter
    Ponge, Benjamin
    Corcoran, Emily
    AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2014, 24 : 44 - 58
  • [47] Sustainable financing of a national Marine Protected Area network in Fiji
    Ison, Sierra
    Hills, Jeremy
    Morris, Cherie
    Stead, Selina M.
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 163 : 352 - 363
  • [48] Developing a marine protected area network with multiple objectives in China
    Li, Yunzhou
    Zhang, Chongliang
    Xue, Ying
    Xu, Binduo
    Sun, Ming
    Ren, Yiping
    Chen, Yong
    AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2019, 29 (06) : 952 - 963
  • [49] Soft-bottom fishes and spatial protection: findings from a temperate marine protected area
    Sousa, Ines
    Goncalves, Jorge M. S.
    Claudet, Joachim
    Coelho, Rui
    Goncalves, Emanuel J.
    Erzini, Karim
    PEERJ, 2018, 6
  • [50] Deriving Lessons Relating to Marine Spatial Planning from Canada's Eastern Scotian Shelf Integrated Management Initiative
    Flannery, Wesley
    Cinneide, Micheal O.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY & PLANNING, 2012, 14 (01) : 97 - 117