From design to implementation: Lessons from planning the first marine protected area network in Canada

被引:0
|
作者
Beaty, Fiona [1 ]
Brown, Kil Hltaanuwaay Tayler [2 ]
Braun, Julien [2 ]
Diggon, Steve [1 ]
Hartley, Emery [3 ]
Heidt, Aaron [1 ]
Maddin, Heather [3 ]
Maloney, Avery [1 ]
Martone, Rebecca [4 ]
Mcdougall, Chris [5 ]
Reid, Mike [6 ,7 ]
Robb, Carrie [7 ]
Rubidge, Emily [7 ]
Short, Charles
Worsley, Kristin
机构
[1] Coastal First Nations Great Bear Initiat, 409 Granville St Su 1660, Vancouver, BC V6C 1T2, Canada
[2] Council Haida Nation, POB 87, Massett, BC V0T 1M0, Canada
[3] BC Minist Water Land & Resource Stewardship, Victoria, BC V8W 9C3, Canada
[4] Tula Fdn, Ocean Decade Collaborat Ctr NE Pacific, POB 25039, Campbell River, BC V9W 0B7, Canada
[5] Pk Canada, 711 Broughton St, Victoria, BC V8W 1E2, Canada
[6] Heiltsuk Integrated Resource Management Dept, Hailzaqv Nation, Waglisla, BC, Canada
[7] Fisheries & Oceans Canada, 3190 Hammond Bay Rd, Nanaimo, BC V9T 6N7, Canada
关键词
Marine protected areas; MPA Network; Co-governance; Multiple ways of knowing; Conservation planning; Marine spatial planning; OUTCOMES; RESERVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106360
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The social-ecological outcomes of marine protected areas (MPAs) can be amplified when sites are designed in networks that function cooperatively and synergistically. From 2015-2024, seventeen First Nations, the Province of British Columbia, and the Government of Canada collaboratively developed a Network Action Plan to establish an MPA Network for the Northern Shelf Bioregion (NSB). The NSB is a diverse and complex social-ecological region in British Columbia that spans an area of 102,000 km(2) from Northern Vancouver Island to the Alaska border. Here, we describe the MPA Network planning process and the transition from Network planning to implementation. We discuss key elements of success that enabled the Network Action Plan's collaborative development and lessons learned to inform and improve regional MPA Network implementation and global MPA Network planning and implementation. All phases of the planning process, including governance, development, engagement, design, and analysis, were guided by the following principles: collaborative governance, multiple ways of knowing, participatory engagement, and adaptation to new information. The Network Action Plan's dynamic design process resulted in innovative approaches and tools to protect conservation objectives throughout the NSB. As the NSB MPA Network process transitions from planning toward implementation, collaborative governance, network monitoring, and ongoing participatory engagement processes will play a central role in advancing the goals and objectives articulated in the Network Action Plan and ensuring equitable social-ecological outcomes. Overall, the NSB MPA Network planning process provides a model for collaborative design of MPA Networks and can inform co-governance and co-management processes throughout the world.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Fishers' Behaviour in Response to the Implementation of a Marine Protected Area
    Horta e Costa, Barbara
    Batista, Marisa I.
    Goncalves, Leonel
    Erzini, Karim
    Caselle, Jennifer E.
    Cabral, Henrique N.
    Goncalves, Emanuel J.
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (06):
  • [22] Incorporating Recreational Users into Marine Protected Area Planning: A Study of Recreational Boating in British Columbia, Canada
    Darcy L. Gray
    Rosaline Canessa
    Rick Rollins
    C. Peter Keller
    Philip Dearden
    Environmental Management, 2010, 46 : 167 - 180
  • [23] Applying empirical estimates of marine protected area effectiveness to assess conservation plans in British Columbia, Canada
    Ban, Natalie C.
    McDougall, Chris
    Beck, Martina
    Salomon, Anne K.
    Cripps, Ken
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2014, 180 : 134 - 148
  • [24] Economics of Marine Protected Areas: Assessing the Literature for Marine Protected Area Network Expansions
    Albers, Heidi J.
    Ashworth, Madison F.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2022, 14 : 533 - 554
  • [25] Rigor and representativeness in marine protected area design
    Stevens, T
    COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2002, 30 (03) : 237 - 248
  • [26] Exploring dual discount rates for ecosystem services: Evidence from a marine protected area network
    Vasquez-Lavin, Felipe
    Ponce Oliva, Roberto D.
    Ignacio Hernandez, Jose
    Gelcich, Stefan
    Carrasco, Moises
    Quiroga, Miguel
    RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2019, 55 : 63 - 80
  • [27] Marine Protected Area Management Effectiveness: Progress and Lessons in the Philippines
    Maypa, Aileen P.
    White, Alan T.
    Canares, Elline
    Martinez, Raffy
    Eisma-Osorio, Rose Liza
    Alino, Porfirio
    Apistar, Dean
    COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2012, 40 (05) : 510 - 524
  • [28] Recreational benefits from a marine protected area: A travel cost analysis of Lundy
    Chae, Dong-Ryul
    Wattage, Premachandra
    Pascoe, Sean
    TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2012, 33 (04) : 971 - 977
  • [29] A comparison of zoning analyses to inform the planning of a marine protected area network in Raja Ampat, Indonesia
    Grantham, Hedley S.
    Agostini, Vera N.
    Wilson, Joanne
    Mangubhai, Sangeeta
    Hidayat, Nur
    Muljadi, Andreas
    Muhajir
    Rotinsulu, Chris
    Mongdong, Meity
    Beck, Michael W.
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    MARINE POLICY, 2013, 38 : 184 - 194
  • [30] Integrating distribution models and habitat classification maps into marine protected area planning
    Ferrari, Renata
    Malcolm, Hamish
    Neilson, Joe
    Lucieer, Vanessa
    Jordan, Alan
    Ingleton, Tim
    Figueira, Will
    Johnstone, Nicola
    Hill, Nicole
    ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE, 2018, 212 : 40 - 50