Comprehensive Evaluation of Serpentine Aneurysms: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis with a Subanalysis for Treatment Approaches

PurposeThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to systematically evaluate and enhance the understanding of optimal management strategies for serpentine aneurysms.MethodsA systematic search was conducted in Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane databases up to July 8, 2024, using relevant keywords. Studies included were case series, prospective or retrospective cohorts, or randomized controlled trials with data on clinical and angiographic outcomes of intracranial serpentine aneurysms. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two authors. Statistical analysis was conducted using R, with pooled estimates under a random-effects model.ResultsTen studies comprising 70 patients with 71 serpentine aneurysms were included. The majority (92.9%) were giant aneurysms. The overall rate of procedure-related complications was 33%, morbidity was 13%, and mortality was 13%. Good neurological outcomes were achieved in 76% of cases. For unruptured aneurysms, the complication rate was 34%, while no complications were observed in ruptured aneurysms. Comparative analysis between ruptured and unruptured aneurysms showed no significant differences in outcomes or complications. The technical success rate was 91%. Reconstructive methods showed a slightly higher rate of good neurological outcomes (77%) compared to deconstructive methods (70%), though complication rates were similar.ConclusionBoth reconstructive and deconstructive endovascular treatments for serpentine aneurysms are effective, with high rates of good neurological outcomes and acceptable complication rates.