Patient-Oriented Questionnaires and Machine Learning for Rare Disease Diagnosis: A Systematic Review

Background: A major challenge faced by patients with rare diseases (RDs) often stems from delays in diagnosis, typically due to nonspecific clinical symptoms or doctors' limited experience in connecting symptoms to the underlying RD. Using patient-oriented questionnaires (POQs) as a data source for machine learning (ML) techniques can serve as a potential solution. These questionnaires enable patients to portray their day-to-day experiences living with their condition, irrespective of clinical symptoms. This systematic review-registered at PROSPERO with the Registration-ID: CRD42023490838-aims to present the current state of research in this domain by conducting a systematic literature search and identifying the potentials and limitations of this methodology. Methods: The review adheres to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and was primarily funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research under grant no. 16DHBKI056 (ki4all). The methodology involved a systematic search across the databases PubMed, Semantic Scholar and Google Scholar, covering articles published until June 2023. The inclusion criteria encompass examining the use of POQs in diagnosing rare and common diseases. Additionally, studies that focused on applying ML techniques to the resulting datasets were considered for inclusion. The primary objective was to include English as well as German research that involved the generation of predictions regarding the underlying disease based on the information gathered from POQs. Furthermore, studies exploring identifying predictive indicators associated with the underlying disease were also included in the literature review. The following data were extracted from the selected studies: year of publication, number of questions in the POQs, answer scale in the questionnaires, the ML algorithms used, the input data for the ML algorithms, the performance of these algorithms and how the performance was measured. In addition, information on the development of the questionnaires was recorded. Results: This search retrieved 421 results in total. After one superficial and two comprehensive screening runs performed by two authors independently, we ended up with 26 studies for further consideration. Sixteen of these studies deal with diseases and ML algorithms to analyse data; the other ten studies provide contributing research in this field. We discuss several potentials and limitations of the evaluated approach. Conclusions: Overall, the results show that the full potential has not yet been exploited and that further research in this direction is worthwhile, because the study results show that ML algorithms can achieve promising results on POQ data; however, their use in everyday medical practice has not yet been investigated.